really useful chart for the people who believe an increase in global population reliably and mechanically produces a corresponding increase in realized genius
it’s weird how this “one time” tax solves paying for kids healthcare. i guess maybe the kids only need one year of healthcare
absolutely hilarious.
the funniest part of the picture by far is that northern ireland is also colored differently and is the same size as the scary "what if" scenario
Wow, imagine if Ireland had a geographically concentrated minority with a blended national identity that connects them to a militarily superior power with a history of worsening famines in their country, and that militarily superior power stoked violent unrest among that minority for years in order to impose partition on a state fleeing the imperial center?
Now people should celebrate. An Indian company exits SSL/TLS business. Your witch-hunt and demand for impossible standards has worked.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Generating private keys with more than 3 digits for a world-trusted root certificate authority are not impossible standards. Badly generated keys may endanger - and have - the whole internet by breaking the most important encryption protocol.
theregister.com/security/2026/…
cloudflare.com/learning/ssl/w…
in fairness, Miguel *chose* to be an american. whereas the guy depicted on that ancient "iwo jima" monument was prolly just born as an american. and what's more, the iwo jima figure almost certainly held retrograde, unacceptable views on race, sex and trans acceptance.
in all of those senses, Miguel is much much more of an American than some random racist on an old war memorial.
and so why shouldn't Miguel take offense at this bigoted country raising monuments to racists who were barely even american while there are no monuments raised to men like Miguel, who are the best americans and literally built this country.
just the idea of this makes me want to TP this lady's house.
How should Christians approach Halloween?
Christians tend to fall into four different camps when it comes to participating in Halloween:
- Total abstinence
- Full participation
- Partial participation
- Redemptive participation
Some abstain from Halloween altogether. Others fully participate in the festivities, while some enjoy the family fun without participating in the glorification of evil.
I believe the better alternative is redemptive participation.
My mom has set this example for me for years. She uses Halloween as an opportunity to share the gospel by attaching Bible verses to candy, making Scripture signs for her front lawn, and sharing the love of Jesus with the families who come to her door.
As she says, “What other time of year do you have people coming to your home and asking you for something? This is like the easiest evangelism opportunity possible.”
A night associated with darkness can actually be an opportunity to shine the light of Christ.
this is mean.
also, on the topic of cyber phishing emails, i have literally never received a genuine one. i only ever get the few a month my own IT creates and sends to try to trap me.
you have to love that this guy is a fat tub of lard bc his “walk around the world” was to fly into a town and drive to a place and then walk a little while and then drive and fly back out.
I left my 8-year-old son behind 28 years ago to walk around the world. Now I'm about to finish - but will my son forgive me? trib.al/NM4dzpP
we are unwilling to do the things that are necessary to maintain civilization and so the formerly common, unremarkable benefits of civilization will wither and die
another point of agreement!
because they can be mothers, women should not have to face full accountability for their actions and so, accordingly, clearly cannot be allowed hold positions of authority and responsibility or make important decisions for themselves and others.
absolutely extraordinary.
clearly driven by the fact that migrant rape is unmentionable in polite society but one wonders, is the thought process:
1) a bankshot approach like: well, we can't actually address migrant rape directly bc that's racist so we'll do a ton of "consent" stuff targeted at the white native population in the hopes that will trickle down to the migrants as a general sense of "consent is really really important here, maybe i shouldn't just rape when i want to!"
or is it,
2) the lefties in charge are fully incapable of engaging with reality and so think the rape epidemic is genuinely driven by horrid irish grandparents hugging their (apparently bi-racial, lol) grandkids without consent?
Justine's Social Media Video Critiques remain amazing.
#SocialMediaVideoCritique
This is a nice re-enactment of "talking baby scenes," popularized in films like BABY GENIUSES and LOOK WHO'S TALKING.
- The set design is large-scale to de-emphasize the size of the adult actresses here.
- The chairs are very bulky, such that the actresses seem almost swallowed by the furniture, like children.
- The wardrobe on the actresses is amorphic and a few sizes too large for them, giving the audience an increaased "small child" or "infant" impression.
- The make-up is simple and the lighting is broad, resulting in a smoothing effect on their faces, much like that of a baby.
- The final "baby" element is dialogue that ends to repeat, and at times have a circular motion. This is an interesting way of see-sawing the audience between the baby babble that the adults hear in these films, and the cohesive words heard by the babies alone.
- The "Easter egg" here is the placement of baby bottles with "UNWELL" printed on the side. It's a nice subliminal touch by the director to impress on the viewer that the babies have some kind of sickness.
Fin.
i wonder how these two strong, independent women who feel totally fine about women leaving their marriages bc slay queen , she can do better feel about older rich successful men leaving their wives to marry twenty somethings.
prolly they are supportive bc if you can do better you should and you can always do better, lol, slay king
this is obviously correct provided the California government makes a solemn pinky swear that they are only going to rob the billionaires this one time and never again. clearly, without the pinky swear the temptation would always be there to return to the well but a pinky swear is inviolate
Replying to @gabriel_zucman
Either the tax is annual – and in that case it generates revenue annually, and some billionaires leave.
Or the tax is one-time – in that case it generates revenue in just one year, and there is no incentive to leave.
It can’t be both at the same time.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Billionaires can leave based on beliefs the one-time tax signals future annual ones, even if it stays one-time—yielding lost income taxes without annual wealth revenue. This models uncertainty, a standard approach.
nber.org/papers/w35899
lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis…




































