Aaron Verber (@aaronverber) header
Aaron Verber (@aaronverber) profile picture

Mostly I'm (still) just thinking about Star Trek: The Next Generation.

Henderson, NV
Joined March 2007
Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)Photo by Aaron Verber (@aaronverber)
I'm making a near-future open world pixel art adventure where you solve crimes, make friends, and maybe save the city while you're at it. It's called Calder Days, set in a fictional midwest city with over 15 square miles to explore...coming soon!
3
19
Aaron Verber retweeted
SIR PATRICK STEWART (1940-2026) Before everything else, Patrick was defined by being born and bred in Yorkshire, the proud county in the north of England which he loved to the end. You could hear it in his accented voice and in the stern honesty with which he told you what he thought and felt. Yorkshiremen have no truck with half-truths or avoidance of big issues. He wore his heart on his sleeve, which made him a man to rely on, to admire and in my case, love. We first met as ambitious young actors with the Royal Shakespeare Company half a century ago but we weren’t in the same productions. My first strong memory was a few years later, meeting him in the street in central London when he told me about an offer to take over a leading part in 'Star Trek'. “But Patrick think of your stage career in the UK. Do you really want to risk—getting lost in Hollywood for years and years?”. Well, he took the risk and thank goodness for us all that he did for not just his devoted Trekkies but film and theatre audiences, who marvelled at his using international celebrity to star in a string of cinema successes ('X-Men' of course) and in great classical plays by Shakespeare, Ibsen, Arthur Miller, Peter Shaffer, Pinter and Beckett at Stratford-upon-Avon, in London’s West End and on Broadway. America was his adopted home, where he met his adored Sunny who has cared for him through sickness and health, through thick and thin. But he never forsook his origins: and the proudest achievement of the most respected and beloved actor of his generation on either side of the Atlantic, was his appointment as Chancellor of Huddersfield University in Yorkshire. His farewell performance in 'Avengers: Doomsday' is yet to be seen. Ian McKellen 29 October 2026 Photo: University of Huddersfield
3,106
87,434
4,178
448,172
5,921,608
Aaron Verber retweeted
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to: Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund    alzresearch.org/giving/ Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources     alzfdn.org/donate/ Photo Credit: Tommy Garcia
6,588
78,899
17,283
341,753
11,127,154
Aaron Verber retweeted
What famous person was born in your birthday month/year?
733
600
2,573
9,657
10,115,589
rimworld just got an update that completely replaces unity with an in-house engine. mods work without adjustments performance is more than doubled (2.2x increase in FPS, TPS, and less than half boot load times) saves have both forward AND backwards compatibility how the fuck
182
678
67
15,969
400,812
Aaron Verber retweeted
reminder that starfield had 4000 people working on it and they assured us this wasn't possible
A software engineer named Frederik Wessberg is creating a PC mod for Starfield that enables seamless landings on planets and moons without any loading screens! The mod will be 100% free and released on Nexus Mods. Frederik says, “You can do it entirely auto-piloted and leave your cockpit seat and walk freely around your ship or enjoy the views while the ship flies from orbit to ground. Or, you can fly manually too. Fly around in low orbit and enjoy the views, or indeed fly uninterrupted to land on the ground.” #Starfield
257
1,177
23
28,562
492,131
Aaron Verber retweeted
I think we should all be mourning the world we knew. Even if Opus 5.5 is the best model ever made and nothing ever surpasses it the world we knew is gone forever
108
151
24
3,650
164,904
Aaron Verber retweeted
If your Star Trek script couldn't be adapted by a low budget local theater, it's probably a bad Star Trek script.
22
202
16
2,460
38,002
What if you could build your own starship, crew it, and explore the galaxy? Coming soon!
