Incredible this doesn't get more attention.
When the guardian started the stories about Chagos, it was all about the human rights of the evicted islanders, fair enough .
Once it was on the agenda they were never referenced by them again.
Why were Jonathan Powell, Peter Mandelson and Lord Hermer appointed without vetting?
The answer is that Chagos was a deal Starmer couldn't refuse to make.
Here's a timeline of the key stages of the Chagos treachery.
In 1982, after it became known that the Chagos seabed may contain vast mineral wealth, Mauritius set up a select committee to examine the matter.
However, sea-mining technology was in its infancy, and it was too expensive to be commercially viable at that time.
In 2003, as underwater mining technologies advanced and the value of minerals and rare earth elements soared, mining the Chagos seabed became an exciting possibility again; Mauritius appointed the eminent international barrister Sir Ian Brownlie as advisor for the Chagos Archipelago.
A former member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, Brownlie was a good friend of Sir Satcam Boolell, a former Labour deputy prime minister of Mauritius, and High Commissioner in London.
In 2009, Brownlie led the first Mauritius delegation to the Foreign Office in London seeking a Chagos deal.
Among the delegation was Sir Satcam Boolell's son Satyajit, who became Mauritius Director of Public Prosecutions the same year.
In 2010, after Brownlie died in a motor accident in Egypt, Sir Keir Starmer’s “great mate”, Philippe Sands, a leading human-rights lawyer who has publicly boasted of humiliating the UK in international courts, took over as counsel to Mauritius for Chagos.
In 2013, Satyajit Boolell invited Keir Starmer, whom he had become friendly with during Starmer's time as the UK's DPP, to a legal conference at the 5-star Balaclava resort in Mauritius.
During the trip, Starmer discussed the future of the Chagos Archipelago with then Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam.
After Starmer’s 2013 visit, Ramgoolam wrote that he and Starmer were aligned over Chagos.
In 2015, Ramgoolam was arrested on money-laundering charges when large sums of cash in foreign currencies, suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches, and blank British visas were found in his home.
Also in 2015, Starmer was elected to the British Parliament.
In 2019, Philippe Sands, after a campaign of lobbying the UN, obtained an International Court of Justice ruling (advisory opinion only, and non-binding) that the Chagos islands should be given to Mauritius.
Sands used the ICJ ruling as leverage in the following years in his efforts to persuade the Conservative government to give Chagos to Mauritius.
In 2020, Starmer became leader of the Labour Party.
In 2021, Sands received Mauritius' top honour, The Most Distinguished Order of the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean.
In 2022, Sands made an unauthorized entry into the Chagos Archipelago for a flag-raising ceremony. Sands tweets at the time, “It’s morning on Chagos, where the flag of Mauritius flies."
In 2023, Sands became a Mauritius citizen, but retains his British and French citizenships.
🧧In November 2023, David Cameron replaced James Cleverly as Foreign Secretary and, with the support of other senior Tories, stopped a Chagos deal saying, it’s not in the national interest, as reported in Hansard.
In July 2024, Starmer became UK Prime Minister and just ten weeks after entering Downing Street, he agreed a deal with Mauritius, despite there having been no mention of Chagos during the election campaign, and the Labour manifesto pledging to protect the BOT.
in November of 2024, Ramgoolam was elected Mauritius prime minister again after a snap general election, and took over from the incumbent PM, Pravind Jugnauth, to lead the Chagos negotiations with the UK.
In December 2024, after 14 years in the role, Philippe Sands steps down as Mauritius counsel for Chagos.
In January 2025, Attorney General Lord Hermer recused himself from signing off on the Chagos deal, and declined to say why.
In February 2025, Jugnauth was arrested on money-laundering charges after large sums of cash in foreign currencies and suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches were found in his home.
In May 2025, twelve years after discussing the future of Chagos in Mauritius, Starmer and Ramgoolam sat down in London to sign the treaty that transfers the archipelago's sovereignty to Mauritius.
The Fall Out.
The Chagos deal does🟥NOT secure the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia.
The deal operationally hobbles the base, and increases the dangers to the British and American military personnel, and the civilians who work there, and in the wider Central Indian Ocean region.
Diego Garcia's remoteness made it easy to defend in the past. This deal leaves the base horribly vulnerable to the growing threats posed by the new longer-range missiles, and more sophisticated and lethal drones.
When Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and Vijay Rangarajan, the Director General at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, made the deal it was fully understood that the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago were by far the best locations to deploy early warning, and air-defense systems, to protect the main base from missile and drone attacks.
