Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg) header
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg) profile picture

Learn how to acquire, grow, and invest in cash-flowing SMBs | Bought healthcare biz at 26, grew 8x by 31 | Subscribe to the SMB Scoop weekly newsletter

Join 8500 SMB entrepreneurs ⬇️
Joined April 2009
Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)Photo by Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 (@bentigg)
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Just launched a new sales coaching tool called Maximus. Maximus is designed to help sales reps improve their demos and close more deals faster. DM me, and I’ll hook you up with an account! #sales #Zoom
3
2
10
3,167
THE STATE OF PRIVATE EQUITY IN 2024 (WITH DATA): My oh my has this been a fascinating year. LOYAL readers of my work will have remembered that I was somewhat concerned about a few things in the market...namely the weird confluence of dry powder, longer holding times, higher interest rates...and more. WELL YA'LL THE NUMBERS ARE IN. Let's dig into the state of private equity in 2024 (shout out pitchbook). DEAL VOLUMES: First things first, let's get into the deal volume. Deal volume is technically 23% higher than 2024, but still 42%(!!!) below the peak in 2021. Deal volume is recovering a BIT but we are still lower than our GLORY DAYS of 2021 (RIP). Fascinatingly, when you dig into the number, it tells a more nuanced story. While 'deal counts' are up, there's been a big shift towards Growth Equity vs traditional LBOs. So while the masters of the universe might say 'we are so back' it really depends on which master of the universe you're talking to...growth or LBO. Now, I'm in software, so you know I'm going to dig into that. WAYYY different story in software. In 2021, according to pitchbook, there were 1842 deals. This year? We are pacing for 1044. Yikes. To my brothers and sisters in software PE: i'm sorry guys. Not our year. PE has clearly slowed down on tech deals. Possibly focusing on Ops? Shocker. So deal volumes are...kind of...recovering depending on who you are. How's the valuation environment? VALUATIONS: So, we are doing less deals...that should probably have led to a lower EV/EBITDA right? Hey, less demand RIGHT?! RIGHT!!! NO!!!! YOU FOOL! Something fascinating is happening in EV/EBITDA multiples. When you look at EV/EBITDA valuations over time, during the biggest year for PE deals (2021) EV/EBITDA was at 13.7x. We also had lower interest rates. 2024? We are hitting the highest number on record for Pitchbook: 15x. Wow. Not only do we have higher interest rates than 2021, we are paying the highest multiple ever for companies. Better pick a good one huh? Why? Well, my gut tells me dry powder. Even though PE fund raising has fallen dramatically, there's still a TON of money on the side lines. One might also argue that given there are less deals, PE funds might be playing more conservatively and overpaying for quality. Tough to say. EXITS: Well, Even though we are paying a ton for companies, we are exiting the companies from earlier vintages right? Maybe?! The number of PE owned companies has swelled to 11,567, with 36% being held for 5 years or more. Exits are essentially flat year over year, but values are high. The exit/investment ratio isn't improving, creating an imbalance. Enter the continuation fund baby! 2024 is on pace to surpass the 82 exits through continuation funds recorded in 2023, setting a new record! Good news for secondaries funds :) So how are they getting liquidity without selling? Median holding times for PE companies seems to be accelerating as well. See graph: DIVIDEND RECAPS: There's been a surge in loans issued to fund dividend recapitalizations, with $35 billion of institutional loan issuance for this purpose in the first half of 2024, outpacing the record-setting year of 2021. I guess that answers that. LEVERAGE: Given the state of interest rates and lower deal volumes, I'm not sure what I expected to see in leverage use. No real guess here, but the data is intreresting. For broadly syndicated loan (BSL) funded deals, the debt/EBITDA multiple has increased from 4.8x in 2023 to 5.1x in 2024. The equity/EBITDA multiple for BSL-funded deals has remained relatively stable at 6.1x in 2024, compared to 6.0x in 2023. This indicates that while leverage is increasing, PE firms are also maintaining significant equity stakes in their deals. I suppose this makes sense: prices for quality are obviously higher. Same equity, more debt (but not too much more). Whelp that's it for me. Conclusions: 1) Trad LBO Deal volume is a bit stagnant relative to dry powder 2) Software deal volume even worse 3) VALUATIONS ARE SOMEHOW UP?! A FLIGHT TO QUALITY PERHAPS! 4) PE funds aren't selling their portcos. Could be a variety of reasons: valuation, ops reasons, declining revenue, demand...who knows. 5) The industry remains fascinating.
