Ayatollah of the Sacred Doctrine of Physical Removal & High Cleric of Ancapistan.
Ancapistan
Joined April 2022
- Tweets36.6K
- Following711
- Followers350
- Likes93K
Pinned Tweet
Il faut vraiment être le dernier des bouseux à la psychologie moutonnière pour croire que le pédophile notoire Keynes avait la moindre affinité avec le libéralisme ou le libre-échange.
Le keynésianisme, c'est le triomphe du socialisme le plus insidieux.
youtu.be/uZYAFaHSsZY
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
La elecciones de Israel 🇮🇱 el día de hoy son sumamente importantes:
Quién gane es el nuevo presidente de EE.UU.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Yoram hazony and Jonathan keeperman said that there was a natural fusion of Our nationalism and *their* nationalism!
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Bro, Hoppe is getting cancelled everywhere.
#IStandWithHoppe
Since I frequently engage with libertarians and recently hosted a philosophical discussion involving Hoppe, I want to clarify something about the ”so-called Holocaust“ controversy.
I’m always open to discussing philosophical ideas, regardless of their origins. I also have no objection to political criticism of Israel. But I have no desire to associate with or continue discussions with people who knowingly promote Holocaust denial or distortion, including the kinds of claims Hoppe makes in this video. I consider this a fairly self-evident moral boundary that requires no further justification.
I don’t assume that everyone who admires Hoppe shares these views. Furthermore, it’s certainly legitimate to appreciate his philosophical ideas without endorsing the kinds of claims he’s making here.
In fact, my own primary philosophical interest at the moment is the work of Martin Heidegger, who famously joined the Nazi Party and held antisemitic views. I consider Heidegger a morally contemptible human being, yet also a great philosopher whose work I deeply admire.
I think it is possible, and even advisable, to distinguish the philosophical significance of someone’s ideas from the moral character of the person who developed them. But this distinction should not come at the expense of intellectual responsibility and moral judgment.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
I love what is happening with Hoppe! I have a message from Hayek for all of these ignorant -negligent so-called "economists" and "libertarians" out there embarrassing themselves for posterity by attacking Hoppe.
“Nobody can be a great economist who is only an economist — and I am even tempted to add that the economist who is only an economist is likely to become a nuisance if not a positive danger.” - Hayek
Please just stop. You look as foolish as those parroting their 5th booster.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Genuine Question:
Why do jews get the one and only "the" holocaust, and all other races holocausts need to use a qualifier?
Who made that rule?
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Everyone criticizing Hoppe for this is cringe.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
You should listen to Hoppe. Criticizing the narrative and asking for further investigation is never wrong.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
People will fight Hoppe on this and haven’t even watched the video.
Hoppe isn’t a “Holocaust” denier for questioning why there is so little evidence.
Let me explain what Hoppe is actually saying in simpler terms:
"It's hypocrisy that Nuremberg trials in 1945 had a lot shittier evidence that wasn't available until 1990s (and later), and Germany has strict laws around talking about and the Holocaust since 1960 (before that 1990s evidence) and despite that unavailable evidence, the Holocaust was treated as a terrible, undeniable crime, while all Gaza evidence IS available- yet it's considered self-defense. Make it make sense!".
What Hoppe is NOT claiming: "the Holocaust did not happen".
Hoppe is NOT saying revisionists were correct - he's saying EVEN the revisionists aren't denying that the Holocaust was a crime.
Hoppe's main point is about state control of narratives, which should be very obvious here.
That, states have no problem organizing kangaroo courts 45 years before evidence is fully available, or creating censorship 30 years before evidence appears, when evidence of an atrocity are fully available right now, states claim it's just self-defense.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Quotes are literally full of people that lack basic comprehension of what he is actually saying
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Wow the state created clustered malinvestment that the market eventually caught onto, who could’ve predicted that?!?
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Every Nietzschean vitalist retard posting philosemitic ‘techno fascism’ edits is so caught up in their Solipsistic Hubris that they don’t realize they aren’t actually “Elite” aristocrats, they are actually powerless faggots on the internet and the people they are promoting hate them and would never respect them. If you post this content I hate you too.
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
The naive clueless mob wants to label the great Hoppe as Nazi-like. Ahh...the mob.
The Economic Doctrine of the Nazis by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
youtu.be/LYEUHk16yk4?is=FveP…
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Gloria, ya que no me respondiste, te vuelvo a citar mis comentarios y preguntas, Pero, además, añado:
¿Qué dijo Hoppe que lo hace "fascista"? ¿Cuestionar una narrativa estatal ahora es fascista? ¿Denunciar el genocidio en Gaza es fascista? Nadie se opone de forma más coherente y absoluta al Estado, ni defiende de forma más absoluta la libertad, que Hoppe.
xitter.cf/MartinCGamazoR/status/…
1. Lo que Hoppe hace en este clip es cuestionar, y con toda la razón, la narrativa oficial del Estado respecto al Holocausto, enforzada mediante la persecución de quienes se atrevan a dudar mínimamente de esta. Esto es perfectamente coherente. ¿No se supone que el libertario es anti-estado? ¿Cómo se va a ser "anti-estado" si uno no se atreve a cuestionar las narrativas oficiales del Estado? Rothbard también era un gran revisionista, y con toda la razón.
2. Lo que dice es totalmente cierto. Hay mucha más evidencia del genocidio en Gaza que la que hay del Holocausto. Pone en relieve la hipocresía y lo descarados que son quienes niegan lo que sucede en Gaza mientras siempre que pueden nos recuerdan el Holocausto.
3. ¿Dios intelectual de Milei? Es cierto que Milei en alguna ocasión dijo que Hoppe era su "norte", al igual que lo dijo respecto a Rothbard, pero cualquier análisis crítico de alguien aunque sea mínimamente familiarizado con las obras de Rothbard y Hoppe revela que Milei no tiene idea de lo que habla, y no conoce la obra ni de Rothbard, ni de Hoppe, ni de Mises ni nadie en la Escuela Austriaca. Esto se nota en sus discursos, en su política exterior, en su política monetaria, y también en sus libros. Por lo mismo, Hoppe salió a criticar públicamente a Milei ya en al menos 6 ocasiones, y a mostrar que no tiene nada que ver con ese desgraciado. ¿No reivindicabas tú el hecho de que Hoppe criticara tan duramente a Milei?
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Dear Libertarians/Austrians
This guy knows what he's doing. He deliberately misrepresent our position for engagement. I know this because it's impossible for anyone to be this stupid.
Stop promoting bad faith actors
ⵎⴰⵀⵔ retweeted
Hans-Hermann Hoppe is an Ancap (meaning Anarcho-Capitalist), why are you people surprised he’s questioning state narratives which lack forensic investigations and hard evidence backing them?!