Yet they still decided to lease only Diego Garcia.
Andy Burnham, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, and Defense Minister Wes Streeting, know the deal increases the dangers to the lives of British service personnel, and our NATO allies personnel, in the strategically important Central Indian Ocean region.
To double down and push the deal with that knowledge is a shameful act of betrayal.
While the deal leaves Diego Garcia vulnerable to attack, it also renders the base itself ineffective and operationally hobbled.
Mauritius is a signatory of the Pelindaba African Weapon-Free Zone Treaty which bans all nuclear weapons from treaty members' territory.
Pelindaba gives each of the more the 40 countries who have signed it the right to inspect the facilities on Diego Garcia if they suspect nuclear arms are being stored there.
The UK's nuclear-armed Trident submarines will no longer be able to enter Chagos waters, or visit Diego Garcia which is the only island in the region which has suitable anchorage and facilities for maintenance and restocking provisions, etc.
The US's nuclear-armed submarines, ships, and planes will also be banned from Diego Garcia and the Chagos Archipelago's waters.
Mauritius gets complete sovereignty over everything, including control of the airspace above the Chagos Archipelago, which at 250,000 square miles is the same size as France.
The implications of controlling such a vast area of airspace in a strategically vital region are huge.
Mauritius has shown it will ban planes entering its current airspace when China asks.
The Chagos Deal does not ‘secure the base’. It methodically destroys every element required for operations. The text and annexes state it will:
❌Constrain future Ops and use of the base
❌Prevent the placing of sensors and other maritime installations
❌Require us to sight our foes on defence planning
❌Mean we’re unable to use our preferred contractors
❌See us lose of control over electromagnetic spectrum.
dan hare retweeted
The UK government has, since April, spent no less than £61 billion - that’s £61,000,000,000 - on debt interest payments.
That’s equivalent to our entire annual defence budget - on just half a year’s worth of debt service costs, not paying back a penny of our national debt.
For £61bn you could build 40 state-of-the-art hospitals.
Or employ 100,000 nurses for a decade
Or fund free-at-the-point-of-use social care, across the entire UK, for three years.
Watch this short “When The Facts Change” video for more on the UK’s soaring debt interest bill - the biggest national scandal our mainstream media continues to ignore.
dan hare retweeted
Brutal chart.
France and UK vs. Communist countries at their peak.
UK public spending as % of GDP is currently above Romania, Venezuela and China.
And France is a lost cause.
(HM Treasury/Rand Research)
dan hare retweeted
How can it have taken this long for them to grasp this. If you really want non intermittent non fossil fuel energy, this is the only answer.
dan hare retweeted
Laffer curve latest: big increases in the tax burden have reduced tax revenues as companies have been pushed into bankruptcy.
Business insolvencies rose 39% between 2019-20 and 2025-26 as higher taxes and soaring costs caused firms to collapse. HMRC lost £13bn as a consequence.
Nimesh Shah of accountants Blick Rothenberg said: “The UK tax burden is at its highest levels in modern peace time and changes to tax, labour laws and the minimum wage increase have added significant burden to businesses".
“The irony is that the Government increasing the tax burden has had the effect of increasing HMRC’s tax losses.”
youtu.be/E6bKlWZMqfk?is=ltau…
@Dominic2306 frustrates in his "the system is working as designed" gnomic posts, and the sheer stupidity of Barnard Castle, but this tour de force will have British people who care sadly nodding along at the enshittification of our institutions.
dan hare retweeted
Replying to @itvpeston @JohnHealey_MP
Norway’s fund was started in 1996. Labour could have done it in 1997 but was too busy spending. We didn’t set up such a fund in the ‘80s was because we had such high levels of debt caused by the errors of socialist postwar policies
dan hare retweeted
Replying to @DanielPriestley
Except that’s just the BoE’s measure of inflation. They’re actually lifting closer to 7% out of your savings …
dan hare retweeted
It must have been a different John Swinney who said in February 2025 that blocking Jackdaw was “the only sustainable judgment you can arrive at in considering these questions".
dan hare retweeted
Reminder: whatever he might claim today, this is what John Swinney said in February 2025. He welcomed the court’s decision to block Jackdaw, calling it “the only sustainable judgment you can arrive at in considering these questions”.
dan hare retweeted
You notice anything?
Look at what separates the two groups.
It isn't technology.
It isn't complexity.
It's one variable: how much the state is involved.
At the top, sectors that are subsidized, regulated, shielded from competition, where the state funds demand and blocks supply.