7
24
3
242
53,746
WILL AI DESTROY YOUR SOFTWARE COMPANY? OR: WHICH SOFTWARE COMPANY SHOULD I BUILD? I'm a software private equity investor. I look at 10-20 software businesses each week to acquire. I see good, bad, and everything in between. I keep getting this freaking dm 'Now that I can build ANY software company with AI (lol) what should I build?' I've also seen this nonsense going around of 'software is dead'. I'm going to address both of these here. First things first, software is not just software. Software exists across a variety of dimensions/attributes. We have to cover these as they play a massive role in which software will be 'fine' and which software is 'at risk'. This should also tell you indie builders out there which software to go after. For the purposes of this exercise, I'm going to use a darling example company to analyze these attributes: Calendly. Here are some of the attributes I think about when I look at acquiring a business: 1) 'time to yes': How long does it take to sell your software after a customer learns about it? Is it a 3-6 month sales cycle? Is time to yes instant? DO I NEED TO TALK TO SOMEONE ON THE PHONE TO PURCHASE IT? If, like calendly, I can buy it myself with my corporate card? Time to yes has knock on effects on so much: price, churn, etc. It is an important attribute to cover. Calendly's time to yes can be instant. 2) 'implementation time': Software that takes a long time to implement. I call this 'implementation time'. Others in my space call it something else. This is the amount of time it takes between wiring the money and the company actually USING the software. An example might be vertical software for a veterinarian. It could take a full month to configure the software, get all the users onboarded, work through bugs, etc. How long does it take to implement calendly? Well about 4-5 minutes. 3) 'Time to Utility': This is the time between 'the customer can actually use the software' and 'the customer has derived utility'. If we are using calendly as an example, again this near instant. If this is vertical SAAS for managing a veterinary clinic, this time might be a month or two. Sure the software is making the business run 'smoother' but the time to utility might be longer than you think. 4) 'Tear Out Time': some people call this switching cost, but I delineate the two. How long does it take a customer to 'tear it out' and switch? This is NOT the same as switching cost, although some people mistakenly (imo) lump them together. This is measured in TIME. Calendly's tear out time? Near instant for most people. 5) Switching Cost: How much does it cost me to switch? This can be a real number. Let's say I want to switch my CRM from Salesforce to Attio. Not only do I have a probably high 'tear out time', I also have to pay SOMEONE to migrate my sales data from Salesforce to Attio. There's a real dollar cost here, even if Attio claims to have the softawre to do it. What's my switching cost from Calendly to Cal? ...near 0. 6) ACV: Average contract value. Finally we get to price. How much are you charging for your software? If you are Salesforce, this could be 20k. If you're calendly? 8 bucks a month. 7) Churn: self explanatory. 8) Data Moat / Network Effects: Does your business collect data that is difficult to collect via LLM? Do you have data that drives product utility that is difficult to attain? Do you have network effects? THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE THE LENSE THROUGH WHICH YOU SHOULD THINK ABOUT SOFTWARE. Now, getting back to the question: 'will AI destroy my software company?'. Buddy, if you have high time to yes, a high implementation time, and a low time to utility, AI is unlikely to cook your software company. AI DOES NOT REPLACE A 3 MONTH SALES CYCLE AND A HIGH IMPLEMENTATION TIME. Customers are NOT just going to churn because some guy is billing half as much. CEOs value time and attention. If your software is mission critical, tear out time is high, AND switching cost is high? No one is churning. Now: to the inverse. Let's talk about Calendly. Calendly is the perfect example of a business that I think will be in trouble due to AI. Why? (I'm a calendly customer btw) 1) My time to yes is instant. If someone comes to me with a $2 a month replacement, I can instantly say yes. 2) My implementation time is instant. I cancel calendly. I synch my email to new service. Done. 3) Time to utility is instant. 