
the average Cso, aka Mr Sweat đŠ I design, run, ship, lift, write. Building an eco farm in Transylvania, @dailysweatclub & https://xitter.cf/t.co/ofeVW0dhyH
Joined July 2013
- Tweets988
- Following982
- Followers1.6K
- Likes27.9K
cso retweeted
Not just PHP. Node.js has also announced security releases for October 21, with HIGH-severity vulnerabilities affecting its 26.x, 24.x and 22.x release lines.
If you run either stack in production, keep an eye on official advisories and apply patches promptly.
Security maintenance doesn't stop at your application code. Your runtime matters too.
Node.js advisory: nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerabiâŠ
cso retweeted
We placed the fruit fly brain inside Odyssey-3, a frontier world model.
The lilâ guy is now flying around totally imagined, simulated worlds all by itself đ«¶
day 1022 @dailysweatclub
new workout dropped:
walipini digging
need to go about 2m deep
will try 30-60 min per day, and maybe get it done in... 10ish days
(with rest /off days for gym/swim)
so good!
classic that should be revisited from time to time
been thinking about this for a while,
the clear pattern seems to be
- design oriented people are absolutely excited and think all this AI stuff is a net positive because it supercharges their ideas and are convinced their vision for an experience is just better than whats currently out there and machines just absolutely suck at this
- techies feel like the end is nigh
I think both are right
maybe time to replace #lernToCode with #justLearnDesignBro
its funny when non design sensitive people show their demos â I made a design thing in 2 minutesâ its like colorblind people saying they are masters of painting because they made marks on a canvas
In the âjust shippingâ era they got away with it but the game is definitely changing now.
Im not sure how long until âdesign is deadâ but I think we have a few more years at least, in a pessimistic scenario, likely a lot more in an optimistic one
I'd call this a bubble in a bubble
Tech people somehow still think normies are not spinning up personal software already
They're not doing it in Claude Code in a terminal like tech people for sure
But their AI chat app is already doing it for them without them even realizing they're building personal software, like generating PDF reports, full web app dashboards and even entire web apps
That will keep getting more advanced and soon ChatGPT will just spin up a Photoshop clone (but ofc only if they need it, preferring to just do their photo edits for them)
Everyone will mostly use personal ephemeral software inside AI chat apps I think
Some software moats will remain like social media (community), ecommerce (think like Shopify and Stripe), etc but they will just be used by AI to build the personal software with
So maybe that's the point here, become a tool agents use to solve their user's problems and charge agents for it (like many are saying)
/continue-rant
(raw late night cant sleep iphone stream style)
why I think design in general is different compared to code and why itâs harder to give models and people âtasteâ
code has to work.
thats about it. on or off.
of course there are complexities but at the end of the day (almost) no user will go inspect the code and its intricacies.
whereas design is seen and felt by all, and everyone has an opinion on it.
good design is in the eye of the beholder, people rarely agree on whatâs good
There are people buying ferraris saying its hands down the best design while others think a prius is just a better one, for them a ferrari is just too loud, too obnixious.
which one is âbetterâ?
we care about design on a different level, its about emotional bonding, signaling and lots of context and nuance
all these bits are built into the product and all its details by people iterating thousands of times on it, massaging all of it together into a coherent package
the process needs a lot of decisions and each decision point combined with âgood tasteâ gets better, but with
âbad tasteâ, or âgenericâ aka ai safe middle ground taste it goes downhill
it can never become remarkable (past maybe a short term gimmick stage)
most of us know design by committee is the worst type of design, ending up in the worst products
( if youâre not sure what I mean check this - âthe bradleyâ youtu.be/aXQ2lO3ieBA )
probably most of us have seen people who just cant get out of their own way when making decisions
as an extreme,
some people hire others
(for lots of $$$ )
then fight them every step of the way
just to get what they initially wanted
I donât see how a nearly free, sycophantic LLM, that is drawn to averages will produce any decent work, especially in these kinds of hands.
Im talking absolutes, but we all have some âbad clientâ traits, or just simple
lack of knowledge
unless we learn ourselves
the LLMS only magnify these gaps.
gaps aka we become the bottleneck.
filling gaps, learning takes time,
takes $, and still that only gets you to âok workâ, theres a lot more steps to âgreat workâ
and ofc people will be able to copy great work, just as you can buy didibao shoes that look like adidas, or even a perfect copy fake adidas, but enough people still buy adidas.
for the brand, for the promise of getting something of quality, meaning all the coherent decisions that went into it, from material to sewing, to small design details.
and maybe a face, someone they know and respect who says
âyeppp this is goodâ
and we didnât even hit the meaning area yet (that I think will grow massively) , when you just want to give certain people money because you believe in them and want to contribute or help somehow, just help them do more of what theyâre doing (which might be the purest ways of making a living)
All this to say I dont see how the âbradley generatorsâ will erase all this any time soon.
