aman (@deepcodex0) header
aman (@deepcodex0) profile picture

Curious about systems, code, and consciousness. Notes to self.

Bengaluru, India
Joined July 2009
Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)Photo by aman (@deepcodex0)
PSA: Find your voter status (in Bangalore) easily. Pls RT. Final SIR data is out! But it's all a myriad of PDFs to comb through, captchas, slow sites, and changed part numbers so it is hard to find out your status as a voter! Over 4 days, I painstakingly reverse engineered the captcha, downloaded 10,000+ PDFs (over 100GB), OCR'ed them, converted to structured data, and then setup sir-bangalore.shantanugoel.c… so you can search for your status through name, voter id, house number etc in an instant without any captcha.
43
76
5
307
17,972
Elon Musk on why his companies move faster than anyone else. "I'm constantly addressing the limiting factor. Whatever the limiting factor is on speed, I'm going to tackle that. If capital is the limiting factor, I'll solve for capital. If it's not the limiting factor, I'll solve for something else." He then said something most managers never figure out: "If something is going really well and making good progress, there's no point in me spending time on it.The irony is if something's going really well, they don't see much of me. But if something is the limiting factor, they'll see a lot of me." He spends his time entirely on whatever is blocking the next step. Not on what's interesting or what he's best at. But on whatever is the bottleneck right now. Most leaders do the opposite... They gravitate toward what they're comfortable with and away from the hard problem.
54
376
47
3,248
379,388
If re-entry is your problem, @pre6ai can help! We can predict the following at hypersonic and supersonic - - Mach - Pressure - Temperature - Schlieren - Shock Surface completely indigenous software!
IN-SPACe has selected six Indian companies for up to ₹1 crore each to develop AI technologies for space. * Agnikul: Precision landing * Digantara: Space object analysis * EON Space Labs: Debris detection * OrbitAID: On-orbit servicing * Omnipresent Robot Tech: Target recognition * TakeMe2Space: Spacecraft autonomy IN-SPACe began its Seed Fund Scheme in 2023 with agriculture-focused space applications. It has since funded work in disaster management, urban development, and other sectors.
1
16
1,108
PSA: If you use agents heavily, I'd recommend being very cautious next few days as things get patched because even if you updated your browser or system, the agents may not have yet!
6
2
92
3,235
"Not to punish evil is equivalent to authorizing it." — Leonardo da Vinci
86
3,636
152
16,073
128,593
I built Universal Prompt Enhancer: a tiny qwen based 0.8B model that turns rough ideas into prompts for image, video, sound & music generators. Runs locally. Accepts images for edits. Q6_K: ~630 MB. Weights + 44K examples, released for research. Try your messiest prompt 👇
5
8
2
55
10,128
6
1
133
2,090
Dusting off this tweet from April because this gap in shared understanding of LLM capability is *widening*. It's now less "two groups of people speaking past each other" and more a sharp funnel. - Napkin math somewhere around 6B people (~75% of the population) have barely come in contact with LLMs at all. - Around 1-2B (~20%) are casual and infrequent users of free-tier ChatGPT-like products. This group sees derpy chatbots and treats them a bit like a better Google search, a writing aid, or etc. Maybe an agent tries to book you a flight. I have non-tech friends who (reasonably, imo) say they have not much use for it at all. Even many professionals outside of math&code are in this tier. For example, execs and many other functions spend a lot of their time talking to other people, so while they understand what is happening intellectually, it is still second-hand and a bit abstract. - Now we get to professional use of frontier-grade LLMs in math&code. Somewhere around 20M people (0.2%) see first-hand that large, complex projects that used to take them weeks/months can now be completed by agents with a prompt. Building apps, copying apps, translating apps, decompiling apps from binaries... This has all happened very quickly and recently - less than 1 year ago, I was writing code manually by hand, typing memorized computer code commands into a code editor character by character, occasionally pressing Tab to autocomplete a little chunk of code. - And finally we get to the ~5,000 people (~0.00006%) with access to frontier-grade systems internally. The external world has seen the preview. It looks like swarms of thousands of agents collaborating over weeks on software mega projects: minting zero days, running cyber attacks and defenses at machine speeds, discovering new science, advancing the frontier of mathematics. Things that would have taken top professionals in the industry years of work. Meanwhile, human review and comprehension are starting to fall behind. For example, people are still involved in the "archeology" of the OpenAI-HF incident from many months ago. Mathematicians may be poring over the 722 manuscripts on frontier mathematics for a while. The funnel is driven by a combination of factors: 1. The impact scales with ambition, problem size, and horizon. A question with a paragraph answer barely stresses the system. You need a reservoir of big, difficult problems that you really care about. This aspect drives the consumer / professional dimension of the funnel. 2. The jaggedness of the system (which I have written about a lot separately). Capability peaks in domains that are digital, verifiable and economically valuable. This is because LLM capability emerges from reinforcement learning on verifiable rewards on a curated environment mixture driven by revenue potential. This aspect primarily drives the area (e.g. math&code) dimension of the funnel. 3. Access. Free-tier, paid-tier, internal. So this is the weirdness of the moment. The general public has mostly not interacted with these systems. When they have, it looks like a derpy chatbot. The majority of professionals still see only a modest uplift. And a small sliver of professionals are experiencing the vertigo of the curve going vertical. And it is all happening at the same time.
Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along. So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions. TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.
2,228
5,886
2,268
43,921
6,851,322
Replying to @radhika_sadhvip
Actually anyone who has run a home knows that it is the unnecessary filth that attracts the cockroaches.
19
63
3
633
12,099
360
2,833
87
19,484
241,687
If you have completed this 👇 course (MIT 18.337J / 6.338J), and enjoyed it, I have a job for you. It's pretty cool. ✉️ me.
4
35
2
364
21,302
We’re hiring an Engineer - Scientific Computing (C++/Rust) at @pre6ai in Bengaluru. If you can pick up a CFD/simulation paper, understand the math, and implement it for a new problem from first principles - without vibe coding - we want to talk. You’ll build numerical compute systems, production solvers, and eventually push them hard on GPUs. Deep ownership. Small team. 100th percentile salary. apply - [email protected]
40
51
5
790
53,443
I am planning to offer AI credit free for power users of @proofzme . Proof is used by 2200+ professionals including college students. Please tag anyone who can help me here.
2
2
9
344
Gradient descent can write code better than you. I'm sorry.
327
1,245
409
11,199
Frameo is hiring for a creative technologist role, sits at the intersection of creative content x technical sophistication; it is a cool problem to solve with fun people - highly recommended tag someone who fits / RT for good karma link to application form in first comment
4
9
1
15
2,746
Asimov’s Foundation series was a major influence on me. That and the fall of Rome, from which Foundation takes inspiration, is what convinced me that we need to extend consciousness beyond Earth to avoid a potentially infinite dark age.
2,952
3,914
506
42,823
7,625,451
Sneak peak - run CFD fill simulation in your browser!
3
1
1
46
4,408
Hiring really sharp product manager. The job will more of market research along with the founding team/product owners at Pre6. The person should be very hands-on, able to build solutions as well. Note - This is not a fresher role. Location - HSR Bengaluru. please send me an email - [email protected] with relevant information/experience.
2
3
1
26
4,129
Replying to @iam_smx
*trillioniare
12,503
18,142
4,976
215,271
17,700,096
aman retweeted
Do we have any serious deep tech investors here? The kind who would be interested in a hardware product in the motors space with serious IP and something only the founders of that company can build; no one else? Backed by Z21 and a few others in previous rounds.
21
12
68
10,370