4) TEAR OUT TIME IS 5 MINUTES. YIKES! This is problematic software. 5) Switching cost: Near 0. 6) No data moat. No network effects (rly). To all you indie hackers out there: these are the types of businesses you might want to copy. Why? YOU DON'T NEED AN ENTERPRISE SALES TEAM TO SELL YOUR PRODUCT. Like it or not, even if AI can make a copy of software, spoiler alert you have to go out and SELL IT. There's a reason some B2B SAAS companies NEED venture funding: the sales cycles (time to yes, imp time, time to uitlity) ARE LONG LOL. You NEED those venture dollars to sell this software that will (hopefully) have a very low churn rate. Many of these businesses are fine. Their main problem is people above and below them in the vertical chain. Not addressing this here. What's that mean? DISTRIBUTION MATTERS MORE THAN EVER. If calendly can be copied, learning how to distribute in a low cost way becomes more valuable than ever before in software. SEO. Partnerships. Large scale cold email. Having influencers on board from day 0. These things matter even MORE. So is software dead? Hell no...but companies like calendly will surely have some problems. So to you boot strappers out there, here's what you want: 1) Time to yes can be instant. 2) Time to utility should be as fast as possible. 3) Low Implementation time. 4) Keep price low enough that someone can say 'yes' without needing to call you on the phone but high enough that can make some serious dough. 5) Hopefully find a way to get data that's hard for someone else to get. That'll help with competition and switching cost. YOU WILL HAVE CHURN. But you can also build a 5mm ARR business with 4 employees. Good luck anon
34
61
28
598
142,802
HOW TO USE SEO DURING DUE DILIGENCE IN PRIVATE EQUITY (or the beginnings of SEO competitive research) There are only a few ways to grow a business with 'advertising': -ppc -sponsorships (events, booths, w/e) -direct outreach -other crap -AND SEO Few methods of advertising are 'cost capped' if you will. You can spend an infinite amount of money on PPC + sponsorships with semi difficult to attribute CAC, but the cool part about SEO is that in some ways it is a capped cost. You spend the money to optimize your website + produce SEO content, monitor traffic, and attribute. There are more than a few PE win stories that were mostly based on SEO as a growth vector. So how do we begin? I'm going to do an exercise with a random manufacturing business: Birmingham Fastener. Let's pretend I'm doing due diligence on BF going forward. Birmingham claims to be one of the largest fastener distributors in the USA. Let's see how good they are at SEO! When you first start thinking about a deal, I use a tool called Keysearch to guage how good or bad a company is at seo. The first thing is to check: which friggin websites / keywords do they rank number 1 for? I'm going to use Keysearch to do that. As you can see, they rank for some...subpar keywords. Looks like a lot of their top ones are just fasteners + locations. Pretty good. However, tons of SEO conversions come from 'How to' and other informational topics on fasteners. Let's see which 'How to' they're ranking for: not great. Looks like they aren't ranking for many 'how tos'. Makes me think they haven't taken SEO very seriously (which is a great sign btw...we have a growth vector). Let's move on to the HIGHEST volume keywords they DON'T rank well for. This is another important signal: are there high traffic keywords they already rank for that we can improve: OH WE GOT POTENTIAL. As you can see, there's a ton of high traffic keywords that are CERTAINLY related to their business they aren't ranking highly for. The difficulty scores (on the far right) also tell us that a lot of these shouldn't be a nightmare to rank for. These are bullish signals (for me) meaning there's probably some low hanging fruit for increasing inbound via SEO improvements. Next, for fun, I can look and see who google thinks the competitors of Birmingham Fasteners are. In keysearch's competitor section, we can see web based competitors. Sometimes I use this for sourcing too:
14
8
1
141
21,499
🚨SFC May Panel Alert: Breaking Down The Brokered Deal Game 5/21 sfcbrokered524.splashthat.co… Discount code: @FirstInternetBank FIB524 @SMBJackieHirsch @Sam_Rosati @bentigg diving into CIM analysis, offers, broker / seller relationship dynamics & more. Join for a great discussion!
