
top 0.01% hackers break your codebase | Trusted by @centrifuge, @zama, @lifiprotocol
Joined March 2025
- Tweets57
- Following5
- Followers706
- Likes105
Alex Filippov breaks Ethereum for a living.
- Won the Ethereum Foundation's $2M Pectra competition ($342K), $203K from a single Lighthouse High
- Won the Ethereum Fusaka contest with 2 solo Highs ($155K)
- #3 all-time on Cantina ($542K+)
We asked @alexfilippov314 how he splits the work with AI 👇
Building or upgrading an Ethereum client, consensus or networking code, or a ZK or cryptography-heavy protocol?
Reach out for a security review: b612security.com/contact
1
36
Want hand-picked researchers on your code before launch?
Get in touch about a private bug bounty: b612security.com/services/bu…
2
251
We’ve reviewed the new Vault Development Kit (VDK) by the Centrifuge team!
Very clean codebase -- the security review surfaced only one significant issue, which the team successfully resolved. We’ll share the report soon!
Great work by Jeroen and the rest of the team at @centrifuge 👏!
A hacker exploited a flaw in Wormhole and created 120,000 wrapped ETH out of thin air, stealing $326 MILLION from a crypto bridge in a matter of minutes.
> On February 2, 2022, an attacker targeted Wormhole, a bridge that lets people move crypto assets between blockchains.
> The bridge was supposed to verify that transactions were legitimate before releasing or creating assets on another network.
> But a flaw in its Solana-side verification system allowed the attacker to bypass a critical security check.
> Instead of proving that the required assets were locked on another blockchain, the attacker tricked the system into accepting forged verification data.
> Wormhole then minted 120,000 wrapped ETH on Solana without the equivalent ETH being deposited to back it.
> The haul was worth roughly $326 MILLION at the time.
> The attacker moved 93,750 $ETH to Ethereum, worth around $250 MILLION, while the remaining wrapped ETH stayed on Solana.
> Wormhole shut down the bridge as its team scrambled to patch the vulnerability.
> The team even offered the attacker a $10 MILLION bounty to return the funds and explain the exploit.
> The attacker never returned the money. Instead, Jump Crypto stepped in and supplied 120,000 ETH to restore the bridge’s backing.
> A few months later, Wormhole paid another $10 MILLION bounty but this time to a white-hat researcher who discovered a separate critical vulnerability before it could be exploited.
> But the original attacker still had a large amount of the stolen ETH, which they had moved into DeFi protocols.
> In February 2023, a white-hat group showed Oasis how the attacker's position could be taken over, and the team received a court order to retrieve the assets.
> What followed was a counter-exploit that took control of the attacker's DeFi position and recovered roughly $225 MILLION in collateral.
> After accounting for the debt attached to those assets, the estimated net recovery was around $140 MILLION.
> The attacker had stolen $326 MILLION from Wormhole. A year later, part of the money was recovered by turning the attacker's own position against them.
At B612, we make sure your bug never becomes a hack story.
Reach out for a security review: b612security.com/contact
4
97
Tomorrow we're dropping how 17 world-class researchers went after a protocol holding more than $1 billion in institutional money before its upgrade went live.
Bug bounties got 10x more brutal. Tomorrow we're dropping how a B612 security researcher who took $203,733 from a single bug in an Ethereum client still finds bugs nobody else does.
B612 Security retweeted
Centrifuge V3.3 is about to go live.
As part of our security process before deployment, the release was independently reviewed by @sherlockdefi, @burraSec and @yAuditDAO, with multiple audits covering both the new functionality and its interaction with the broader protocol.
The infrastructure being used by onchain funds and vaults needs repeated review before every release.
Our focus over the past 6 months has been on improving the security services for our existing clients.
We have massively improved our internal audit process, and we continue to work with the most talented security researchers.
13
1,414
Our researchers utilize AI, but we never want to rely on it too much.
Every PoC, every exploit scenario — we make sure we understand everything 100%.
Our mission is to secure the web3 space, and we'll use any tool available to make this mission succeed.
We're here for the long run.
2
9
1,856
Our researchers are top-class, with some of them having 10+ years of software development experience.
Lately, we've been doing more and more deployment script reviews, reviewing deployed contracts, analyzing codebases that are about to launch on new chains, and similar tasks.
We're well-equipped to take on any task beyond your typical security review.
DMs are open.
29
2,087
We've been working on solving the hardest problem in web3 security.
How do you find the most complex vulnerabilities that slip through rounds of private audits, AI reviews, competitive audits, and bug bounties?
Sometimes the simplest solution works best. Get the best whitehats in one room and let them collaborate freely.
3
40
2,686
Our greatest pride is contributing to the giants of our industry.
We've helped secure:
- @centrifuge: $1.3B+ TVL
- @lifiprotocol: $60B+ total transfer value, biggest Bridge & DEX Aggregator in the space
- @PancakeSwap: $2.9B+ TVL
- @zama: one of the biggest players about to transform the privacy space
We have extensive experience reviewing cross-chain integrations. We have reviewed:
- @LayerZero_Core
- @axelar
- @AcrossProtocol
- @wormhole
- @RelayProtocol
- @chainlink CCIP
- @eco
- @gardenfi
- @lifiprotocol
Check out the reports at: github.com/burrasec/Security….
Reach out if you're building across multiple chains.
1
17
1,352
Some of our audits are fully collaborative, while others foster competition between researchers.
There's no magic pill, and every engagement is different.
We've been experimenting a lot with different modes of working. For every engagement, we think through what will yield the best results.
Constant improvement and an iterative approach are our greatest strengths.
Biggest danger with AI is getting sloppier at everything you do.
This can slip up on you if you're not vigilant. AI makes false claims while sounding confident.
One of our core values is thoroughness. That means leaving no stone unturned — but it also means every reported issue has to be understood 100% and tested with a POC (Proof of Concept).
We've read too many audit reports with false claims and wrongly identified issues. Making mistakes is normal, but in the final deliverable, we aim for assertiveness and confidence in all our claims.
2
15
692
We have extensive experience reviewing cross-chain integrations. We have reviewed:
- @LayerZero_Core
- @axelar
- @AcrossProtocol
- @wormhole
- @RelayProtocol
- @chainlink CCIP
- @eco
- @gardenfi
- @lifiprotocol
Check out the reports at: github.com/burrasec/Security….
Reach out if you're building across multiple chains.
Biggest danger with AI is getting sloppier at everything you do.
This can slip up on you if you're not vigilant. AI makes false claims while sounding confident.
One of our core values is thoroughness. That means leaving no stone unturned — but it also means every reported issue has to be understood 100% and tested with a POC (Proof of Concept).
We've read too many audit reports with false claims and wrongly identified issues. Making mistakes is normal, but in the final deliverable, we aim for assertiveness and confidence in all our claims.
Researchers working on Burra Security audits are world-class. With competency and class, you'll often find ego.
Researchers work independently, and during certain checkpoints throughout the audit, all researchers share their findings and brainstorm together — combining attack vectors, maximizing the outcome, and pushing for really complex issues.
During these sessions, it's PARAMOUNT TO PUT EGO aside and focus on combining attack vectors, maximizing the impact of each issue, and making sure there are no false claims.
Discussions around severity come last.
That's our golden rule!









