Adrian ☧ (@fideluser) header
Adrian ☧ (@fideluser) profile picture

Particular Baptist | PC/NCT | 5 Solas | Amil | Supra | 5 Point | Presup | Cessationist | Biblicist | Complementarian | 1LBC 1644 | Nouthetic | Young Earth

Transylvania
Joined May 2010
Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)Photo by Adrian ☧ (@fideluser)
🧵 New Covenant Confession of Faith (ncbf.net) Article I - Scripture 1. The Canon of Scripture By Scripture, we mean the thirty-nine books of the Old Testament and the twenty-seven books of the New Testament, excluding the Apocryphal writings, which are not divinely inspired. While the Apocryphal writings may be of some interest, they have no more authority over us than any other human writing. The Canon of Scripture is now complete and therefore no new claims of canonical revelation will be accepted. Hebrews 1:1-2 2. Inspiration The Bible has both human and divine authorship. Though written over many centuries by men of differing perspectives, experiences, styles, temperaments, and languages, it is entirely free of contradictions. This unity is explained by the fact that the Holy Spirit of God is the true author of Holy Scripture. He inspired, or more precisely breathed out his message. He moved men to write what they wrote, incorporating their human personalities and literary styles into the text. 2 Timothy 3:16-17, 2 Peter 1:20-21, Luke 1:1-4, John 14:26, John 16:13-15, 2 Peter 3:15-16 3. Inerrancy and Authority Scripture (the Bible) is the Word of God. The Bible is the only inspired, infallible, and inerrant writing that exists. By infallible, we mean that the Bible is incapable of error. By inerrant, we mean that the words themselves are without error. The Bible is without error even when it touches on subjects of history and science. It provides the absolute answers for all men, concerning how we are to be saved, what we are to believe, and how we are to live in order to please our Creator. 2 Timothy 3:16-17, John 10:34-35 4. The Clarity of Scripture While all Scripture does not contain the same degree of clarity either by design or due to our limited understanding, we affirm that the Bible is sufficiently clear in revealing what one needs to know in order to come to a saving faith in Jesus Christ. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 5. The Original Languages The Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew and Aramaic. The New Testament was originally written in Greek. 6. The Autographs All that has been said about the divine nature of the Bible applies strictly speaking to the original writings (the Autographs) and not to the translations. We believe that for all practical purposes we have the actual Word of God. Those parts of the Bible that we are not absolutely certain about do not affect the essentials of the Christian faith.
2
1
4
797
“When the antitype arrives in history, or better, when it is inaugurated, not only are the previous types brought to their telos but the entire era introduced entails massive changes.” — Peter J. Gentry & Stephen J. Wellum, God’s Kingdom through God’s Covenants, p. 42
9
“God intervenes through His Spirit in the new eschatological age in order to create what He calls for in the new covenant. The Mosaic covenant lacked this power to produce what it demanded.” — Jason C. Meyer, The End of the Law, Introduction
2
29
Adrian ☧ retweeted
The game plan: 1) Humble ourselves before God 2) Ask God to help us by his grace 3) Invest in the family, church, public square, and missions 4) Do all we can to support good candidates and causes 5) Never lose hope in Christ 6) Remember our home is not here 7) Pray much
27
86
2
707
10,954
“Thus, in union with Christ, the church is God’s new covenant people, in continuity with the elect in all ages but different from Israel in its nature and structure.” — Stephen J. Wellum, Kingdom through Covenant, p. 36
3
40
"Though the Old Testament contained the way to God, his truth, and the expectation of life (John 5:39-40), the New Testament reveals the one who in himself is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6)." — Tom Wells, The Priority of Jesus Christ, p. 69
1
2
34
"God only made promises to faithful Israel—and there is only one wholly faithful Israelite: Jesus of Nazareth." — A. Blake White, What Is New Covenant Theology?
1
24
"He has not merely reissued Moses. Nor has he abrogated Moses. Nor has he merely replaced, intensified, or expanded him. Jesus 'fulfilled' Moses." — Fred Zaspel, New Covenant Theology
1
26
"Given the fact that we live in light of the achievement of Christ's glorious work, we must apply the entire Scripture to us, including all of the previous covenants, through the lens of the achievement of our Lord and the new covenant realities he inaugurates." — Gentry & Wellum, Kingdom through Covenant
1
67
A picture is fine, but the reality is better. The ceremonies that present Christ in shadows and types must change when the real thing has come. — John G. Reisinger, Tablets of Stone
2
42
Posture in prayer isn't magic, but it is purposeful.
1
1
2
149
Adrian ☧ retweeted
I've been told that circumcision was replaced by water baptism according to Paul in Colossians 2. But is that the conclusion we should draw from the context of what Paul said? I don't think so...