2
2
3
7
4,505
Who wants a head start on building their legacy family? I'm looking for advance readers for my book ('Family Capital: The Manifesto') to give me feedback. Easy process - Google Docs, add comments as you think of them - and if it works for you I'd love to talk afterwards to discuss your impressions and (confidentially, of course) anything you're wrestling with in your own family's journey. DMs are open!
55
6
3
131
40,253
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Word is there is a last minute super secret SXSW SMB event Friday on the east side, mid afternoon to early eveningish -operators/owners -acquirers -investors The only SXSW event in town where profitable, cash flowing small businesses are the focus 🔥 🔥🔥 Comment for an invite
20
1
18
5,432
In case you didn't know, I live in Meridian, Idaho! I am looking forward to being a part of Ben's Meetup on Feb 15th, and think you should join us if you are in the SMB world!
📢 Boise Idaho SMB business owners, operators, investors, and acquirers: SMB meet up on February 15th. Location is TBD depending on # of RSVPs Like, comment, RT, & tag someone from Boise area to spread the word RSVP link in the next tweet:
2
1
4
1,564
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Love to see it Boise!
📢 Boise Idaho SMB business owners, operators, investors, and acquirers: SMB meet up on February 15th. Location is TBD depending on # of RSVPs Like, comment, RT, & tag someone from Boise area to spread the word RSVP link in the next tweet:
1
3
2,807
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Would love any other Boise peeps who can make it to show up!
📢 Boise Idaho SMB business owners, operators, investors, and acquirers: SMB meet up on February 15th. Location is TBD depending on # of RSVPs Like, comment, RT, & tag someone from Boise area to spread the word RSVP link in the next tweet:
1
5
2,769
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Replying to @bentigg
Having exclusivity is good practice, but don't over think it. Exclusivity is really just a handshake agreement. If the seller violates it, are you really going to sue them? I'm a buyer, here are some seller-friendly ways we treat exclusivity. - short initial period (40 days), with (5 day) auto-extension unless cancelled; easier than milestone based - happy to release buyers if transaction terms change (ie. confirmatory diligence fails) - we ask to see unsolicited offers (or a summary); we want the opportunity to stay in the game - if the buyer wants to go-shop in the LOI, we give it to them for a nominal break fee. rationale: they find a much much better offer, they should take it and offset my time and expense with $. [Note, companies in distress love this; gives the equity time to find more $ while keeping the lender at bay because our offer is going forward]
1
3
1
11
9,472
Super Excited for our Upcoming Search Fund Coalition 2024 Market Outlook Panel 1/17: sfcoutlook124.splashthat.com… Ft. @LisaGForrest @bentigg @FetaFund Free Code by partner @CayneCrossing CAYNE124 Be sure to join us - small group networking to follow panel
1
2
7
3,235
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Replying to @bentigg
Great post! I'm been contemplating what to do next a lot. I sold an SMB in 2021 but I'm just now at the end of the earnout period. I could leave now, but I've decided to give it 6 months before I make any moves. A sabbatical of some kind is one of the options.
2
1
5
3,771
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Replying to @bentigg
Pretty good timing on this. I’m nearing the start of a planned year off beginning Jan 1, however, already struggling with the concept after 90 days of getting ready.