And indies have a head start on all this because they are used to adapting
and everyone is âindieânow
but besides software Iâm also building an eco farm and make furniture- so strong opinions loosely held lol
cso retweeted
Iâm seeing:
- people saying charge less
- but people having success charging $2000 / month
- people saying donât sell to devs
- but people having success selling to devs
- people saying software is dead
- while building and maintaining several software products
TLDR: đ€·đ»ââïž
Replying to @levelsio
agree the bar will be raised for all but I think âpro developedâ things will still have an edge.
whatever normies do
pros will do better
and there will be a market for it.
professions and descriptions might completely change and they might be unrecognizable
but the difference will be palpable
and people will pay for this edge
rather than do all themselves.
Current example
(iâm a designer work with 4-5 clients at a time various industries shapes sizes, aprox 30 a year with a few long termers)
I give all my clients full llm access and while they love to play around, most of them tap out from overwhelm in decision making within the first rounds.
I think designers will have an edge here, weâre used to thinking through tonnes of decisions and managing teams of devs - which are now agents.
Even former indie devs I see mentally tap out sometimes, the process used to be slower and more focused on grinding, and they would get their joy from that.
now its like hyper decision making on 50 topics in parallel and you need to know when to stop, when not to overbuild, think strategically and deliver clean, coherent products.
While people can learn that in theory, I donât think thatâs a skill everyone wants to develop.
The ones who get absolute joy from this and do it 40+ hours a week (designers, maybe theres other groups too) will always have an edge compared to beginners who do this a few hours a week
yes a few hours a week will be good enough, until when itâs not and everything is next level.
easier to call it luck
than to dig deep
and put in the hours, days, years.
this might actually be
the root of all mysticism.
of course there are lucky people,
but not relevant.
put in the work,
develop the skills
sweat daily.
this is the way
@dailysweatclub
Why your 3 hard workouts a week aren't enough:
- Exercise and physical activity are not the same thing: walking, a walking treadmill at work, parking farther away
- You are not reaching optimal health by training hard and sitting the other 23 and a half hours
- Target 150-180 minutes a week of physical activity, or 30 minutes a day of low to moderate intensity
- A nurse on her feet at 15,000 steps covers most of it. At a desk you have to add hours of walking on purpose
@DrAndyGalpin on @hubermanlab
holymoly
Replying to @marckohlbrugge
The new X webviews on iOS and Android will let you expand websites in-line with the post. Soon we'll support authentication directly into them. Start building!
cso retweeted
everyone will not just do the same thing, everyone will not vibe code all the tools they pay for now...
"A society which is insane and unsure of itself cannot allow that to happen. It says: âEverybody must join, everybody must work, everybody must belong.â And then freedom disappears because, as a matter of fact, the anxiety is if you say: âWell, you don't have to join. There are conditions under which you can go out. Then a lot of people would get together and say: âBut what would happen if everybody quit?â I ask: âWhat would happen if everybody decided to take American Airlines flight 3 to New York tomorrow?" Well, they just wouldn't get on" -Alan Watts
cso retweeted
walking or jogging reduce depression about as much as therapy and have a much larger effect than SSRIs
the largest effect in the entire analysis was from dancing
bonus - if you do things you really believe in you are happy when people copy
often you actually want them to copy the easy things so they exist, and you can move on to harder challenges most avoid.
onwards
This âdonât build in publicâis such a weird take I started seeing more of
Yes, now with AI itâs easier than ever for people to copy your work
But they always will be one step behind. Itâs not like youâre sitting still, not iterating after your v1
And whatâs the alternative? Building in private? Not shipping your work to customers? Hiding?
Thatâs coming from a position of weakness imho
Good luck building a great product nobody gets to use and provide feedback on
AI lets everyone move faster. You. But also your competitors. And straight up copycats
Relatively, not much has changed. You need to continue to keep momentum, keep shipping, gather feedback, iterate on that, build a network of peers who got your back, where you can go for advice, etc
Iâd put my money on someone doing that, in public, over someone iterating forever in private never shipping because itâs not ready yet and too easy to copy





















