I am too deep in the AI Agent rabbit hole. But I promise to bridge it with @Logos_network, privacy, local-first and all the stuff we care about Finally submitted for @EthPrague Your AI Agent Works for OpenAI. I am LMAO fixing it. * LMAO = Logos Module for Agent Orchestration

This is a culmination of my work with Jimmy so far:) @Logos_network Blockchian LEZ (Logos Execution Zone) program implementing Multisig wallet. While working on that we realized we need a bit more magic in LEZ, so we also built a SPEL - Smart Program Engine for Logos

Everyone and their dog is now talking about Network State, Cyberstates, Parallel Societies, Hubs, Zones, Communities and all the other forms of people coming together. The latest piece on this is from @VitalikButerin - Let a thousands societies bloom. And it's a good one! I think he hits on some crucial points - * We need to be free to experiment. * It is not that hard to start a Hub. * Diversity/plurality is great and it should be "cheap" to exit and switch communities. * People are in the state of "low agency" and we cannot expect everyone to be an active participant . Thisaligns really well with what we are trying to build with @Logos_network Circles. First, build a tribe - find something that brings people together and build trust. Hopefully, that leads to creation of "hubs", which can then grow into zones (I am just using the terminology from the article here). Václav Havel proposes this as a post-democratic model in The Power of the Powerless (which I've been quoting lately) and @jarradhope_ specifically analyzes the tech stack needed for these experiments in Farewell to Westphalia. For me, there are a few thoughts/questions that always arise when I start thinking about the topic: 1. The combination of endless rules and social media as an outlet for frustration is a major reason people don't "get off their butts and actually create these alternative cultures and environments" (to quote Vitalik) - people are frustrated, but instead of going and doing something meaningful, they just scroll and argue with other anons online - not everybody, but majority - me included 2. Finding the "aligning topic" and/or "winnable issue" - as we call it in Circles - is not easy. We (engineers, builders) are prone to solving everything with pure tech and overestimating our ability to execute and underestimating the complexity of making "a change in society" 3. People often say "capitalism failed" or "see where liberalism got us", but I am not so sure we actually know, because we have been progressively tightening our boundaries and space for experimentation for a very long time and, we are quite far from liberal democracy right now (in my personal opinion) 4. Many of these experiments will fail, and failure is not something we are expected to allow - you are not supposed to "fail" at school, you are not supposed to fail at work, or you get fired. Many people with potentially interesting ideas will just not engage because of the risk of failure Anyway, we must experiment and we must find the ways to experiment. Ad-hoc communities, parallel institutions, and tribes were always part of our society until we allowed everything to be focused around the "individual" and broke them down. We need community to live a healthy and happy life - the saying "it takes a village to do XYZ" exists for a reason. We are not resilient enough individually to go through life - we need the belonging and support of other truly aligned individuals. What kinds of communities, parallel societies, hubs do you want to be part of?