1
1
7
3,677
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Replying to @bentigg
Good advice , I regret not doing this after I sold
2
1
5
3,893
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
When I sold my business in early 2022, I had convos with a bunch of exited entrepreneurs. Their advice: 'take serious time off' and 'don't make any big decisions for the next 6 months' My wife and I decided to take the next 8 months off. We traveled to 13 countries. This is is how we did it. I'm a self diagnosed obsessive when it comes to work. Much of my selfworth has also been wrapped up in what I'm doing, what value I'm providing myself, my family, and others. I guess this is true for other too: The #1 question I got from people was "what's next?". I just spent the last 5 years working my ass off and you're wondering what's next? Cool. Little did they know I had no idea what I wanted to 'next'. I'm sure I said something that sounded reasonable. But reality is I had serious questions about my ability be an entrepreneur again. I wanted to get the the heart of some big questions What do I really enjoy? What do I want to spend my next 5 years doing? Do I have what it takes to be an entrepreneur again? When do we want to start a family? Can I find my life's mission / work where I'll be fulfilled? We needed space & time to begin to answer these questions. We also love travel (exploring & learning), food, people, and wine... It was without a doubt one of the most objectively fun time of our lives: -2 weeks immersive Spanish school in Medellín, Colombia & Atlético Nacional football game -Machu Pichu with our best friends -Scotland with my parents who rarely travel internationally -Randomly coming across Tour de France final day & finish line in Paris -Sailing in the med -Endless stream of Malbec wine in Mendoza, Argentina -mind blowing culture & food in Istanbul -WWII history deep dives and learning in Berlin -white water rafting off grid -meeting so many great people from different cultures We took a unique travel approach...3 weeks ON travelling, 2 weeks OFF back home to hang out with my dog, friends, and family. We had some hobbies & investments we wanted to be back home regularly for so this worked out really well for us, and we like being home just as much as traveling. This made sense to us. We had plenty of downtime. Many days with no agenda, no place to go, nothing to do, impromptu whateverness abound. Sometimes reading a book at a coffee shop...other times exploring a undiscovered part of new city we've never been to. This is where the magic happened. Where we could reflect, appreciate, and be thankful for the gifts of life. Dove deep to figure out what we really want out of our life - marriage, family, work. And it felt good to say "I don't know" to a lot of our questions. And let that be that, not needing to get to an answer but being OK with where we were at. The space enabled my wife and I to get to the root of things. It was hard being honest. But I think we got down to most of our truth as we know it, and super proud of the way in which we did it. We ended our sabbatical in Nov 2022. Since then, we have had our first child + acquired another business. Blessings around...both formed from dreams of our future life we discovered was important to us during our travels / break from 'work'. My advice to any exiting entrepreneur: Stop. Slow down. Be OK with being uncomfortable and not 'doing'. Try new things, explore new hobbies, meet new people and explore, be without the responsibility of achieving for an extended period of time. Give yourself serious space to think, reflect, and intentionally chart the right course for you. I promise you'll find something valuable by the end of of your journey.
16
4
174
79,448
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Wild fall from success and redemption: An ag entrepreneur I know built a $3M EBITDA business and went broke in his late 50s by being over-levered in a cyclical biz during the recession Bankruptcy, lost his shorts, bank after him for millions even after liquidating all the biz assets. Was bleak. But slowly negotiated it down over time Shortly after, he started a new company in the same industry, rode the wave/economy back up, paid off his creditors, and now owns an much bigger business (no debt) He’s now in his early 70s… Last year he made $7M of EBITDA and has a private jet with a pilot A crazy turn of events, couldn’t imagine going through that initial BK then have the ability to turn it around. I would have felt like crumbling under the weight of the situation I asked him how he did it? “I love the game of business” 🤯 My takeaway: His mindset meant he loved the journey most of all (good and bad) and the opportunity to play in the first place Meant he could always take another shot, because there’s always one if you want to continue playing Absolutely not about destination - money or some made up end result
11
3
1
71
24,335
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Slack Water Capital is currently under LOI to acquire a route-based home services and commercial services business located in Key West, FL. We are seeking an operating partner to run the day-to-day operations as CEO with some helpful guidance from me. We are uniquely positioned to grow this business given our extensive experience in the market as well as our connections. Base salary + bonus + earned equity + ability to co-invest equity into the deal. No PG of an SBA loan required. Please email resume & cover letter to [email protected].