1
1
3
Aaron Verber retweeted
Being a dev today using frontier AI feels like I'm playing Watson to Sherlock Holmes. I just stand back and go "my word holmes how did you deduce that" and occasionally stop him from getting shot
31
671
38
11,086
224,883
公式声明: 先日、ネット上でKOJIMA PRODUCTIONSに関する記事が掲載されました。 これをきっかけとして、『PHYSINT』のパブリッシングパートナー変更の理由について憶測が飛び交っています。この状況は、皆様もご覧になったかもしれません。 当スタジオは、インターネットなどでの根拠のない憶測についてはコメントを控えておりますが、PlayStationとの関係、『DEATH STRANDING』シリーズの商業的実績、そして『PHYSINT』の制作計画や投資に関するこれらの憶測、あるいは誹謗中傷は、当スタジオのことのみならず、ファンの皆様、クリエイティブパートナー、そして30年にわたり共に仕事をしてきた関係者の皆様にも影響を及ぼしています。 書かれた記事内容のいずれも、公式または記録に残る確かな情報源に基づくものではありません。これらの記事や情報については慎重にご判断いただくようお願いいたします。 当該記事が皆様に不安を与えたことは承知しており、この状況を看過することは、当スタジオにとって深刻な事態を招き、多方面に重大な影響を及ぼす可能性があると認識しております。 ここに改めて明確に申し上げたいのは、当スタジオは健全かつ黒字の状態にあり、『PHYSINT』の開発はXBOXと連携して順調に進められており、PlayStationとの関係も引き続き強固であるということです。 皆様の変わらぬご支援に感謝申し上げます。 KOJIMA PRODUCTIONS
298
5,385
484
21,995
2,364,164
Aaron Verber retweeted
25
132
3
1,986
17,526
there's a reason why Hasan is called "the real life Brian Griffin". the harder he tries to sound like some sort of intellectual the dumber he actually comes off bc it's just what a dumb frat guy thinks an intellectual should sound like lmao
Hasan says it probably would have been better to not do the Axios interview Points out journalists like Axios's Alex Thompson are all aiming to be the interview that takes him down "Probably better if I just didn't do the interview at all..certainly would have been better if I didn't say pound for pound. Sometimes it's fine even if things are correct, perhaps not everyone can say them..perhaps someone with a name like Hasan who is being aggressively slammed into the campaign of a guy who's named Abdul should not be saying those things regardless I'm too hard headed and too stubborn to a fault, especially when it comes to analysis and perspective" "The media environment is unfair, we know that already..the PR crisis management mentality..if I had a publicist..would be to never do an interview like that at all..to never do any interviews in general, not even positive ones bc God forbid they take something I'm saying out of context..and then use it against the Abdul race..it's not fair, but we don't live in a fair world..for every one pearl clutching tweet about this, there are about 3 who ask, is this wrong? That's important" "Every journalist in the media is looking for the interview that takes a person down, and considering that I've become public enemy number 1..there are going to be more contentious interviews going forward..Alex Thompson came up to the mantle and he swung, I don't think that it is as devastating as he thinks this is”
32
165
4
3,306
62,029
Aaron Verber retweeted
I built a Photoshop-like image editor. It’s called Compositor. robbietilton.com/compositor I originally built it for myself to get off my Adobe subscription, but decided to release it for free and make it open source. It has all the essential tools I need for compositing, with none of the BS. I know this workflow is kind of archaic in 2026, but I’m still using it until AI can actually get pixel-perfect on some of the details. The entire app is 12MB. Photoshop is 6,455MB on my machine.
1,126
2,194
467
20,068
2,480,574
Aaron Verber retweeted
>be me >discover effective altruism >apparently normal charity is inefficient >why donate to random sad thing when spreadsheet can tell you optimal sad thing >fair enough >buy mosquito nets >save lives >numbers look good >feel powerful >couple years later >someone asks an innocent question >why only count people alive today >huh >future people matter too >obviously >my grandchildren shouldn't matter less just because they haven't spawned yet >reasonable.jpg >keep following logic >what about their grandchildren >also yes >what about people in 500 years >sure >5000 years >why not >500 million years >starting to get weird but morality is morality >open calculator >humanity could survive for an astronomically long time >could colonize galaxy >could have trillions upon trillions of descendants >maybe digital people too >maybe simulated civilizations >maybe dyson spheres full of happy uploaded minds >calculator starts smoking >realize currently living humans are rounding error >8 billion people suddenly looking extremely beta >future contains potentially 10^something people >can't even fit beneficiaries in google sheets >new moral priority unlocked >protect the long-term future >stop thinking in units of "people helped" >start thinking in "fraction of cosmic endowment preserved" >malaria? >terrible >but only kills existing humans >AI extinction could delete the entire light cone >nuclear war could permanently derail civilization >bad institutions could lock in terrible values for ten million years >someone invents wrong constitution in 2140 >quadrillions suffer >better fund governance workshop now >friend says maybe we should improve hospitals >explain opportunity cost >friend says hospitals are full of actual sick people >explain scope sensitivity >friend stops inviting me to dinner >need to decide what to fund >easy >expected value >suppose project has one in a million chance of preventing extinction >sounds tiny >but extinction destroys 10^50 future lives >multiply >mother of god >$10 million project has expected value of several galaxies >charity evaluation complete >someone asks where the one-in-a-million number came from >expert judgement >which expert >us >how calibrated >extremely thoughtfully >reduce estimate to one in ten million to be conservative >still beats curing cancer by 38 orders of magnitude >epistemic robustness achieved >someone says maybe