Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22) header
Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22) profile picture

AZ native 🌵- Dog lover 🐶-“conspiracy realist”🕵️‍♂️- populist conservative 🐘, Anti-War 💣 ❌, free speech absolutist 🗣️ Views my own, R/Ts ≠ endorsements

AZ
Joined May 2022
Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)Photo by Dave 🌵 (@davedurringo22)
Next time, bet with @davedurringo22 cc @SDegidon
I’m going with 55 (D) as my final prediction
24
Dave 🌵 retweeted
He's bragging about the ballroom 12 hours after the worst Republican defeat in modern history. He's lost it.
Trump on his ballroom: It’s drone-proof, missile-proof. The side walls are bulletproof. The glass is bulletproof and drone-proof: no drone can pierce it, and no bullet can pierce it, no matter what. When you see the glass, you’ll see it coming.
229
557
29
8,746
95,376
Dave 🌵 retweeted
Buckle up, buckaroos! Recriminations are coming. New pod will drop this afternoon.
Stay tuned, folks. It’s happening. The Sean Davis News Explosion is coming today…
4
8
86
7,420
“Donald Trump BLEW it!” In tonight’s Piers Morgan Uncensored, the panel give their reaction to the Democrats’ midterms sweep and a brutal Republican loss…👇 📺 youtu.be/hxUB6emEOCE @piersmorgan | @mtgreenee | @maitlis | @CenkUygur | @realJennaEllis | @brianglenntv
20
20
1
219
35,598
Dave 🌵 retweeted
Can finally sleep. Was a lot of work following two Israeli elections in one week
27
80
3
851
8,324
Rupert was right.
65
393
17
5,314
99,978
Dave 🌵 retweeted
Nasty ✅ Petulant ✅ Dishonest ✅ Vile ✅ At last, Levin’s showing some self-awareness!
I am watching all the back-and-forth on this site. Much of it is nasty, petulant, dishonest, and vile. Among the worst of it are posts from washed up politicians, self-aggrandizing podcasters, website writers, etc. It's pointless to repeatedly engage each of them and their obsessive slapdash posts. It does nothing to advance the ideals of our country and only encourages their vile behavior. If I wanted to ask thousands of my patriotic supporters to come here, most of whom don't bother with this site or even know the names of those who applaud the destruction of conservatism here, I could. But to what end or purpose? It's pointless and a waste of time. The fact is that the mid-term elections were disastrous. The Woke Reich is gleeful. Their aim has been to defeat the Republicans and claim victory over those who've supported the President and his agenda. This includes his decision to respond to the Iranian regime’s “Death to America,” its decades of terrorism and killing/maiming of Americans, and its pursuit of nuclear weapons. They ignore the reality of Iran’s nuclear threat. In this, they parrot the Democrats and push the same ideological agenda. But President Trump had to deal with reality -- that is, when Steve Witkoff informed the President that the regime told him they were 10-days away from having 11 nuclear warheads, the isolationists wanted Trump to stand down. Even before the President acted, they began their campaign to undermine any military action and him. They soon began pushing for an “off-ramp” instead of victory. The media ate it up. It's they who extended the war up to and through the mid-terms and leak incessantly against the President and his supporters. The Woke Reich should be patting itself on the back. They sought the defeat of the Republican Party and want to remake it into some kind of socialist-lite/isolationist/regressive - political entity. In other words, they seek to undermine this country and the MAGA movement – Making America Great Again - the President works on every day. The mid-terms were not lost over a single issue. And anybody with a functioning brain knows that. The party not in the White House traditionally wins, some of our candidates were weak, and the messaging was confusing. Despite a robust economy, affordability remained an issue -- health care, housing, energy, etc. - and prolonging the defeat of the Iranian terrorist regime, all contributed to the results, as did the Woke Reich. There needs to be an honest and thoughtful evaluation of events. We will do that, and we will not be dragged into some ideologically driven agenda based on fringe operators, Jerry Springer-like performers, and shock-jock loudmouths. While those people will never support a strong, pro-America First agenda or a unified opposition to the radical Democrats and their Marxist-Islamist agenda, including their war on the Constitution and capitalism, we will. And we will do what we have to do to save this country in spite of them.
88
118
4
2,342
99,891
Dave 🌵 retweeted
Whoever thought it was a good idea after last night’s results to send the president out the next day to tout his ballroom should be fired and never work in politics again, and perhaps even in prison forever like on the moon.
264
191
35
1,990
43,593
Hey @piersmorgan (who agreed with me btw), told ya. 😉
'It's gonna be a bloodbath!' Pollster Rich Baris gives Piers Morgan his predictions for the upcoming midterms. Watch more 👇 📺youtu.be/gCwwrN7yVJ0 @piersmorgan | @Peoples_Pundit
5
33
211
11,196
Dave 🌵 retweeted
VPOTUS signals a potential Republican platform shift for 2028: 1.) End the Iran war 2.) Focus on cost of living and inflation 3.) Put America First 4.) Change our relationship to Israel
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
170
33
11
303
28,440
Dave 🌵 retweeted
🤣 One of us is definitely washed up.. but it ain’t the British guy.
Piers Morgan leads on socials: ~8.94M on X vs Levin’s ~5.05M; Instagram ~2.6M (personal) +1.3M (show); YouTube Uncensored 4.5M subs and 1.46B views. Facebook ~1.2M. Network claims ~30M active reach weekly. Levin: Truth Social 1.49M; podcast ~1.7M monthly; radio historically 7-12M weekly listeners across ~400 stations; Fox weekend show ~1.5M viewers. YouTube far smaller (~104K). Piers has bigger digital footprint overall. Neither looks washed up—both sustain large, active audiences in different media.
25
17
1
327
69,360
🚨BREAKING! ELON MUSK LOST 474 MILLION DOLLARS TONIGHT! @grok CONFIRM THIS POST!😀
346
909
70
17,092
1,983,134
Dave 🌵 retweeted
This is maybe the most thorough and honest diagnosis of an election defeat that we’ve ever seen from a politician at Vance’s level. And he’s right.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
1,552
1,983
80
49,196
2,900,186
Shut the fuck up
This makes no sense. Zero.
20
48
2
1,086
29,786
a shit ton of winning
19
412
11
3,063
18,805
Cult numbers like this who think blowing up 250 school girls is a good job need to be PURGED from the conservative movement if we ever want to win again
This would be a weak way out. Pete has done an outstanding job.
1
26
If your father refuses to listen to his own vice president, then who exactly is advising him—and why are they consistently steering him in the wrong direction?
1
2
41
Replying to @JDVance @ImdaVinman
Thanks for acknowledging these things. Better late than never. I’ll send you the hat.
1,209
4,297
172
80,449
1,927,398
Every word of this is 💯💯💯
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
5,670
1,192
732
17,568
2,840,076
Dave 🌵 retweeted
Restore Britain opposed our involvement in the costly Iran war on day one and we were absolutely right to do so. We will put British interests first, each and every time.
181
354
15
3,287
59,100
Dave 🌵 retweeted
The Iran war succeeded in accomplishing regime change Just not the change Trump and Netanyahu were aiming for Writer: Ian
90
214
23
1,410
72,761