14
7
2
90
56,475
LBO LEGENDS: CARLYLE MADE A BILLION DOLLARS ON RATTY SNEAKERS. You know the deal. I've pulled 300,000 M&A/LBO transactions. I profile the highest returning private equity transactions of all time. This is the story of golden goose, a company that sells $500 distressed sneakers (lmao). First things first, wtf is golden goose? Golden Goose is a luxury fashion designer that makes intentionally distressed sneakers. I am not making this up. They charge $500 for high end beat up sneakers with a star on them. Yes this is real. Yes they are kind of dope. Yes I have some. Taylor Swift wears them. DON'T JUDGE ME. Anyway, the year is 2016 and they are making ~100mm a year in Italy. Despite its domestic success, by 2016, Golden Goose reached a pivotal point. They had a vision to move beyond being a vintage sneaker brand, aiming for global expansion. Another PE fund owned them, and Carlyle was interested. What does Carlyle see? The sneaker trend was exploding in the luxury market around the mid-2010s. With a customer survey revealing over 70% brand awareness in Europe and 50% in the U.S. and China, it was clear Golden Goose had massive potential for worldwide growth. The interesting part is this brand awareness was almost all word of mouth and organic celeb endorsement. Carlyle buys them for 400mm. Carlyle's strategy? Focus on regional teams well-versed in key markets, forming essential local partnerships. This strategy enabled Golden Goose to make significant inroads into markets like China, South Korea, Japan, and the U.S. Carlyle also courted celebrity after celebrity with entire trunks of golden goose. They didn't do paid ads; they played to their strengths. Let the celebrities do the talking for them (they already were) on a larger scale. Finally, the fact that the sneakers were ratty created more public discourse, which created more brand awareness, which created more sales. The results? Impressive! Golden Goose's EBITDA soared from €32m in 2016 to €83m in 2019. Their stores grew from seven to almost 100, and direct-to-consumer sales rocketed from 10% to 45% within just three years. Let's talk about the tailwinds Carlyle probably saw: -The instagramification of fashion (luxury brands generally expanding) -The rise of casual wear (no more loafers / suits means we have to flex while being casual) -The rise of the distressed look What was the outcome? CARLYLE SOLD IT FOR $1.4B. What an exit. Who knew there was so much money in ratty sneakers.
10
17
2
174
71,457
Ben Tiggelaar 🟠 retweeted
Level Shifts: Thoughts on scaling a SMB👇 When you are growing, oftentimes new people will join the team and there is not clarity around a role, clarity around company best practices/principles, and clarity around core values/vision. You see this more when a company goes through a level shift. These transformational changes happen at predictable points. What worked at one level, won't work at the next. This causes frustration with new team members b/c the clarity is not there , and also existing team members b/c what used to work does not work anymore. Much like a video game, it's a different game at each level. I think it's a different game at each level and you have to expect a change when you buy a business when you level up to the next level. Nothing formal here and its just an observation (that a mentor told me about in the past) Here are some levels in which the company shifts: Level 1 : 0-10 Employees (Nimble Phase) Level 2: 11-30 Employees (Foundation Phase) Level 3: 31-100 Employees (Scale Phase) Level 4: 101-300 Employees (Fly Phase) 1️⃣ Level 1 (Nimble Phase): 0-10 You can really just freestyle it with the team as the leader. Picture a pickup basketball game where as a team, you communicate and give each other feedback. During this time, if actions and activities do not align with the plan, you can clarify it. 🔵 EBITDA Margins will be high when you approach 9 team members, b/c you don't have a built-out leadership team. So if you are buying a business that you want to scale with 9 employees, expect to add positions that don't generate gross profit and burden you're SG&A going forward. 🔵This phase is super fun b/c the team is small, and you are in the foxhole together building something special. 🔵IMO, it's more efficient to communicate organizational structure and standards during this phase vs. spend time writing it down. The reason is there are going to be many changes as you work things out to scale. IMO, don't over-systematize in this phase. ⚠️ Beware of the HUSTLE Leader, with a team of helpers in this phase. Sometimes this leader gets the team up to the next level. This is a big risk in buying a business when this person leaves. I call it hustle b/c the owner is Hustling..doing everything. We call it a reverse Hustle addback...its costly to replace an owner that is a beast. 