
Cofounder, AI @EQTYLab / prev dc - complex systems / veteran / For fun: @plannotator
NYC
Joined March 2024
- Tweets1.9K
- Following978
- Followers2.2K
- Likes4.7K
Pinned Tweet
Anthropic code review this, clanker review that ... why don't you shut up and review+annotate your own code.... (yes im a loser who still manually reviews code)
Originally inspired by a bunch of feature requests and then seeing @dillon_mulroy tweet a similar cool ux.
@plannotator for reviewing plans (primary focus) and code, fully oss.
OpenCode, @badlogicgames 's pi.dev, and Claude Code and other clankers
Many of the novel sandbox/agent-vm providers are not providing any substantial difference or advantage over an EC2 box
This is the way for me personally as well. Not just personal wiki, but every major project at this point is a massive context/project polyrepo.
Im not sure what a third party could really offer at this point that beats filesystem net performance here - for memory, context, etc. Typical memory products dont fit well here. Context aggregators I do not think are right either... it all needs to live together with the code.
The possible contenders in the space are Code-forge providers. IDE/ADE, Cloudflare Artifacts, Cursor Origin could all better innovate here.
backnotprop.com/blog/context…
/fire-subagent
"fire the subagent that just produced that slop. Start up a new one and tell it be better than its predecessor"
Michael Ramos retweeted
hanging out during AIE New York riffing agentic coding, plans, inboxes, and a whole lot more with the ur boy @backnotprop creator of @plannotator and more importantly the /bro skill
Telling you guys AI code review, esp 3rd party, is going to die. You’re not going to pay an extra $1/PR when your company is pumping thousands of PRs a day.
Instead, better models and stronger codebase verification systems means implementation agents achieve correctness more efficiently and on their own during development. Everything we did in CI will move upstream for efficiency.
Guided Reviews went viral a bunch last week.
FYI, there is an open-source version and also the ability to send portable guided reviews as html files.
github.com/backnotprop/plann…
Michael Ramos retweeted
yeah, we're definitely going back to managing an inbox
Decision making is becoming the bottleneck with agent coding. Basically all I do all day is answer questions, review prototype variants, and decide if i like outputs, etc.
The chat interface is meaningless at this point - terrible surface for staying in the loop. I give the agent an instruction and they go off and do 1000 things. It throws random questions and review artifacts at me all day and those are where my focus lands. E.g. Two hours into the session says, oh yeah, I still need your decision on X, Y, or Z, which who knows where in the chat those were. So I ask for a html or markdown to review with context.
The more AI can do, the more it covers across systems and integration and we're just not yet at a point where I think you can be loosely blind to that stuff. It's getting harder the more they can do. Still fun.
One solution might look like an email inbox
xitter.cf/plannotator/status/210…
Shipping something today
The new @plannotator inbox feature is a great experiment. I'm liking it so far.
Finally, some innovation in the way we interact with agents.
I'm so tired of Claude sending those messages: "Two decisions from you yesterday are still yours." I have zero context about what it is
Michael Ramos retweeted
Introducing Plannotator Inbox.
Making decisions is the new bottleneck, while your agents work on many things across many threads over longer periods of time.
Inbox is how you stay in-the-loop, organized, alongside the agent harnesses you already prefer to use.
Try today, free, local, open source.










