Pinned Tweet
Tom Brady: loses a playoff game and drives home in his million dollar car to his million dollar home to his world famous international model wife and has six super bowl rings.
Me: hahaha what a loser
Nate. H retweeted
there has never been a better time to pull out this image
Nate. H retweeted
The same people who voted to block datacenters in their states will be angry at Google for building datacenters overseas instead of in their states. They will call it a failure of capitalism.
Mark my words they will do this and never feel an ounce of cognitive dissonance.
$GOOGL WILL INVEST $15 BILLION IN MALAYSIA IN 2027 & 2028, FOR DATA CENTER CAMPUSES, CLEAN ENERGY, WATER SECURITY & WORKFORCE TRAINING: RTRS
Nate. H retweeted
On today's stock market crash:
As an investor, on days like today, you have to ask yourself one question: What fundamentally changed over the last 24 hours?
The shift in the fundamental backdrop cannot be attributed solely to the Midterm Election results; markets had already largely priced in the outcome.
So, what changed between yesterday and today? What is the fundamental reason for today's decline?
One of the most likely catalysts is growing concern about a potential "ban" on AI, or at the very least, severe regulation of the industry.
Over the last 24 hours, Democratic lawmakers have publicly called for restrictions on advanced AI development, including an outright "ban on artificial superintelligence."
Frankly, an outright ban will not happen.
Such a ban, if even possible to enforce, would effectively mean the US surrendering its position in the global AI race to China.
Does this mean AI is "over" or today's stock market crash marks "the end?" Absolutely not.
Rather, we believe we are witnessing a sudden shift in sentiment colliding with excessive levels of leverage, potentially triggering forced liquidations by several major institutional investors.
Therefore, today's downturn is more technical than fundamental. This is not to discount the concerns around regulation, they are legitimate. But price action right now does not look orderly or rational.
We are in the midst of the biggest technological revolution in human history.
Zoom out and remain calm.
Nate. H retweeted
does that say february 4th 2019
Nate. H retweeted
16 minute into a cooking video and this mf introduce an ingredient he overnight soaked marinated and refrigerated
Nate. H retweeted
In 1999 Clinton wanted to invest a portion of Social Security into the stock market. If we did that SS would be fully funded for, at minimum until 2056. Likely much longer than that.
But boomers said no because it was "too risky." So instead Trump had to literally start an entire new SS program to replace it with what we should've done.
Nate. H retweeted
Adam Silver looked at the unemployment rate and said fuck it start the season at 3pm
Nate. H retweeted
Boomers take a third of your paycheck to pay for their retirement while demanding infinite tax breaks for their McMansions.
Devouring young families to pay for their monthly casino trips.
“I’m old. I’ve paid my home off,” said Ray Warner, a 72-year-old Akron resident. “Why would I pay property tax?”
Across the country, homeowners are asking the same question and revolting against property taxes at a scale not seen in a half century.
politico.com/news/magazine/2…





































