#NAFO 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 · russia will answer to justice for its crimes · Remove russian poison from Western brains · Donate to defenders of 🇺🇦 · все буде Україна

Joined February 2007
Some thoughts on Twitter of 2024. I refuse to be a flying monkey. jaanus.substack.com/p/i-refu…
14
13
3
80
33,936
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
In retrospect, Putin's true nature revealed itself early on. People mean nothing to him. Never have.
On this day in 2002, Russian forces used fentanyl-based gas to end the Moscow theatre hostage crisis. They didn't tell doctors what gas they had used, leaving them unable to properly treat the victims. Some estimates put the death toll at 130 hostages. Putin thanked the special forces for their bravery.
30
113
5,829
A very good question If Ukraine is so corrupt, then why did putin bribe Trump's family instead of Zelenskyy
If Ukraine is so corrupt, then why did Putin bribe Trump's family instead of Zelenskyi?
6
69
1
181
1,270
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
If Ukraine is so corrupt, then why did Putin bribe Trump's family instead of Zelenskyi?
The trip highlights the remarkable relationship between a son of the US president and a tycoon with a criminal record who has close ties to Vladimir Putin’s personal security service. Intelligence experts say such connections are ripe for manipulation. ft.trib.al/p0LBRYI
5
167
7
584
5,387
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
In this stroller, there is now nothing but a bloody pulp. This is all that remains of the baby after today’s Russian shelling of a park in the Kharkiv region. #MadeByPutin #FinancedByTrump
38
538
35
2,072
108,418
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
A recent post by a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
In this stroller, there is now nothing but a bloody pulp. This is all that remains of the baby after today’s Russian shelling of a park in the Kharkiv region. #MadeByPutin #FinancedByTrump
33
1,608
16
7,259
94,036
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
Ukraine isn’t asking the world to fight our war. We’re asking the world to stop rewarding the country that started it.
573
1,305
36
7,210
55,437
🕯️💔
Honestly, I think this is the article I am most proud of. Eva died in a double-tap strike while trying to rescue people a few minutes from her home. I attended Eva's funeral and met some of those closest to her.
2
9
38
467
Honestly, I think this is the article I am most proud of. Eva died in a double-tap strike while trying to rescue people a few minutes from her home. I attended Eva's funeral and met some of those closest to her.
5
104
2
351
4,004
In 2002, russia used poison gas to kill more than 100 russians in russia
On this day in 2002, Russian forces used fentanyl-based gas to end the Moscow theatre hostage crisis. They didn't tell doctors what gas they had used, leaving them unable to properly treat the victims. Some estimates put the death toll at 130 hostages. Putin thanked the special forces for their bravery.
1
13
1
60
699
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
The best part about this Tesla tweet is that Crimea is Ukraine 🇺🇦👍
14
72
4
1,401
17,986
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
Keep blocking EU sanctions that would keep former Russian soldiers out of the EU, right Spain?
Arrestato ex soldato russo con un arsenale da 5 milioni di euro. Spagna. Catalogna. Figueres. A 25 chilometri dal confine francese. Un magazzino in affitto. All'interno, un'officina sotterranea. 644 armi, migliaia di proiettili, silenziatori, pezzi di ricambio.
20
511
10
2,125
31,831
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
On this day in 2002, Russian forces used fentanyl-based gas to end the Moscow theatre hostage crisis. They didn't tell doctors what gas they had used, leaving them unable to properly treat the victims. Some estimates put the death toll at 130 hostages. Putin thanked the special forces for their bravery.
38
419
16
1,650
27,544
It is good that Vučić was defeated in Serbia But not exactly clear where it goes from here The party that won the elections isn’t exactly “pro-West” and has big domestic challenges
Serbia’s student movement is ideologically diverse: pro-Western, pro-Russian, and neutral voices coexist. What united them was the demand to restore the rule of law. By focusing on democracy rather than foreign policy, they avoided Vučić’s strategy of using geopolitics to polarize society. It was a smart move. Now comes the real test. Russian media appearances today and statements about refusing sanctions on Russia are already emerging. But with a government yet to be formed and presidential elections ahead, it’s too early to draw firm conclusions. Strategic ambiguity may be understandable. Still, Serbia has been here before. After Milošević’s overthrow, nationalism survived the political transition. The last thing Serbia needs is a Koštunica 2.0!! This means, a change of leadership without a fundamental change in direction. Russia’s leverage is structural. Energy dependence gives Moscow political blackmail, while its entrenched ties within Serbia’s intelligence and security apparatus pose another challenge. Changing individuals won’t be enough; institutions and systems must change (especially BIA and military intelligence) . Also, Diversifying energy supplies takes time, but it ultimately comes down to political will. I’m also watching how individuals linked to the security apparatus are repositioning themselves on social media. That’s concerning and telling but I’m mapping … These are patterns worth watching. Serbia’s real transformation won’t be measured by who takes power, but by whether the new leadership is willing to dismantle the system that have kept the country trapped in the same geopolitical cycle. In other words: A change of government is not necessarily a change of system. This will be the most important test.
