globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo) header
globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo) profile picture

Creator - Saito Kitties Club https://xitter.gq/t.co/To62LeCZUQ

Travelling the World on Web3
Joined June 2009
Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)Photo by globalnode 🟥 (@globalnodeo)
Every monetary system in human history has encoded the power structure of the civilisation that created it. The dollar encodes American post-war dominance. Bitcoin encodes the libertarian suspicion of institutions held by a small group of technologists in 2008.
1
282
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
Replying to @cz_binance
Binance became the #1 crypto exchange by committing crimes and scamming people This industry would be 1000x better of if Binance went bankrupt and CZ was sent back to prison
16
36
1
256
10,805
Dear @InvsbleFriends There is only 1 of these unique artworks by @a_comic_wizard as part of @satoshibles opensea.io/collection/satosh… the 'Invisible Satoshible; (can you find it!!!) 🤩 opensea.io/item/ethereum/0x8…
1
1
3
68
@bruffstar are you ready for the relaunch
1
1
26
They literally have a cure for #Parkinsons disease and everyone sells it $JUNS strangest trade in history , usa don’t like uk
1
77
Jupiter Neurosciences Inc NASDAQ: $JUNS Jupiter Neurosciences Announces First Patient Dosed In Phase 2A Reset Trial In Parkinson’S Disease Could @MichaelJFoxOrg take a look at this please!
29
This is the post of the year.
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
85
1,052
13
10,732
1,120,836
Just bought my mum a Smeg fridge, best investment I’ve ever made. I’ll never use it or even see it installed but the happiness to help my family out is a greater feeling than any 100x return could ever bring.
3
101
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
Replying to @coinbase
your "decentralized" coin runs on amazon that's it that's the post
4
7
93
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
Plain english version, In bitcoin, if you cheat, you might win. In Saito, if you cheat, you pay for it. Every fake identity you add costs you real money and the guys ahead of you still get paid first. Cheating isn't banned. It's just a losing trade.
What's striking about this story is that the Beijing University of Technology isn't exactly a first-tier school. So for Jiang Zemin to show up is a big deal. By 2003, two years into Hu Jintao's tenure as Party Chairman, almost all of these sorts of public appearances were being handled by Premier Wen Jiabao, which is one reason he developed such a positive reputation. Anyway, the cryptographic technique that eliminates sybilling in distributed networks exploits this same property. if an attacker sybils a routing path (adds extra hops) they can increase the length of the path, but they can't "undo" the chance of winning the payout lottery that is held by earlier hops. The MAXIMUM they can ever earn from sybilling a shared transaction is 50% of the last hop's claim-on-payout (and only this if they add infinite sybil-hops). But since attackers need to contribute their own fees to make up for the extra hops, the cost of adding a fake hop or identity to the network is strictly positive. Cost-of-attack grows faster than expected payouts. This is the underlying source of the asymmetry that defeats the 51% attack -- costs and probabilities are assigned differently over routing paths. Because we can't stop attackers from spending their money/hash/stake to produce blocks, but we can give them worse odds on putting other people's fees into their blocks than they would get otherwise, and with scale this is enough to bankrupt attackers. 平治天下
3
1
9
380
It’s not coming home, but cats are also not just for Christmas @SaitoOfficial #saitokitties @KittiesSaito $SAITO 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🟥🐈
4
176
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
Saito is better than those two people will figure it out soon enough
30 posts in 30 days on Red Square. Come join the conversation at saito.io $SAITO 🟥
6
1
24
1,049
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
Quick update for those curious. York was a useful conference. The economists are much smarter than the computer scientists -- easily a 20 point IQ advantage -- whether working on matching games or auction design or welfare analysis they are tackling problems that involve multi-dimensional variables with indirect casual chains under constraints. They rely on math to understand these causal chains. This is very different from computer science, where people ask, "will people follow protocols," and try to answer by essentially arbitrary assumptions ("majority honest") that come from computer science papers whose underlying assumptions do not map cleanly to those of the frameworks they are using from mechanism design. A good example of this is the way essentially no paper on mechanism design in blockchain asks if block producers *SHOULD* reveal strategic preferences and if IC is possible outside the DSIC space. The conflation of technical and economic frameworks then leads to impossibility results emerging and being treated as standalone truths that hold independently of the assumptions underlying the more foundational techniques they are using, such as the Revelation Principle or Aumann's assumptions about rationality as something that expresses cardinal preferences over fixed distributions, etc. This makes economics superior in a non-obvious way -- whereas essentially no computer scientists understand what a "non-revelation equivalent mechanism" is, economists do understand once you tell them they exist, although from my experience only a minority knew the category existed. This doesn't solve the communication problem, but it makes it more abstract -- to the question of whether incentive problems are possible to solve without truthful bids or fixed distributions (beliefs, discount rates, distributions of types), and the challenge is a passive but polite suspicion that a refusal to define those is a result of sloppiness or laziness. It takes time to break through this -- but it is possible. Once we point to blockchain as involving problem where "truthful bids" are impossible in theory they can see it. And once they realize we can't identify any distribution of types either, they understand we are dealing with a fundamentally difficult problem that falls beyond the scope of their existing toolset. Given this, and some private conversations, I'm optimistic that if we can frame the problem Saito solves appropriately we can break through to people and explain the solution in a way they will understand. But this also means "de-emphasizing" Saito as a mechanism, because no-one will care about the mechanism until they see how implementation is possible without truthful preference revelation. I am working on modifying our presentation for Brazil to focus on this. I have some post-conference emails to write, and will be happy to write them. People are more open-minded as soon as they realize you understand why they value the tools you are not using. So we have a communications challenge, but not an insurmountable one.
7
20
556
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
Imagine having someone listening to your phone calls Imagine someone deciding what you can and can't say Imagine this policing being handled by one institution Imagine having no say in the matter... Our network is the opposite of this scenario!
6
1
23
1,642
globalnode 🟥 retweeted
$SAITO and Apes always belong together. 🟥 Saitozen 😍
1
7
150
If you want to invent the global currency of the future you have to accept by owning a larger share than others you failed the first test. Founder Advantage = Greed (Even if you are anonymous)..
2
68
Original Content Uploader OCU (like NWA, but different)
65
Who is waiting for a peace treaty to be signed before booking a 2026 summer holiday? £10,000 quote for a one week travel insurance could explain it
78
I found the answer
1
58
What should the name be for the new digital currency that everyone one born in the world can claim, and is evenly distributed to all ages nations and sexes. You claim with your birth certificate and it’s lodged on an online ledger for ‘proof of life’ Comment _ birthright?
2
73
—-BREAKING NEWS— SAITO ETF just days away from Wall Street listing! Mega for MAGA $SAITO #saito #etf 🟥 @SaitoOfficial This could be the big one ☝️
1
1
4
581