Interested in politics, history , nature , garden bird watching and wine , only white wine ..

Cork
Joined February 2011
Niamh Leahy retweeted
This DOES NOT include hospitals, universities, state bodies etc that mess up the charity regulator dataset. These are genuine "Non Profits".
7
52
1,271
Niamh Leahy retweeted
The top 152 nonprofits ( NGOs?) received €3.69 BILLION in public funding in Ireland in 2024. I've spent months analysing the financial returns of thousands of organisations registered with the Charities Regulator, trying to establish how much public money flows into Ireland's nonprofit sector, where it goes, and how concentrated that funding actually is. Within my research population of 2,634 organisations, primarily across health, social services, housing and local development, I identified approximately €4.98 billion in reported public funding for 2024. But here's the striking part. Just 152 organisations received €3.69 billion of that money. That's 5.8% of the organisations accounting for 74% of the public funding within my research population. The remaining 2,482 organisations shared approximately €1.29 billion. Those 152 organisations break down as follows: 62 in Social Services 60 in Housing & Local Development 30 in Health And the concentration goes further. Of the 2,634 organisations, just 1,671 received €100,000 or more in public funding. Those organisations accounted for approximately 99.4% of the total. This is where our public discussion about "charities" and "NGOs" becomes completely confused. We routinely talk about Ireland's thousands of registered charities as though they're one homogeneous sector. They're not. The register contains everything from tiny volunteer-run community organisations to enormous, professionally managed service providers receiving tens or hundreds of millions of euro annually. Some provide essential disability, housing, healthcare and social services on behalf of the State. Others are community groups, representative organisations or advocacy bodies. These are fundamentally different types of organisations, operating at completely different scales, but they're all thrown into the same administrative category of "charity". An important caveat about my figures. This is NOT a comprehensive analysis of every nonprofit, community organisation or publicly funded group in Ireland. There are thousands of organisations outside my research population, including small community groups, sports clubs, voluntary associations, organisations that aren't registered charities, and entire sectors I've deliberately excluded. The actual number of organisations operating across Ireland's wider nonprofit, voluntary and community sector is considerably larger. My research deliberately focuses on a few core areas, particularly organisations involved in delivering publicly funded services. Another important point: this is 2024 data. We're approaching the end of 2026, so these figures are already almost two years old. If public funding has increased by 5% or 10% since then, the €4.98 billion identified in my research population could now be approximately €5.23 billion to €5.48 billion. That's an illustration, not a verified 2026 figure. And remember, that still wouldn't represent total public funding across Ireland's entire nonprofit and community sector. I've also encountered serious problems with the underlying Charities Regulator data, including missing financial reports and obvious reporting errors. 152 organisations. €3.69 billion. 74% of the public funding within my research population. And I've had to spend months assembling, cleaning and classifying government data just to establish these basic facts.
13
84
8
247
13,920
Niamh Leahy retweeted
🇲🇦MOROCCAN IPAS RESIDENT WHO ASSAULTED TWO GARDAI CAN RETURN TO GALWAY TO LIVE And you can't make it up, his name is JIHAD! Judge Fiona Lydon granted an application from Jihad Rakibi (32) to vary the terms of his bail to allow him reside in Galway so long as he isn't a naughty boy again. It is alleged that on September 28, 2026 at Garda north Western regional headquarters, Murrough, he assaulted Garda Cian O'Boyle and Garda Aaron Kinsella. connachttribune.ie/news/crim…
12
77
3
215
3,646
A man accused of assaulting 2 gardaí can return to live in Galway but has been warned by a judge not to come to negative attention Judge Fiona Lydon granted an application from Jihad Rakibi (32) to vary the terms of his bail to allow him reside in Galway.connachttribune.ie/news/crim…
119
93
18
283
13,970
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Deputy Nolan described the Government’s further postponement of a scheme for employed IPAS residentsto contribute to costs as an “absolute insult” to 150,000+ Irish households who contribute toward their own social housing costs. She first raised the issue in 2024. gript.ie/nolan-slams-further…
25
145
10
612
14,870
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Well worth listening to. A proper diplomatic analysis by a professional diplomat. We've got McEntee.
That particular moment when George Yeo, Singapore’s former foreign minister, demonstrated a remarkably deep understanding of European history and the complex conflicts that have shaped the continent,an understanding that seems to elude many Western politicians. It is genuinely rare to hear a senior statesman speak with such historical depth, intellectual clarity, and geopolitical insight.....
2
3
10
199
This week, a court in Ireland adjourned the sentencing of a Brazilian criminal so he could complete his Irish citizenship process. I am not joking.
118
735
32
2,508
22,552
China consumed more coal in the last four years (2022–2025) than the entire world consumed throughout the 19th century.
81
1,009
163
5,415
174,757
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
🤖 Made with AI
272
2,611
374
5,637
129,042
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Remember these names
4
23
1
170
4,801
Niamh Leahy retweeted
The government funded the advert that made a granny's hug appear suspect and threatening. They then say they are not responsible for it.