project doesn't work >assign 20% chance >still astronomical >maybe project makes problem worse >assign 5% chance >still astronomical >why 5 >because 30 felt pessimistic >publish 46-page report >contains seventeen sensitivity analyses >every sensitivity analysis begins after assuming intervention has positive sign >critic says you're multiplying enormous hypothetical stakes by extremely uncertain probabilities >yes >that's literally why it's important >critic says the uncertainty might be structural rather than numerical >make probability smaller >critic says no, I mean maybe your model is wrong >make probability smaller again >critic begins rubbing temples >discover AI safety >perfect longtermist cause >AI might kill everyone >or create utopia >or seize galaxy >or tile universe with paperclips >or create billions of conscious software minds >finally a problem with numbers big enough for me >start AI safety nonprofit >mission: prevent dangerous AI >hire smartest people available >smartest people immediately start building better AI to understand dangerous AI >interesting >we must understand capabilities to understand safety >we must scale models to study alignment >we must race ahead so less responsible actors don't get there first >we must deploy systems to learn how deployment can go wrong >we must build the thing quickly because building the thing quickly is dangerous >outsider asks why the people most worried about AI apocalypse all work at AI companies >complicated field >company releases stronger model >very concerned >company begins training even stronger model >extremely concerned >company raises $14 billion >concern reaches unprecedented levels >need to influence government >future is at stake >normal democratic process too slow >politicians don't understand exponential curves >public doesn't understand x-risk >experts must guide them >who counts as expert >people who understand x-risk >who understands x-risk >our friends >someone objects that this seems politically convenient >explain we're representing future generations >future generations unavailable for comment >develop concept of value lock-in >terrifying possibility that one ideology controls civilization forever >therefore extremely important that civilization adopts correct values before lock-in >whose values >let's circle back >begin with impartial morality >end with small group of people deciding what quadrillions of hypothetical beings would want >beautiful arc >meanwhile actual humans keep doing annoying things >voting wrong >having parochial attachments >loving family more than strangers >caring about local community >getting upset when told their suffering is cosmically negligible >evolutionary biases everywhere >explain that moral intuition cannot be trusted >except intuition that future digital people count >and intuition that extinction is uniquely bad >and intuition that our probability estimates are sane >and intuition that our institutional choices improve the future >those intuitions survived peer review >someone donates $5k to local homeless shelter >inefficient >could have funded 0.0000000000003% of an AI governance researcher >think of all the simulated people you just killed >okay maybe don't phrase it that way publicly >PR team says "future generations deserve a voice" >much better >journalist asks what longtermism means >say "future people matter" >everyone agrees >great >journalist asks what follows from that >well technically we should redirect enormous resources toward low-probability interventions affecting astronomical futures >journalist raises eyebrow >return to "future people matter" >motte has entered the chat >critic: of course future people matter >me: glad we agree >critic: I don't agree that your institute knows how to help them >me: why do you hate our grandchildren >eventually notice uncomfortable implication >if future value dominates everything >then helping people today mostly matters through effects on future >education matters because future institutions >health matters because future productivity >democracy matters because future trajectory >human beings slowly become instrumental variables in their own moral philosophy >see starving child >feel compassion >check spreadsheet >child's direct welfare contribution negligible >but perhaps childhood nutrition improves national institutional quality >compassion restored >tell myself this is impartial altruism >one day assistant asks obvious question >"how do you know your intervention actually improves the far future?" >silence >open spreadsheet >increase column width >add confidence interval >assistant asks again >"no, I mean how do you know the sign is positive?" >stare into cosmic light cone >10^50 people staring back >none of them exist >none of them can tell me >none of them can falsify my assumptions >realize I have invented the perfect constituency >infinitely important >completely silent >and always represented by me
760
2,390
944
20,415
2,892,086
Steam should require disclosure if you used a game engine. I want to know if you're really a game developer or just a lazy guy using other people's code.
70
21
8
879
28,019
I admit I sometimes roll my eyes when I see Debra Wilson pop up in another new game trailer. But damn it, good for her! What a career! She's even on Deep Space Nine! In a voice-only role! Like they saw the meme coming before it happened.
Debra Wilson is on her generational run in video games
52
Aaron Verber retweeted
so what exactly did the Anthropic guy quit over if the ceo himself agrees with him?
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
114
121
13
3,105
152,067