chillu (@chillu) profile picture

No longer active here. See you at @chillu@mastodon.nz and @chillu23.bsky.social

Wellington, NZ
Joined August 2007
Photo by chillu (@chillu)Photo by chillu (@chillu)Photo by chillu (@chillu)Photo by chillu (@chillu)Photo by chillu (@chillu)Photo by chillu (@chillu)
chillu retweeted
here's the argument some ai lab employees are making - they genuinely believe what they're working on might kill everyone - they continue to work on it because if this thing gets built it should be by responsible people like them - the reason they do money things like selling enterprise deals and IPOing is solely to fund this effort if this is all true then why is employee equity a thing? if you want to tell this story of being terrified of what you're building it doesn't work when there's a clear profit motive it's particularly weird when people vest and then leave and write a tirade about how these companies are bringing the end of everything if you want to act like this is the manhattan project, those scientists didn't have equity in something that gives them generational wealth you don't get to say something bad is happening while profiting off it and also being seen as the good guy. one of these has to go
183
346
46
4,700
193,047
this meeting could have been an MCP invoked search of our company’s internal knowledge base that aggregates data from virtually every service we use behind a unified retrieval layer and provides a streamlined interface for extracting critical business insights
94
548
37
6,857
270,577
You can outsource work but not your understanding
42
79
18
716
62,917
"I never thought they would cut MY cycleway," sobs councillor who constantly campaigns to cut cycleways. – at Wellington City, New Zealand
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
4
23
238
11,325
chillu retweeted
It has now been more than a year since Christopher Luxon has been interviewed by Q+A, including his entire tenure as PM. We hope he'll agree to be interviewed soon.
389
202
88
873
155,408
We put together a careful $270m 3-year plan for new regional public transport investments and last week the government decided to contribute zero dollars towards it. Instead they redirected NZTA funding away from public transport to roads. Many basic projects are now at risk. 1/
49
98
17
453
38,829
We literally decided to recreate our very own GFC. Great work everyone.
3
18
1
77
2,236
debugger console.log
49
1,467
99
12,134
747,401
A classic case of someone who knows the cost of everything & the value of nothing - a conservation minister who thinks it may be cost effective to let #NZ endangered species become extinct. On that basis, we could lose #kakapo, #kiwi & countless other species unique to NZ.
2
226
25
785
32,115
Anyone who says ‘the ETS will fix transport emissions, we don’t need fuel economy standards or price incentives for EVs’ is simply ignoring reality. We don’t have time for this nonsense.
98
38
4
185
18,954
If you have the time and money for a judicial review right now, a time when NZ is reopening oil and gas exploration, our natural environment is under severe threat and we have a dire housing crisis, why use it to oppose more space for inner city housing? thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350304…
7
11
2
81
4,673
The main reason we’re building @linear this way was that as we looked back our time in working in classic hypergrowth companies like Airbnb, Uber & Coinbase and realized: 1) the very best work was always created and created fast by very small teams 2) adding too many people too quickly to the company dilutes the culture and makes the company a mess and often leads to multiple re-orgs in a year. That energy could be spent better by building in a more focused way. Instead of thinking of scaling teams, you should be curating teams. Adding, changing, removing with patience. Some benefits of growing the headcount slowly: - Easier to retain and grow the culture in a thoughtful way - Easier to keep talent bar high, and focus hiring truly excellent folks - Easier to build high quality with less people - Easier to move faster with less people - With less but high quality folks you need less management and processes, almost none - Forces you to be more focused, making sure you just focus on the important things - Less time spent in hiring, hr, people, etc drama - Costs less, easier to extend runway or become profitable early on like we have The downside is mostly that you have less bandwidth to work on many things at once, and some people and founders have to stretch a lot more and be more involved as you only have 0-1 layers between everyone and you.
Linear headcount by round 2019 Seed - 3 founders 2020 Series A - ~8 2023 Series B - ~37 (2024 Today - 57) Aiming to grow as we fast as we have while keeping the headcount growth reasonable
22
35
8
682
127,436
chillu retweeted
Prevent macbook theft with this one simple trick!
80
581
48
11,917
545,104
chillu retweeted
I view everything I work on through that One Developer Framework lens. Not interested in tooling, approaches, or concepts that demand a team of thinly-sliced specialists to tick. One developer must be able to understand/use it all. From Hello World to IPO! Let's go, nerds 😀
22
32
9
746
64,570
In @_chloeswarbrick's State of the Planet speech today, the @NZGreens Party co-leader criticised the coalition government for "knowingly increasing inequality: shredding fair pay agreements, cutting back benefit increases and handing 2.9 billion dollars to landlords."
19
160
20
620
33,157
The primary way ChatGPT helps me with writing tasks is I ask it to produce a first draft, and it's so terrible that I go "jesus, I can do better than THAT" and throw it away and write the whole thing from scratch.
35
408
82
5,556
337,204
Every developer has something running on AWS they can't find to turn off right?
280
89
78
2,913
457,482
Ask ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 - which does it pick? (by @Leniolabs_)
371
747
481
8,947
2,277,320