@finishedloading

Public Lawyer; @admcourtblog Views expressed are my own.

Joined July 2011
  • Tweets3.1K
  • Following215
  • Followers2.5K
1.2KMedia
Further restricting common law challenges concerning policies: common law “duty of prescription” does not exist administrativecourtblog.word…

Further restricting common law challenges concerning policies: common law “duty of prescription”...

In R (Northumbrian Water Limited) v Water Services Regulation Authority [2024] EWCA Civ 842, the Court of Appeal has held that the common law duty to publish policy on the exercise of discretionary…

administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com
3
1
5
5,758
Gabriel Tan retweeted
Essex CAJI@essex_caji16 Aug 2023
A new @essex_caji blog by @LizAOLoughlin @cassjoce and @finishedloading on Mr Justice Fordham's ten principles of the duty of candour in judicial review, outlined in his judgment in the Police Superintendents' Association case: essexcaji.org/2023/08/16/for…

Fordham’s Ten Principles of the Duty of Candour in Judicial Review

Elizabeth O’Loughlin (University of Durham), Cassandra Somers-Joce (King’s College, London and University of Oxford) and Gabriel Tan (University of Oxford and University of Durham) Intr…

essexcaji.org
2
8
2,891
Gabriel Tan retweeted
Tom Hickman@TomRHickman6 Mar 2023
Tickets still available for PLP’s conference on some of the most important practical issues in public law tomorrow (I’m going to say something about the consequences of breaching duty of candour and the duty on claimants); chaired by the indispensable @finishedloading
Public Law Project@publiclawprojct3 Mar 2023
Tickets still available! 💥 From #FreedomofInformationAct & #subjectaccessrequests, to the #dutyofcandour & opacity in government automation, don't miss the chance to hear from lawyers, academics & campaigners about how you can hold govt to account 🎟️👇 publiclawproject.org.uk/even…
3
5
5,317
The ‘January’ Public Law also has this excellent and original piece from legal twitter’s very own @finishedloading [2023] PL 9
3
1
12
5,672
Replying to @finishedloading
Thanks for explaining. I have given this some more thought. My conclusions are here: rozenberg.substack.com/p/pul…
1
2
6
The High Court has dismissed all three applications relating to Section 377A of the Penal Code. Read case summary here: supremecourt.gov.sg/news/cas…

Page not found

judiciary.gov.sg
3
4
1
Gabriel Tan retweeted
UKCLA@ukcla30 Sep 2019
Mike Gordon: The Prorogation Case and the Political Constitution ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019…
16
5
21
it's out! many thanks to @ProfMarkElliott @DenisBaranger @ChristophMllers @CherylSaunders1 @GeiringerC @DrTomPoole @conorgearty and non-twitterers for their excellent contributions! (author copies should be en route)
7
29
3
85
Gabriel Tan retweeted
Jaclyn Neo@Neo_Jaclyn24 Sep 2019
Sounds very much like - "All power has legal limits and the rule of law demands that the courts should be able to examine the exercise of discretionary power", a quote not from the UKSC but the Singapore Court of Appeal in Chng Suan Tze in 1988. #principleoflegality
Thomas Poole@DrTomPoole24 Sep 2019
Here’s the moment the Supreme Court took the head off prerogative. #prerogativerip
2
7
Parliamentary sovereignty is a gloss not a moving part in Miller/Cherry judgment - dangled early on by the UKSC (41-45), but then totally disappears from the reasoning on legality (55-58), focus there is on accountability function of Parliament
7
1
18
The judgment in 'R (on behalf of Miller) v The Prime Minister' and 'Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland' will be handed down at 10.30am on Tuesday 24 September in Courtroom 1 supremecourt.uk/prorogation/…
122
1,050
247
1,127
NEW POST: "What Could Happen Next If the Government Resigns Rather than Send the Letter to the EU?" on the UKCLA Blog. Retweets and comments gratefully received. ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019…

Robert Craig: What Could Happen Next If the Government Resigns Rather than Send the Letter to the...

This post follows on from a previous piece where I attempted to set out the general rules, and a flowchart, to create a route map in the event of a vote of no confidence. This post seeks to address…

ukconstitutionallaw.org
11
30
3
35
New post by me on Queen's Consent. Retweets gratefully received. blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2019/…

Proponents of the new Bill to stop No Deal face a significant dilemma over Queen’s Consent - LSE...

MPs opposed to a no-deal Brexit have now published their Bill. Robert Craig (LSE) explains why the existence of Queen's Consent means that they face a complex legal Catch-22 in their efforts to stop...

blogs.lse.ac.uk
15
73
30
76
Judgment for The Queen -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs now available online: bit.ly/2YwcfKY
1
3
3
Gabriel Tan retweeted
UKCLA@ukcla24 Jun 2019
Marcelo Rodriguez Ferrere and Andrew Geddis: The New Zealand Court of Appeal on Extradition to the PRC ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019…
3
1
Gabriel Tan retweeted
Paul Daly@pauldalyesq15 May 2019
May I present Privacy International, First of its Name, Breaker of Ouster Clauses, Scourge of Inferior Tribunals of Limited Jurisdiction, Guardian of the Rule of Law and Progenitor of Mountains of Articles in Public Law
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
1
21
4
73
Judgment has been handed down this morning in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) (Appellant) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others (Respondents) – UKSC 2018/0004 supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2…
3
48
13
44
Gabriel Tan retweeted
Tom Hickey@TomHickeyDCU8 May 2019
My political constitutionalist case for judicial review came out this morning in Int' J' of Constitutional Law. @rpbellamy1 articulates his objections to the case in the same issue. academic.oup.com/icon/articl…

The republican core of the case for judicial review

Abstract. This article makes the case for judicial review based on the idea of freedom as non-domination. It is a democratic case for the institution, root

academic.oup.com
2
15
3
69
Finally, let me assure you that my ignorance of politics (as you perceive it) is as nothing compared to the breathtaking ignorance of the law that many MPs have revealed in relation to Brexit. /ends
6
10
6
93
Gabriel Tan retweeted
pjm1kbw@pjm1kbw8 Apr 2019
Ipekçi v McConnell [2019] EWFC 19: judgment of Mostyn J making needs based award in favour of husband (having decided terms of pre-nuptial agreement were unfair) bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ…
3
4
7
Load more