
In favour of rearranging molecules for the benefit of humanity. 🔍Free to use Investor Search Engine 👉 https://xitter.gq/t.co/sOavHkRlBJ @shipshape_vc
Cardiff
Joined February 2022
- Tweets27.1K
- Following5.4K
- Followers1.1K
- Likes118K
Daniel S. retweeted
Labour cannot be trusted with national security.
That's it. That's the tweet.
BREAKING: Labour Government allows Communist China to reopen its secret police hubs, including operations in London - just 4 months after Peter Wai and Bill Yuen were jailed under the National Security Act for assisting a foreign intelligence service by ‘shadow policing’ Hong Kong dissidents (via @TheTimes @Geri_E_L_Scott) thetimes.com/article/0139081…
Daniel S. retweeted
It is a mystery why only the UK side of the North Sea is a declining basin while the Norwegians keep finding more and more oil and gas on their side of the North Sea.
🤔
Could this possibly be caused by our ban on new exploration?
Daniel S. retweeted
European economic self-destruction in one chart.
Replying to @I_D_A_U_
The widespread Dunkelflaute across Europe has led to high power prices. Ireland is particularly impacted by non availability of CCGT at Coolkeeragh in the North and Dublin.
Daniel S. retweeted
This is good, but I’m worried that Net Zero kills a lot of our potential here. New gas power generators for data centres are borderline impossible to build, and our dependence on wind gives us random, days-long collapses in electricity supply.
A common Westminster mistake is to look at big moments in US politics and assume the same battle lines will be drawn here. AI and the mid-terms are a good example of this.
The easy assumption is that a big polarising debate on data centres is about to hit the UK, just because it has in the US. But that ignores two important facts.
First, the government has watched the free-for-all in parts of the US, has learned lessons from it, and is setting out a different approach. We do need to secure grid connections for strategic data centres, and we are setting up a Ministerial Control Centre to do just that. But move too quickly without bringing communities with you, and people understandably start worrying about the impact on their area and asking what they’re getting in return. That's why we're putting protections in place, to prioritise data centres only where they meet the tests set out in our Data Centre Covenant published at the Budget.
This means data centres have to lower electricity bills for other users, minimise and report on water usage, support our reindustrialisation objectives and support UK sovereignty. And crucially, it means agreeing to the principle that local communities around new infrastructure should share in its benefits - both through jobs and wider support.
Second, our problem is not that we have an abundance of data centre construction that our politics needs to reckon with, it's that build out is slower here than it could be. 15 of the world’s top 20 largest data centre markets are in the US. None are in the UK. The pace of investment here is, frankly, too low for what we need to stay at the forefront as AI technology develops. High electricity costs and slow grid connections (thanks, Conservatives) mean we haven't been near the top of the list for investment, and too often we're reliant on AI infrastructure overseas. The Budget last week set out a new direction to change this for all business and households, but we can't turn this round overnight.
Data Centres today are essential infrastructure. They underpin much of everyday life in the UK, from banking and shopping, to public services, to helping doctors screen for diseases. AI makes that infrastructure even more important and as AI becomes more widely used across out economy, Britain will need more of the data centres that support it. But we won’t allow that growth to come at any cost. We’ll protect communities. And we’ll make sure local people benefit.
Daniel S. retweeted
The idea that the relationship needs “repairing” at all is a nonsense. It isn’t broken by anything other than the fact our leadership has become so weak they now see us as a target for a shakedown. If we developed a backbone and made them know this is unacceptable, it would stop.
These “modest” proposals include:
“monetary compensation as reparations from enslaving
nations, monarchies, churches, institutions, corporations and families, for loss of life and uncompensated labour, loss of liberty, personal injury, mental pain and anguish and gender-based violence” and
The “complete cancellation of
all CARICOM-European bilateral debt as a complementary mechanism to the
demand for monetary compensation”
Delusional
Daniel S. retweeted
I think AI will see two revolutions - the first speeds up how we do things. A 15 page investment report taking 4 weeks of research becomes 25 pages in one week.
The second will be realising that the old process is redundant - the report wasn't actually important, the idea was.
Just spent some time catching up with an old coworker, who now works at the VP level at a boutique investment bank
Was asking him about analyst use of AI and thought his insight was quite fascinating
More people are using AI now vs just few months ago, and it absolutely cuts down a lot of time from mundane tasks
Just tedious things like arranging logos on a deck or managing a contact log for investors would require analyst resources behind it.
Now an Associate or VP with Claude can just do it by themselves with minimal effort
However, the work hours have not gone down at all for the analysts. Since senior folks know about the capabilities of AI, they are now staffing analysts across more deals at any given time
Not only that, MDs are chasing after new mandates more often than before.
Directors are coming up with new tasks for their analysts, like maintaining tear sheets or comp sets on niche verticals. VPs are asking for more pages and trying to show more analysis to clients than before
In summary, the duration of any single task has gone down because of AI.
However, this has been offset with new work that the firm and group simply never had capacity to do before
Instead of reducing hours, it has opened up room for his group to chase after more revenue and provide better/faster work to existing clients.
Suspect this is also what is happening across many industries and companies, not just in banking or finance
Walked away with the reinforced belief that the entire job loss narrative of AI is just doomerism
Daniel S. retweeted
On the topic of reparative justice.
In June 1897, 2000 former slaves paraded in the Seychelles celebrating Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee, carrying Union Jack flags printed with the words ‘The Flag that sets us free.’
All been rescued by the Royal Navy from the East African slave trade.
