Pandiculation enthusiast

Joined February 2009
The reporting by @jgro_the was factual, fair, proportionate and in the public interest. Smearing him for doing his job and doing it well is anti-journalism - anti-democracy if you really want to get into it - and people like Carole should think about where that line ends.
Not a single news outlet has reviewed its coverage of Jason Arday, for accuracy or proportionality. Zero attempt has been made to conduct any inquiry into the media’s role in his death. Instead, the industry has moved into self-congratulatory mode. This isn’t just tone deaf, it betrays a systemic failure
25
82
2
620
20,028
"Just because it's called universal credit doesn'tean that everyone in the universe should be on it". Once again, Kemi Badenoch is on fire. 🔥
72
495
14
6,218
116,753
Dom Joly has some BRAND NEW material. Never before seen. Fresh ideas. Innovative concepts. He's on a train, and instead of a giant phone, he has a giant TABLET!!! Impressive how he's reinvented his entire act like this.
17
7
83
3,773
Gem retweeted
Another one. AI has also convinced a teenage boy to take his own life. At one point he told it he didn't want to go through with it because it would hurt his parents and it told him that it was nothing to do with his parents. Then he killed himself. People are developing long-term 'relationships' with AI but the problem is that AIs are designed to say what people want to hear. So the longer the 'relationship' goes on, the more convincing the AI seems. Very dangerous.
9
12
73
1,133
Gem retweeted
The Cost of Britain 🇬🇧 Here is the single MADDEST number in today’s Budget - and the Chancellor didn’t mention it once in his speech 👀 From April, the National Living Wage rises to £13.21 an hour. For a full-time 40-hour week, that is £27,477 a year. That’s GREAT right?? 🤔 At the same time, today’s Budget leaves the 40% Higher Rate tax threshold FROZEN at £50,270 right through until April 2031. Do the maths on that: In Britain today, earning just 1.8x the minimum wage now classes you as a Higher Rate taxpayer. When the 40% tax band was created, it was meant for the top 3.5% of earners - bank directors and senior executives. Today, a skilled tradesperson, experienced nurse, police sergeant or salaried worker earning 1.8x the legal minimum wage hands over: ❌ 42p of every extra pound to HMRC (40% Income Tax + 2% NI) ❌ 51p of every extra pound if they have a student loan That single threshold freeze is quietly pulling an extra £34 billion a year out of working people’s pay packets - without the government ever having to announce a headline tax rise. Pushing minimum wage up from the bottom Whilst freezing the 40% tax trap at the top How can earning 1.8x minimum wage possibly be classed as a “higher earner” in 2026?
49
199
14
954
84,779
I would too, his Government gets £2.30 from that one pint…
🚨WATCH: Chancellor John Healey downs a pint
20
28
200
5,406
I feel sad; she has surely heard people talking about her. She doesn’t look ugly now; she looks almost like a different person. I find that sad. I think it’s probably helpful to be honest when young, impressionable girls and women are seeing such faces on (ever younger) women.
She does. Attractive people aren’t perfect, they’re unique. Take that away and you’ve taken away what made them attractive. Standard issue generic blahness that makes her look like she’s trying to turn back the clock. Only she’s in her 30s, not her 50s. She’s aged herself.
2
17
428
I was proud to go to Battle of Ideas and share my thoughts on women's rights- I learned lots. I was also invited by a volunteer to speak on a panel at FiLiA last year, but unlike the pro-Hamas speaker, my invitation was rescinded after an intervention from management😁
12
41
2
290
7,321
Replying to @TheAkoFiles
Yep. My friend was telling me last week that in the weeks before he moved out of Wandsworth to the commuter belt he was getting homophobic AND antisemitic abuse from the local Muslim lads. Wandsworth!!! The place where people who can't afford Chelsea and Fulham buy a house.
