Christian. Husband. Father. Friend. American. Texan. Fightin’ Texas Aggie ‘92.
The Woods
Joined February 2021
- Tweets10.7K
- Following1K
- Followers1.7K
- Likes35.1K
Texas A&M hired the wrong coach. No discipline. Hard headed.
We could have just kept Jimbo for 4-5 win season.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Oh would you look at that? Jennifer Welch is sorry.
Sorry she lost sponsorships.
I hope they ALL cancel her show.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
I call on @mayes_middleton @DonHuffines @bofrench @KenPaxtonTX @LeighForTexas @smithfortx @JohnMessingerTX @kevinpyeary and GOP State Rep candidates in at least Harris, Tarrant, Williamson, Dallas, Bexar, and Brazos to file to do manual paper recounts and to start doing the investigations of potential illegal alien voting and/or ballot harvesting that can be challenged in election contests.
Doing manual paper recounts confirms whether electronic cheating occurred or not. But maybe even more importantly, it extends the deadline for filing election contests, giving us time to verify whether there was systemic cheating via illegal votes or ballot harvesting.
Last night, I was at a meeting where I talked to two election judges in Montgomery County who said that they saw for the first time a number of non-English speakers with new IDs voting, which they suspected were illegals voting with fake IDs. If it happened in red Montgomery County, think what happened in the big blue counties of Texas.
Before we go analyzing these "results," we need to verify whether they were real or fraud. Texas law shows the way. Candidates and their campaigns have to lead and pay for the verification for it to have any effect.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
We Texans demand an audit ASAP
TEXAS....
@GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @DanPatrick @tedcruz
@TexasGOP
We did not LOSE this election. Get to fucking work.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
TEXAS...DON'T JUST DEMAND AN AUDIT AND A RECOUNT...DEMAND AN OVERTURN, A NEW ELECTION!
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Greg Abbott got 4.65 million votes in 2018 and won. He got 4.4 million in 2022 and won. He got 4.5 million in 2026 and lost by nearly 10 points. Republicans didn't suddenly stop showing up. Democrats turned out in massive numbers. These numbers are fascinating.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Just crazy that 2,848 counties flip to Democrats out of a total of 3,109 counties.
I’m sorry…what did the Democrats campaign on? Orange man bad.
No election fraud. Nothing to see here folks.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
🚨 THE 15% BAND ISN’T A COINCIDENCE. IT’S A FORMULA.
For every 1,000 Trump votes in 2024… only ~850 stayed Republican in 2026. The other 150 landed on the Democrat side.
Same ratio. Every state. Senate and Governor. Red states, blue states — didn’t matter.
R² = 0.88. Drop any state and the multiplier barely moves.
That’s not a “swing.” That’s an algorithm.
Paper ballots. Hand counts. Poll books vs. votes cast. NOW.
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Stolen Elections / The 85% - 15% Algorithm is Found
Across 59 Key Races - the SAME formula was used:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
It’s unfortunate @Chewy won’t acknowledge …
Don’t forget @Chewy
Multiple episodes’ show notes list Chewy as a sponsor with a dedicated promo link, typically something like:
• Chewpanions.chewy.com/ivehad…
• or variations such as Chewy.com/hadit
Examples include episodes such as “Creeps for Christ” (January 2026), “Big Feelings, Little Men” (February 2026), and “The Pettysburg Address” (August 2026), among others. The standard offer is usually $20 off the first order plus free shipping for new customers (minimum purchase required). 
Podcast sponsorship trackers (e.g., Grep.FM) also list “I’ve Had It” among shows that have declared Chewy as a sponsor, and ad-intelligence data has identified Chewy in the show’s advertiser mix.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Hey @Chewy
You need to either disassociate yourselves from these demons or, be prepared to lose millions of dollars in revenue.
Signed
American pet lovers.
Podcasters Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan can't stop laughing at the thought of digging up Charlie Kirk's corpse and "doing it" again to him.
After laughing for 30 seconds straight, the women falsely claimed that Tyler Robinson was a 'MAGA person.'
They will celebrate your death, laugh uncontrollably, and still be fully convinced they're the "good guys."
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Four days ago I said the Grok Bot limit wasn't a bug.
This week it got worse, not better.
Joel Blackman runs a six-figure marketing agency on Grok Bot. He went to bed at 28% of his weekly usage and woke up 8 hours later at nearly 60%. 40 credits gone while he slept.
He's not alone. One Premium user burned 57% of the week in 2 hours and hit 85% after one day. Another says Premium "is now more like a demo."
In the video below Joel says the part SpaceX won't like: he'd happily pay $499 for a bigger plan. What he won't accept is the same task costing more credits than last week, with no number anywhere telling him what one task costs.
That's the real problem. You can't budget against a meter you can't read.
So before your next reset, make the bot show you where it went.
Paste this into Grok Bot:
"List every routine, group chat and bot that used credits in the last 24 hours. For each one show how often it ran, roughly what share of my usage it took, and whether it did any useful work. Flag anything that ran on a timer with nothing to do. Show me first, change nothing until I confirm."
Is SpaceX charging more per task, or are our bots just burning more than we think?
Your Grok Bot limit wasn't a bug.
12 days ago Elon bragged that people use it more every week, not less. Great for growth, terrible for a flat monthly plan. Every extra hour your bots ran, SpaceX paid for it.
Now it doesn't. Same plan, the meter just runs faster.
I checked my own setup after this. Most of my usage wasn't work. It was bots re-reading long chats and routines firing on a timer with nothing to do.
Cutting that is the only raise you're getting.
How fast did yours hit the wall?
Chip Abernathy retweeted
I love Grok. Grok Bot is the best AI product I’ve ever used and this is still true today. But based on the single-day usage I’ve burned through today on an Ultra subscription having done what I’ve done today, I couldn’t recommend Grok to anyone in good faith over other options on the market.
Is Anthropic losing money serving their models? Maybe. But for consumers today, their subs give considerably more usage per dollar, and the models are better.
Hope the team can figure this out fast. I truly can’t believe im at 8% on an ultra sub in one day just from asking simple chat questions and doing simple routines. Prob would’ve been 2-3% before the nerf.
Chip Abernathy retweeted
is it just me or did grokbot get way dumber overnight?
response quality went to crap, can't even stick to my usual report format anymore
wouldn't be surprised if xAI quietly swapped in some random cheap model
Chip Abernathy retweeted
Woke up at 61% on day one with nothing running and a few tasks later I’m at 100. Never happened before. Something is definitely happening with my account usage and 6 days is like an eternity. I’ve got a ticket number and no bots. 😩 @SpaceXSI @cursor_ai
