Joined February 2026
What’s the best way to run DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on 4 DGX Sparks? As I see it, there isn’t one answer. It depends on what you need. One fast user/agent, or many at once? Huge documents? Long agentic sessions? Original weights, or compressed? We needed these answers to figure out the optimal stacks for our CVE pipelines. So we took six community recipes, ran each exactly as its author serves it on the same four Sparks, and measured them all the same way, to see what each one is best at. Quality first: on our tests it’s level. All six pass 71 of 75 qeval tasks and find every passphrase hidden in a 1M-token prompt, compressed weights included. So the choice comes down to how you use it: @bertholomusai (TensorFold, 4-bit EXL3): the fastest single user (77 tok/s), the quickest reply while someone else’s long prompt is being read (0.9 s), and 16 full 1M-token sessions at once. @Tech2Wild (TensorFold, 3.5-bit EXL3): the fastest coding for one user (134 tok/s), and the most memory left free on each node. J-M-Recipes, @JamesMeadlock (vLLM on @christopherowen’s fork, original weights): the most users at once (32 seats, 288 tok/s with 16 users), quick replies during long reads (1.1 s), and 11.5 full 1M sessions. In our long-session agent tests it started the next turn fastest. @majewskizby (SGLang, original weights): the fastest at reading huge documents, 1M tokens in 3.4 minutes. @MiaAI_lab (TensorFold, original weights): 16 full 1M sessions at once on the original weights. @MiaAI_lab (SGLang, original weights): the production line @majewskizby’s profile builds on. Medians of three runs, temperature 0, thinking off, on an NVIDIA SN3700 switch. All credit to the authors: these are their recipes, we only ran and measured them. Kudos for publishing them openly, with every setting, patch and number needed to reproduce them, and for the speed you ship at. Fun note: several of these releases are days old. You also share fixes with each other: tonyd2wild’s RDMA patch is what got bertholomus’s engine running on our network, and @majewskizby’s MTU fix landed in Mia’s recipe this morning. You’ve made a model this size practical to run on four desktop boxes, and our CVE work now runs on it - thank you!
3
4
333
Replying to @MiaAI_lab
This is my current (and constantly shifting) setup, @MiaAI_lab.
47
Replying to @DanielMiessler
These are my go to images when thinking about that question...most interesting is the breakdown:
19
Replying to @JHNY__5 @MiaAI_lab
Mean of 8 task types (code, json, prose, math...). 1 stream: code 96 vs 122, prose 52 vs 71, math 83 vs 112 tok/s, Flare vs Mia SGLang. Temp 1, thinking off.
2
407
Replying to @MiaAI_lab
These are my preliminary results with Flare, @MiaAI_lab :
6
13
2,743
August 2026: 12,275 CVEs published in one month. That's almost double the 12-month average of 6,256, and the average is climbing too. If your triage process was sized for 2023 volumes, it's already underwater. The fastest-growing bug class since 2023 is missing authorization: code that works fine but never checks who is asking. 613 of those CVEs in August alone. That's also when AI coding tools went mainstream. Coincidence is doing a lot of work here. exploit-intel.com/stats
57
Replying to @YafahEdelman
I think we're already there. Stats taken from exploit-intel.com/stats
56
One of the funniest OpenClaw onboarding processes I ever had.
1
106