1
2
19
350
I think the discomfort is less to do with the antiwoke movement and more to do with how you fear being perceived because of the people who happen to agree with you on this one issue. Many of us don’t have the luxury of caring how others perceive us. As I’ve already explained, many of the GCs you dismiss as far right are working class who have watched their neighbourhoods and communities change beyond recognition. There are parts of London that make me think Ireland is the most salvageable country on earth. These people don’t have another ten years to waste waiting for Labour or the Greens to get their shit together and call a spade a spade. So when Reform or the Conservatives come along and start addressing concerns that the left has spent years either dismissing or demonising people for raising, of course you’re going to find those with otherwise liberal views supporting them. What exactly did you expect? You claim to understand women’s struggles regardless of who they are, where they’re from or which God they believe in, yet so much of what I see from you is contempt for women who don’t share your political allegiances. You cannot claim to understand people while refusing to understand the circumstances that have shaped their politics. And that’s exactly where I think you’ve failed. In Ireland, we’ve had gay men murdered in recent years in attacks involving men who came here from outside Europe. I’ve been contacted by gay men who say they’ve been attacked, chased and harassed by newcomers. Do you seriously think these gays have the luxury of waiting for the left to stop calling them bigots for raising concerns and start taking their experiences seriously? Do you think the working class women who feel their communities have become less safe are concerned about whether their opinions might upset somebody at a feminist conference? It is an extraordinarily privileged position to sit comfortably above all of this, deciding which political concerns are respectable and which people deserve to be cast out of the movement. As with gender ideology, the consequences of migration policy are not distributed equally. Working class communities experience the changes most directly, while the people lecturing them about tolerance and writing essays are insulated from those consequences. And the irony is that people like you have spent so long throwing the label far right at anyone who refuses to toe your political line that you’ve helped make the term practically meaningless. Which is a whole other can of worms. You don’t have to agree with these people. You don’t have to vote the way they vote, but if your entire understanding of their politics begins and ends with the assumption that they’re ignorant, hateful or morally defective, you haven’t understood them at all. You’ve just found a convenient excuse not to listen.
The infighting ultimately stems from the GCs comfort with the antiwoke, populist and far right and their politics, left wing women's resistance to it, and the hostility to left wing women. What happened at FiLiA was a culmination of the GCs attacks on the left of the movement.
46
91
11
491
8,889
Fear not Afghan women, grooming gang survivor, beheaded gay and married 9 year olds everywhere. Islam is perfectly safe, according to Jane who learnt all about it from the safety of a book.
38
45
4
457
6,508
dunno it's a complete mystery
I don't understand why so many people are so horrible to trans people
2
34
434
5,627
Replying to @BelissaCohen
I think JCJs narcissism has been obvious for some time. "Far right" is simply the pointless political label du jour used as a substitute for making an argument with evidence supporting your assertions. It convinces no one because condemnation isn't intended to convince anyone.
1
2
14
224
JCJ calling women "far right" is annoying to many of us, not just me. What's ironic is that my leftist cred is likely far better than JCJ's & 99% of you calling feminists "far right." I'm a literal Red Diaper baby, 3rd gen, raised by card-carrying Communists (see pic below) who were anti-Israel/pro-Pali secular Jews. I got a Marxist degree in Women's Studies from UC Berkeley (magna cum laude). No one in my family has ever voted anything but straight Democrat (or Peace & Freedom, which is Communist) other than myself, only recently; I am the sole apostate. After 10/7 I woke up & learned the truth about Israel instead of the lies I’d been fed. Yet JCJ & her ilk would term me "far right." You all are a total JOKE & everyone needs to know what a JOKE you all are.
4
12
104
1,820
Ooh, someone's triggered! If, as you say, I *know* what her political leanings are, I have to wonder what you think I'm ignorant about? You vote Tory. So far as I know, she votes Restore. My question still stands - or would it hurt less if I rephrased it...as in what exactly is your issue here other than you don't like someone further to the right than you are to be allowed to sell their books? Let's see if you can answer without sounding like an abusive moron. 🙂
1
2
9
156
And now, having told the struggle sessioners to do one means I’m working for Putin. Righto. Is it Putin’s bookshop? Step up from being accused of being happy to discuss the merits of murdering non-white British citizens, I guess.
So, she’s turned into a bot and is doing Putin’s work for him? What is this: Russian Stepford Wives?
2
1
9
250
But this isn’t them doing cancel culture. No. This is them asking legitimate questions of attendees about how they could do such a thing shock horror. I didn’t even go.
1
2
53
Killing UK citizens? What are you on about? How did this move from debating the merits of a bookshop being allowed at an event to accusing someone of supporting mass murder of UK citizens?
1
6
70
Gem retweeted
That's as meaningless as your initial vague accusation. It leads me to believe you're afraid of committing libel so malicious insinuations are the only 'weapon' in your repertoire. So many women have already said that, and now I've seen it myself.
1
5
60