In their public address, translated from Creole, they stated:
“Kindly, Sir, express to the Queen our thanks for our freedom and to England our gratitude to those English Sailors who were killed and wounded, fighting that we might be free.”
The slavery abolition Act had been enacted over six decades prior.
No it won't
This is bollocks
An apology for slavery will help build trust across the Commonwealth ft.trib.al/16J9wrD | opinion
Daniel S. retweeted
The sad irony of this is:
- the Leeds data centre is estimated to create 1,000+ jobs across the region
- its water needs are roughly equivalent to 5 moderately busy car washes
- and... it will use rainwater gathering, so a decent chunk of water needs are covered anyway
Objecting to it essentially makes the region poorer, for no real gain.
Daniel S. retweeted
We're in that weird phase between "this is terrible, no one wants them" and "this is terrible, everyone else has them".
Elon Musk says the lack of popularity for data centers is temporary because of the prosperity that is brought by them:
"The lack of popularity is where there aren't data centers and they think a data center will have a bad effect. Memphis is booming because of @SpaceX. The restaurants are full, the hotels are full, we're paying twice the prevailing wage people were earning before. We've also helped local schools. And the tax revenue the county and city are earnings is tremendous. I think this popularity thing is a temporary concern because there actually is tremendous prosperity that is brought by the data centers. Talk to the people in town and they feel it because their businesses are booming."
(via 33rd Annual Baron Investment Conference today in NYC)
Daniel S. retweeted
Canonically, the One Ring was forged before Eregion fell.
Also, the Dwarves of Khazad-dum never once thought about siding with Sauron.
It's amazing how the showrunners and their media shills are just blatant about how anti-canon the show is. First they tried to blow smoke up everyone's ass by saying "bAcK tO tHe BoOkS" and now they've given up.
Daniel S. retweeted
Here's some fuel for all the Europoor haters:
Germany just told us we'd have to fire one of our 3 founders to qualify for funding.
I was in talks with a German state-backed fund of fund managing billions, with one single mandate: invest in German funds to drive innovation and economic growth in the country.
They literally told me they like us a lot and are also impressed by our track record and performance so far, and even though not everyone in their team is a fan of our thesis, they believe in it.
But they passed for a whole different reason:
Because our all-male team of 3 people isn't "diverse enough" lol.
they literally told me: hire two more female partners (impossible on the economics of a fund our size), or let one of the three of us go to make room for a quota hire. do that, and they'd strongly consider investing.
I won't even get into how discriminatory this is toward men in the first place. nobody takes that seriously anyway, and honestly I don't care.
but what actually gets me is something bigger: as a German, I have to face the fact that the whole world continuing to laugh at Germany and overall Europe is completely justified.
a system that quietly kills the smallest, hungriest teams, the exact ones this money was created to support. and then everyone acts surprised that talent and capital keep leaving the country.
Daniel S. retweeted
Want to know why the EU doesn’t have a tech sector? 👇
“they literally told me: hire two more female partners (impossible on the economics of a fund our size), or let one of the three of us go to make room for a quota hire.”
Here's some fuel for all the Europoor haters:
Germany just told us we'd have to fire one of our 3 founders to qualify for funding.
I was in talks with a German state-backed fund of fund managing billions, with one single mandate: invest in German funds to drive innovation and economic growth in the country.
They literally told me they like us a lot and are also impressed by our track record and performance so far, and even though not everyone in their team is a fan of our thesis, they believe in it.
But they passed for a whole different reason:
Because our all-male team of 3 people isn't "diverse enough" lol.
they literally told me: hire two more female partners (impossible on the economics of a fund our size), or let one of the three of us go to make room for a quota hire. do that, and they'd strongly consider investing.
I won't even get into how discriminatory this is toward men in the first place. nobody takes that seriously anyway, and honestly I don't care.
but what actually gets me is something bigger: as a German, I have to face the fact that the whole world continuing to laugh at Germany and overall Europe is completely justified.
a system that quietly kills the smallest, hungriest teams, the exact ones this money was created to support. and then everyone acts surprised that talent and capital keep leaving the country.
Daniel S. retweeted
I don't mind paying these salaries if these people are the vet best people doing an incredible job.
But they're not are they?
Watch: A panel of NHS executives were left FLUSTERED when Rupert Lowe read out their salaries at a Select Committee hearing
Lowe told Sir Jim Mackey, boss of NHS England, that he was ‘making out like Dick Turpin!’ @RupertLowe10
It's almost certainly the case
But this entire deal is about the Labour party
There's nothing in it of value to the economy when put against the costs
Daniel S. retweeted
The Timothy Taylor’s rebrand is genuinely one of the most depressing I’ve seen. Terrible decision.
Daniel S. retweeted
Someone at BSG: the UK GDP could be lower still.
We are pleased to announce that the Rt. Hon. @JustinTrudeau has joined Oxford University’s Blavatnik School of Government as a Distinguished Fellow and member of the World Leaders Circle.
ow.ly/j4uK51047Z3
Daniel S. retweeted
YOU paid for this.
£200 MILLION of new trains are sitting in depot.
Wales ordered 36 new trains in 2018.
PROMISED for 2022.
Arrived in 2023.
Won’t be READY until late 2027.
Most don’t carry passengers, with less than HALF even passed testing.
The Empire State Building was built in 410 days. In the middle of the Great Depression.
New York could have built it THREE times by the time all of the trains will be in service.
No more excuses. No more delays. The trains must run NOW.
What do you think?
£200m taxpayer-funded trains sit barely used for three years bbc.in/4zneZbK






































