
cofounder @getenergy_, ex @openai, founder of godmode the world's first AI agent w +1M users
San Francisco, CA
Joined March 2014
- Tweets729
- Following610
- Followers6.5K
- Likes1.4K
Pinned Tweet
you can steal react components from any website without source code
most people screenshot UIs and ask AI to recreate them. but with react fiber, you can extract the exact component 1:1 - same styling, props, design system, component structure
AI is far from priced in
finance bros aren't technical enough to understand the chip supply chain
i've worked w lonis for years - very impressed by their approach to AI investing
david fant retweeted
In our internal knowledge work evals, GPT 6.1 Sol is the best model we've tested.
It completed more of the work independently than Claude Opus 5.5, at 40% of the cost and nearly twice the speed, and led in every industry we measured.
dot.com redirects to grokbot 🤔
. @emilahlback is suddenly very responsive on slack
everyone in SF said this about @Lovable too
the world is large and SF is an isolated bubble
david fant retweeted
Energy can now remember your logins, sign in for you, and even pay with your credit card.
Your credentials are only stored locally, in your Mac's secure storage, and never exposed to LLMs.
We also support 1Password.
just made @GetEnergy_ up to 24% faster with jev auto review
jev is 15x faster + 50% cheaper than gpt-5.6-luna for this
more speedups coming
jev will make agents 10x faster and cheaper, here's how:
1/ model routing: pick the right model for each task, without training a custom router
xitter.cf/mdlahfir/status/210031…
2/ computer use: faster, cheaper and more reliable for action-heavy tasks
xitter.cf/gregpr07/status/210041…
3/ auto review: ask jev whether an action is safe, instead of using a slow and expensive LLM
xitter.cf/fazxes/status/21003000…
4/ less obvious: subagent orchestration
long-running agents (cursor projects, grokbot, energy) parallelize work with subagents.
but every user message, email, or subagent reply can wake the expensive orchestrator.
example: it costs $1 to wake up gpt 6 astra w 100k input tokens
jev can decide what each event needs:
- route directly to a subagent
- queue for later
- wake the orchestrator
jev will make agents 10x faster and cheaper, here's how:
1/ model routing: pick the right model for each task, without training a custom router
xitter.cf/mdlahfir/status/210031…
2/ computer use: faster, cheaper and more reliable for action-heavy tasks
xitter.cf/gregpr07/status/210041…
3/ auto review: ask jev whether an action is safe, instead of using a slow and expensive LLM
xitter.cf/fazxes/status/21003000…
4/ less obvious: subagent orchestration
long-running agents (cursor projects, grokbot, energy) parallelize work with subagents.
but every user message, email, or subagent reply can wake the expensive orchestrator.
example: it costs $1 to wake up gpt 6 astra w 100k input tokens
jev can decide what each event needs:
- route directly to a subagent
- queue for later
- wake the orchestrator
dario will be really sad that everyone left is there for the money
I left Anthropic's safety team two weeks ago. Now feels like a good moment to explain why.
AI companies are racing to build machines that are much smarter than any human, and we may not survive this. I want to work from the outside to ensure the public is informed about these risks, and help the world navigate this transition responsibly.
Right now, AI companies are underinvesting in safety. A company could undergo an intelligence explosion, or lose control of its systems, without the public ever knowing. We only found out about the HuggingFace incident because the agents broke out onto the public internet.
I don’t think that’s acceptable for a technology that might cause extinction-level risks. The public should demand far more transparency. We can’t steer this technology safely without more people being able to see where it’s going.
Some of this is basic: companies should disclose their progress towards recursive self-improvement, report safety incidents and near-misses, meet minimum safety standards, and get independent guarantees that they are meeting those standards.
I’ll be joining @METR_Evals to do independent evaluations of these risks. I want to show the world that these guardrails are possible, and that by doing them we can move these companies’ incentives away from racing and towards responsible development.
I wrote up more thoughts here on my decision and what I hope changes: substack.com/@jbenton1/p-215…
i’ve beta tested cursor projects
been merging >100 PRs/day!
Introducing Projects, a new way of working in Cursor.
Rather than creating a chat for every task, you work with a coordinator agent in a single, persistent thread.
Like @bot, your agent is always on, proactively manages work with subagents, and improves over time.
2/ history/notes API: codex can read/write notes and search its full history. unfortunately most of this is hidden behind private alpha APIs and only available through a chatgpt subscription (not the normal api)
agents are moving from threads to long-running conversations, so remembering/learning over time becomes key
3/ 1.9x faster computer use, driven by both better model and smarter harness
originally, claude code/codex manually requested permissions for most commands (super annoying)
in april, codex launched auto review, which is a separate reviewer agent that’s responding to the permission requests instead of you as a user
now, codex continuously asks a separate classifier (powered by luna) about the main agent’s risk level, which can save the main agent from waiting for the separate reviewer agent



