16
34
292
4,543
6. Work Permits We can see that the Govt is on track to issue more work permits to Indians in 2026 than 2025.
5
23
191
13,607
The most unlikable Taoiseach in modern times.
35
133
8
478
4,418
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Your government granted this organisation ~€740000 in 2025. Is there no actual oversight into how these taxpayer funds are spent?
The video produced by the DRCC involving grandparents does not represent the views of the Government. It was both inappropriate and demeaning to grandparents and has been removed by DRCC following my officials engagement with them.
6
11
149
Niamh Leahy retweeted
BREAKING - Sinn Fein has issued a statement confirming that Aengus O’Snodaigh TD is a chair and board member of a charity organisation that is currently under investigation by Gardai. Deputy O’Snodaigh has not been contacted by Gardai at this stage. More @IrishSunOnline
29
52
7
167
41,093
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Named! The charity which was raided by Gardai and the Charity Regulator on Tue/Wed, with Rolex watches, Louis Vuitton luxury leather goods and two BMW X5 valued at €250,000 It's Liberties Recycling Training and Development CLG, also known as Liberty Recycling, a registered charity which receives around €400,000 a year from the taxpayer. It collects unwanted goods, mostly clothing, sells them in its shops and to wholesalers overseas, and uses the proceeds to help people with difficult backgrounds, particularly in addiction to get skills and work experience and build their lives. Most of its €3.6m income comes from its sales. One of its principals is SF TD Aengus O'Snodaigh, who states he is chairperson and secretary, and is also a director of a related private company (without charity status, despite his claim in the Oireachtas register) Liberty (sic) Global Exports Company Limited by Guarantee. Note, there is no allegation of wrongdoing at this time against Aengus O'Snodaigh. Other principals include Philip Moloney, Tony Geoghegan of Merchants Quay fame and Gabriel Kinahan.
32
182
22
649
99,925
Ireland is now a country where grandparents naturally expressing their affection for their grandchildren is dubious, but men chestfeeding babies for sexual gratification is perfectly fine.
The latest ad from the Irish Government to the Irish people, who are the font of all problems in the country and desperately need to be stopped from their bad behaviour. This time, it's hugging your grandkids.
19
166
5
912
11,445
*Important, Let me explain the public money trail behind the viral advert about grandparents hugging their grandchildren. Four Organisations keep appearing: 1. CUAN, 2. Community Foundation Ireland, 3. Dublin Rape Crisis Centre, and 4. We-Consent. 1. Cuan is the State agency. Established in January 2024 to fund and coordinate domestic and sexual violence services, set standards, and run awareness campaigns. It sits inside the Dept. of Justice Its funding has risen from €58.6 million in 2024 to €84.4 million allocation for 2027 (+44% increase in three years!) At end of 2024 it had 28 employees. That year it spent roughly €3 million on staff, administration and board costs + another €4.2 million on awareness campaigns. In 2025 it allocated €58.36 million to 78 organisations (see pic below). 2. Community Foundation Ireland Denise Charlton is CEO of Community Foundation. She also sits on CUAN's statutory board, and is a named member of We-Consent’s advisory group. Community Foundation Ireland helped fund the original We-Consent campaign (launched 2023 by DRCC, with Dept of Justice support). Other CUAN board members also lead or sit on organisations that receive Cuan grants (including Women’s Aid and Galway Rape Crisis Centre and others). These links are publicly disclosed. They are not evidence of wrongdoing. Everything here is above board. But they do raise ordinary public-interest questions about conflict declarations, recusals, and how core grants are renewed versus the smaller open funding call (€3.2m in 2025). 3. We-Consent We-Consent is a DRCC project, not a separate State body. The precise cost, production details, and evaluation of this particular grandparents advert are not publicly broken out. 4. ***IMPORTANT** Dublin Rape Crisis Centre does important work. Supporting survivors and teaching boundaries are not in dispute. But my question here is: What measurable improvement has this new agency structure, CUAN, delivered per euro spent, and where is the independent comparison with the previous system? *The graphic below shows how €58.3million was distributed in 2025. CUAN's total budget allocation for 2027 is €85million.
The latest ad from the Irish Government to the Irish people, who are the font of all problems in the country and desperately need to be stopped from their bad behaviour. This time, it's hugging your grandkids.
62
359
34
1,352
55,903
Niamh Leahy retweeted
As France is burning, I keep thinking of what the UAE Foreign Minister said a few years ago 👇 He accurately predicted this.
998
28,920
1,468
96,810
2,546,425
Niamh Leahy retweeted
A year ago, Vice President Vance delivered this warning to Europe about mass migration. The European leaders in the room were stunned and appalled. In light of recent events, his remarks are worth revisiting. He warned them. They refused to listen.
80
2,826
103
9,785
181,548