At the bottom, sectors where companies fight every single morning to serve you better and cheaper.
Still can't quite believe it, but the team are thrilled and proud to have been recognised by our peers in our industry.
Thanks to all our clients and team mates past and present, and can't wait to see what we will achieve together with our new Claude Partnership !
<<A job advert for the 2027 secondment, which closed on Friday, said successful candidates would have “the ability to influence decision making, working with credibility and proactively with customers to share knowledge and information”.>>
The front page of today’s Sunday Telegraph:
‘Civil Service fact-checkers embedded at the BBC’
#TomorrowsPapersToday
dan hare retweeted
It's Alastair Campbell I feel sorry for.
Imagine being associated with a spectacular claim that makes headlines around the world, only for it to later emerge that it's overhyped balderdash.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6jd…
The serious answer to how Shazam worked is it took the peaks of a spectrogram of short clips of every song, find the peaks from the highest amplitude bits, hash it with the value being (time stamp, track id) and then the actual recognition is a hashtable lookup.
We did this for a college CS project. The original paper is fantastic:
dan hare retweeted
In 2008 the European Union and the USA had similar sized economies.
In 2026, the USA is $30.5 trillion and the EU is only $20 trillion.
Lousy policy has consequences.
dan hare retweeted
Solidarity with Resignation of Jewish Green Party member and Councillor.
Incredibly sad to see you resign @andree_frieze. I really wish you hadn't given way to others when you wanted to speak. I wish they had given way to you. I've only read Caroline's speech but yours would have been much more powerful and one thing is for sure, the authoritarians weren't going to be told what to think no matter how senior the person telling them.
But your story is much more powerful. I'm going to reproduce below too: andreefrieze.substack.com/p/…
Words of Andree Frieze:
"The Green Party is now antisemitic
and supports terrorism
Yesterday, Green Party conference passed the Zionism is Racism motion proposed by Greens4Palestine. A relatively new, extremely well-organised non-affiliated group within the Green Party. If you’re wondering how they managed such a meteoric rise to victory, you’re not alone, and although I’m not a conspiracy theorist, this initial probing could do with further digging.
I had planned to speak against the motion, but after consulting colleagues it seemed wisest that I didn’t as the abuse I might receive could outweigh any possible benefit. Plus, there were bigger name speakers lined up to speak out, who should take precedence. So I gave way to Caroline Lucas, Femi Oluwole and Ellie Chowns.
If I had spoken, this is the speech I would have given.
“My parents-in-law, now in their 80s, were eight or nine when racism expelled them from the only country they had called home.
They left in the clothes they were standing in, with only a suitcase. Homes, jobs, communities, left behind. Destroyed in a moment.
For the next eight years they lived in refugee camps, until homes were built to move into them.
They were just two small children, but part of the 150,000-strong Jewish community in Iraq that existed until the 1950s, from the sixth century BCE.
Some 850,000 Jews who were ethnically cleansed from the Middle East after Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Iraq declared war on the new country of Israel in 1948.
Banished because of racism, because the Arab nations didn’t want an independent Jewish nation on their borders.
Israel was created in the wake of the killing of more than 6 million Jews in the Holocaust.
And, what about the 750,000 Palestinians that fled, told to leave by the invading armies, or evicted as the Jews fought back?
Were they given homes in the Middle Eastern countries which had just got rid of the hundreds of thousands of Jews in their cities and towns?
No. Why not?
Racism.
Those nations didn’t want Palestinians in their lands either.
Their hatred of Jews kept Palestinians as endless refugees.
Conference you are being asked to say that Zionism is Racism.
This is a distortion of history and Arab and Western racism against the Jews.
If you vote for this motion [unamended], you are saying that the whole of the Jewish people – the 15.8 million people, still short of the 16.6 million before the Holocaust – are racist and responsible for the desperate situation the Palestinians are in.
If you believe this is simply due to Zionism, then vote for this motion.
But if you think that the Western and the Arab nations might just have had a hand in causing the Palestinians’ plight then you have to vote against this motion.”
I have been saying for the last 10 months, since the Zionism is Racism motion was first put out, that I would resign if it passed. I will, but it’s proving harder than I thought.
Stepping into the Green Party in 2012 felt like coming home.
Stepping away from 14 years of membership, 12 years of campaigning, 8 years of being a councillor and countless friendships is, unsurprisingly, proving hard.
Nonetheless, I cannot stay in a party that demands the destruction of Israel, denies Jewish self-definition, and deems me racist."

