🔵 You can get by not defining and creating clarity on paper b/c as the leader you can keep tabs on the team, and the critical drivers, and have one-on-one conversations on the way things should be done b/c you are less than 10 people on the team. 🔵 Define Style = Heavy one-on-one communication with limited writing down. 🔵 When you have 10 people, 3 people are key. Prices Law: square root of a domain is responsible for 1/2 of the output 2️⃣ Level 2 (Foundation Phase): 10-30 In this phase, an owner/CEO can't do one-on-ones with everyone. You have to start to build some leaders around you b/c you can't juggle all the balls. 🔵 New people coming on may stray from the way things are done and this could cause some friction b/c things are not written down. When this happens, its an opportunity to document 1. Best Practices 2. Roles and Responsibilities 3. Core Values...etc. The initial tendency is to correct and give feedback...but you are not freestyling anymore, so you need to turn that effort into documenting the former 3 things and also provide clarity. You need to also turn your attention to getting in getting the 5 people (see Prices law below) in this phase cohesive and aligned. 🔵 Read the book "Advantage", get the leadership team cohesive. 🔵You still know everyone's names but you can't lead them all. 🔵 When you have 30 people, 5 are key. Who are your 5. Prices Law: square root of a domain is responsible for 1/2 of the output 3️⃣ Level 3 (Scale Phase): 31-100 🔵 What worked at Level 1 for sure not work at the end of Level 3. You can't keep pulse on everything and you have to empower your leadership team. 🔵 Read the book "Traction" ..about EOS 🔵 Setting up a Goal system is key. We like OKRs. Rocks in EOS are good also. Same thing essentially. 🔵 Knowing the critical drivers (leading indicators) and tracking it via a scoreboard is key. Tracking the lagging indicators (results) are key also. 🔵 When you have 100 people, 10 are key. Who are your 10? Prices Law: square root of a domain is responsible for 1/2 of the output. 🔵 EBITDA Margins might go down b/c of the SG&A increase as you put in the structure and also bring on those 10 key leaders/individual contributors. 4️⃣ Phase 4 (Fly Phase): 101-300 🔵 This is when you realize the value you have created. 🔵 Read the Great Game of Business ⚠️ The important thing in this phase is to not get bureaucratic. This is hard b/c as the founder / CEO, you can't spin all the plates. You have to trust your leadership team. 🔵 You won't know everyone's name and how many kids they have. 🔵 Try to simplify the elements of EOS and equip everyone to make decisions and produce the activity to drive value. 🔵 Try to set more "meta" systems in this phase. Don't over SOP it and over do it. Make business a game. People love to play games and they want to win. Embrace this core truth throughout the organization. 🔵 When you have 300 people, 17 are key. Who are your 17. Prices Law: square root of a domain is responsible for 1/2 of the output Takeaways: -Each time you hire someone, you get the ability to "raise your average". This means the "3" when you are 10 employees, don't have to be part of the "17" when you are at 17. -That part of continuing giving verbal feedback after the level change when 1. Best Practices 2. Role and Responsibilities and 3. Core Values are not documented and there is not cohesiveness amongst the leadership team is very important. You can't freestyle it anymore and you need to create clarity. Use energy to create that clarity vs. playing wackamole with giving feedback. Work on building the machine. -Part of the game at each level is finding the right key leaders for that level. For example, who are your 5 when you are 30 employees. You need to establish a cohesive team. You need to overcommunicate clarity. - If you are trying to scale from 1 to 300 employees. I like to think of it as: Level 1 : 3 Cohesive Leaders (Nimble Phase) Level 2: 5 Cohesive Leaders (Foundation Phase) Level 3: 10 Cohesive Leaders (Scale Phase) Level 4: 17 Cohesive Leaders (Fly Phase) Let's say, you are looking at a company that has 30 employees. One of my favorite questions in due diligence is to ask is tell me about your top people in the company that you could not lose. Before asking the question I would have figured out in my head what the square root of the total employees were. In this case I would have guessed that he would say 4-5 names (b/c the owner is 1). Spend time understanding who those people are, what they do, and what their limits are. When you have a collection of leaders there that would be the leaders when the company is 100 employees, you have a 💎 Big Takeaway = 1. PEOPLE MATTER 2. A COHESIVE TEAM IS THE SECRET 3. PEOPLE WANT TO WIN GAMES Any other takeaways here that you have in going through different growth phases..comment below RT if you like this
12
11
6
98
40,164