Interested in politics, history , nature , garden bird watching and wine , only white wine ..

Cork
Joined February 2011
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Niamh Leahy retweeted
This DOES NOT include hospitals, universities, state bodies etc that mess up the charity regulator dataset. These are genuine "Non Profits".
7
49
1,199
Niamh Leahy retweeted
The top 152 nonprofits ( NGOs?) received €3.69 BILLION in public funding in Ireland in 2024. I've spent months analysing the financial returns of thousands of organisations registered with the Charities Regulator, trying to establish how much public money flows into Ireland's nonprofit sector, where it goes, and how concentrated that funding actually is. Within my research population of 2,634 organisations, primarily across health, social services, housing and local development, I identified approximately €4.98 billion in reported public funding for 2024. But here's the striking part. Just 152 organisations received €3.69 billion of that money. That's 5.8% of the organisations accounting for 74% of the public funding within my research population. The remaining 2,482 organisations shared approximately €1.29 billion. Those 152 organisations break down as follows: 62 in Social Services 60 in Housing & Local Development 30 in Health And the concentration goes further. Of the 2,634 organisations, just 1,671 received €100,000 or more in public funding. Those organisations accounted for approximately 99.4% of the total. This is where our public discussion about "charities" and "NGOs" becomes completely confused. We routinely talk about Ireland's thousands of registered charities as though they're one homogeneous sector. They're not. The register contains everything from tiny volunteer-run community organisations to enormous, professionally managed service providers receiving tens or hundreds of millions of euro annually. Some provide essential disability, housing, healthcare and social services on behalf of the State. Others are community groups, representative organisations or advocacy bodies. These are fundamentally different types of organisations, operating at completely different scales, but they're all thrown into the same administrative category of "charity". An important caveat about my figures. This is NOT a comprehensive analysis of every nonprofit, community organisation or publicly funded group in Ireland. There are thousands of organisations outside my research population, including small community groups, sports clubs, voluntary associations, organisations that aren't registered charities, and entire sectors I've deliberately excluded. The actual number of organisations operating across Ireland's wider nonprofit, voluntary and community sector is considerably larger. My research deliberately focuses on a few core areas, particularly organisations involved in delivering publicly funded services. Another important point: this is 2024 data. We're approaching the end of 2026, so these figures are already almost two years old. If public funding has increased by 5% or 10% since then, the €4.98 billion identified in my research population could now be approximately €5.23 billion to €5.48 billion. That's an illustration, not a verified 2026 figure. And remember, that still wouldn't represent total public funding across Ireland's entire nonprofit and community sector. I've also encountered serious problems with the underlying Charities Regulator data, including missing financial reports and obvious reporting errors. 152 organisations. €3.69 billion. 74% of the public funding within my research population. And I've had to spend months assembling, cleaning and classifying government data just to establish these basic facts.
13
82
8
237
12,973
Replying to @TonightVMTV
The media here focuses so little on our own politicians, that I've never heard nor seen this lady .. I can recognised more American & UK politicians than our own lot.
36
Niamh Leahy retweeted
🇲🇦MOROCCAN IPAS RESIDENT WHO ASSAULTED TWO GARDAI CAN RETURN TO GALWAY TO LIVE And you can't make it up, his name is JIHAD! Judge Fiona Lydon granted an application from Jihad Rakibi (32) to vary the terms of his bail to allow him reside in Galway so long as he isn't a naughty boy again. It is alleged that on September 28, 2026 at Garda north Western regional headquarters, Murrough, he assaulted Garda Cian O'Boyle and Garda Aaron Kinsella. connachttribune.ie/news/crim…
11
75
3
212
3,601
A man accused of assaulting 2 gardaí can return to live in Galway but has been warned by a judge not to come to negative attention Judge Fiona Lydon granted an application from Jihad Rakibi (32) to vary the terms of his bail to allow him reside in Galway.connachttribune.ie/news/crim…
119
93
18
283
13,893
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Deputy Nolan described the Government’s further postponement of a scheme for employed IPAS residentsto contribute to costs as an “absolute insult” to 150,000+ Irish households who contribute toward their own social housing costs. She first raised the issue in 2024. gript.ie/nolan-slams-further…
25
145
10
612
14,850
Replying to @BRICSinfo
If he can't fund the war on his side... why are the European citizens doing so..
1
79
Replying to @HMcEntee
Taxpayers money .... the EU is going down the toilet and yet all the focus is on Ukraine ..
1
24
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Well worth listening to. A proper diplomatic analysis by a professional diplomat. We've got McEntee.
That particular moment when George Yeo, Singapore’s former foreign minister, demonstrated a remarkably deep understanding of European history and the complex conflicts that have shaped the continent,an understanding that seems to elude many Western politicians. It is genuinely rare to hear a senior statesman speak with such historical depth, intellectual clarity, and geopolitical insight.....
2
3
10
199
Replying to @Tablesalt13
Governments have no money of their own , what they have is taxpayers money , businesses money , & tax money from people that buy so much as a lollipop.. they might hold purse strings but it's the people who fill them. They should never be allowed to say anything is free , its not
1
86
This week, a court in Ireland adjourned the sentencing of a Brazilian criminal so he could complete his Irish citizenship process. I am not joking.
118
735
32
2,506
22,523
And not one of the spineless back benchers will make a move on their messiah Martin …
1
12
124
China consumed more coal in the last four years (2022–2025) than the entire world consumed throughout the 19th century.
81
1,009
163
5,415
174,731
Replying to @cajos1
Seems like a lot for a small defence force .
1
16
Replying to @DavQuinn
The 3 main parties all seem to be happy in & around midteens to 21% . They dont want to be a single party government , because they might have to follow through on election promises. They love "compromise on policy"as a coalition government to sheild them been called liars.
3
141
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
🤖 Made with AI
272
2,611
374
5,636
129,005
Replying to @IsabelO20183051
I'll never understand the wanting to lead the country and then hand over control to a unelected, deeply unpopular eu leader
1
2
24
Replying to @HMcEntee
You are a elected irish politician, not a global politician.. the concern about every other country is ridiculous. Africa has 54 countries , enough of the African union politicians to sort African problems.
1
65
918
Niamh Leahy retweeted
Remember these names
4
23
1
170
4,801