3
3
2
6
1,021
🚨 We are live (not the app itself lol), the website for the app. The details & updates about the app should be there. Get your name on the growing list of supporters and partners by donating once or monthly (as the Lord blesses you) 🔗biblestandard.app/
9
17
11
49
14,194
Adrian ☧ retweeted
What Hebrews teaches on the old covenant law (from Jason DeRouchie): “The law made nothing perfect” (7:19); but in Christ, we find: --a “better hope” (7:19) --a “better covenant” (7:22; cf. 8:6)' --“better promises” (8:6) --“better sacrifices” (9:23) --“better possession” (10:34) --a “better country” (11:16) --a “better life” (11:35) --and a “better word” (12:24) None of this entails or enfranchises antinomianism, whether individually, ecclesially, or societally. What it does mean is that we are no in way trying to go back to the old covenant law. We Christians are under the new covenant, and so we obey all the New Testament, and look in an even broader sense to the person, work, teaching, and example of Jesus Christ. He is now our standard of holiness, not the old covenant law; he is the incarnate and embodied fulfillment of all the old covenant law. The law (generally meaning what is sometimes called the "moral law," a term that is nowhere found in Scripture) has value in society as a restraint on sin (1 Timothy 1:8-11). Further, the law continues to teach us about the perfections of God and his moral will for our world. However, Hebrews is clear that we are under the reign and rule of Christ. The old covenant, then, was not bad; it was good. But it is abrogated and fulfilled by the person and work of Christ (2 Cor. 1:20). We seek good law for the public square, to be sure. But we do so knowing that our mission is not to restore old covenant law in the nation; our mission is to make disciples of all nations by the power of the gospel (Rom. 1:16; Matthew 28:16-20). Nowhere does the New Testament lay upon the church the burden to reestablish old covenant law in a given society. We have freedom to work to institute good law in our country, absolutely; that's good to do! But that is not how the kingdom advances. You can enforce the Sabbath in every hamlet, town, and city in America--that is not the same as the advancement of the gospel. Nor is that our mission; nor is that our marching orders from the apostles and New Testament authors. To make it so is to lay a new burden on the backs of God's people, and ultimately to transfer precious resources of time and energy away from what our calling as the church actually is: not to "Christianize" America, but to make disciples by the power of the gospel. You cannot change or adapt the mission of the church without real consequences. You must stay on mission as Christ defined it. Any deviation from this, however noble and well-intended, will have effects, and they will not be positive. (If you doubt this, in historical terms, look at how legalistic enforcement of such strictures fared in the age of both English Puritanism and New England Puritanism. Trying to enforce the standards of old covenant law in society failed, quite frankly, in both contexts. Reinstituting Sabbath observance did not transform either context, not even close. It muddled the mission of the church, and even created fearsome backlash against the church.)
The Sabbath is fulfilled in Christ (Matt. 11:28-30). I respect the views of friends who disagree. But we live by the FINISHED work of Christ. We possess rest *at all times.* We need not enforce Sabbath-keeping, whether at home or in society. Jesus the Fulfiller has come!
25
7
3
86
19,346
Adrian ☧ retweeted
The Sabbath is a good hermeneutical test case. The NT never transfers Sat to Sun. The Lord's Day is not called the Sabbath. The command includes work 6 days. There is no tripartite division of the Law. The focus is rest not worship. For exegesis of the key clear NT texts, see:
12
4
1
49
13,336
Good Friday. A day NOT to preach “Jesus kept the Law perfectly for you so that the righteousness He merited for you might be imputed to you, in accordance with the covenant of works which Adam violated.” A day rather, to preach, “as of first importance” (1 Cor 15:3), the cross.
14
3
7
23
13,223
Adrian ☧ retweeted
My recent 3+ hour conversation on the @ShawnRyanShow about the problem of evil, Bible translation, the Dead Sea Scrolls, angels, demons, nephilim, and I give Shawn a personalized @dawson_knives dagger to boot! youtube.com/watch?v=9trEfdWr…
133
348
25
2,954
325,174
Adrian ☧ retweeted
A few thoughts on family worship: 1. Family worship is a blessing. 2. We have complete freedom on how we do it. 3. There is no biblical command to do family worship 6-7 days per week. 4. We never want to "exasperate" our children, even with good things (Eph. 6).
50
6
22
200
74,074
Adrian ☧ retweeted
This is my latest article (a response to @JoelWebbon): "People who celebrate what God condemns and those who condemn what God celebrates are both abominations to God." Is My “Interracial” Marriage Against God’s Design? [link: slowtowrite.com/is-my-interr…]
231
82
50
961
279,738