4
12
59
744
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
I am going to attempt to explain wtf is happening with Iowa politics since apparently we have the closest races and the rest of the country seems to not know how to deal with this. I grew up in very rural Iowa on a tree farm/forest but left at 18 to study in Minnesota and California. Other than education I spent my whole adult life abroad and had residency permits in 9 countries. I visited 76. We used to be a swing state with some strong soldily blue areas (I was in one). We are now MAGA country. Other states are red states but Iowa swung harder and faster to the right than perhaps any other. Voting Republican has screwed over the whole state. This isn't even controversial. Our cancer rate is sky high due to lack of environmental regulation and pollutants in our drinking water, our ag industry and farmers are screwed by cuts to USAID and tariffs, and our manufacting industry screwed by the steel tariffs. Our rural schools are getting way worse and our rural hospitals are closing and people here lost MedicAid coverage. We are all getting screwed by corporations buying rental properties, trailer parks, and farmland. So people should just vote Democrat, right? Republican policies are screwing people over. That is what Des Moines, Iowa City, and Cedar Rapids do every year. Those are the cities and they vote blue. Why are the rural areas not doing that? If you talk to people here who keep voting Republican they will tell you two things: Democrats are way too crazy, weird, and have different values and also they look down on us. This probably sounds odd of petty to some people but look at who the audience is: 1. Rural Iowa is a very sex-segregated society. Men and women do extremely different jobs. People are pretty traditional about that and only now, in 2026, are women starting to enter the trades. I don't know of a single woman who ever took over the family farm herself. 2. People don't go places. They rarely travel. It is HARD for farmers to get away from their farms. It's not uncommon to meet people who have never left the Upper Midwest region. 3. People are happy. They don't necessarily WANT to go places and see a different life. Their extended families are extremely close. Iowa has the second largest average size of weddings, only beat by the Mormons in Utah. People LIKE the lives they are living. They like the food they grown themselves. They like hunting and fishing and drinking a beer. What more could you want? 4. Women are way more likely to leave than men are. All the boys I grew up with stayed unless they joined the military. Why leave if you're taking over the family farm, family business, or can get a good job at a factory? There has always been a bigger need for welders than the local supply. For girls there are far fewer opportunities and we are way more likely to go to college and leave the state. There is a huge brain drain issue where the top achievers academically leave the state as we just don't have some opportunities here. 5. The rural areas are extremely white but not just white they're very insular. Everyone is related to each other somehow and everyone knows each other's business. You will still find people extremely proud of whatever European heritage they have and we still have big festivals where the Dutch, German, or Irish descendants bust out their traditions. My hometown used to have separate churches for the Irish and German Catholics. People came here 6 generations ago and didn't leave. We have our own greeting when we drive past each other on highways we lift the index and middle finger of our right hand from the driving wheel. 6. We have EXTREMELY high civic engagment. Very common to join the National Guard. Pretty much everyone is involved with some kind of community club. People know their neighbors and are still very involved in churches. Local bars in small towns are still packed on weekends and there are tiny towns that draw hundreds or thousands of people for tractor pulls, car shows, or auctions. 7. It's common to meet people who have not done what other people would consider common life experiences. Maybe never had a friend who isn't white, never been on a plane, never been to a major city, never left the USA, never seen the ocean. 8. We are extremely proud of our work ethic and are incredibly self-sufficient. It's common to grow your own food, fix your own clothes, fix your own cars, and do everything yourself. This is how rural areas are. No one else is around to help you so you'll figure it out. Especially for men here working hard and fixing things is basically in the DNA. 9. It's a point of pride to not show off. We have parties in our garages where people bring their lawn chairs and hang out in the garage. People are very proud of their couponing and efficient shopping. People generally aren't into fashion and they have farm jeans and church jeans. 10. We are gettin decimated by cancer. The cancer rates are highest in rural areas and on farms. It's taking out a lot of the community leaders and taking them fast. On my school bus route every single house has someone who has cancer or died of it. This is the audience the Democrats need to persuade and they have done a terrible job doing it. People are traditional, haven't experienced many things other people did, but are very proud and very happy with who they are. For the Democrats to win they need to tell people that they are not trying to change you. The message rural people are getting from Democrats is you are backwards, you are bigots, you are not sophisticated, and we are better than you are. I'm sure someone will respond to this with some point about how they really are bigots but THAT IS NOT THE POINT because to persuade people to your side they have to FEEL they can be on the same side as you and if you tell them that everything is wrong about them when they are overall happy with their lives then they will just say go fuck yourselves, which is what a lot of them did. No one wants to be looked down on. No one wants to be treated like they are not equals. Every person I know who is from a rural area and did what I did and went to an elite school got the same feeling that people look down on us. If it offends us when we are the ones who left then of course it will offend people who stayed. The Democrats have the right policies but have completely failed to relate to their audience in Iowa.
18
8
1
44
2,205
Mearsheimer is full of shit and keeps contradicting his own theory
Why the War Was the West's Fault — and Why Mearsheimer Is 100% Wrong I'm always puzzled by people who profess to be huge fans of Mearsheimer because of the supposed depth and strength of his theory of Realism, and who seem totally unaware that his own theory shows that his takes on the war in Ukraine are wrong. Start with the word that frames his entire position. His 2014 essay in Foreign Affairs was titled "Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault," and everything he has said since repeats that verdict: the West provoked Russia by expanding NATO, so the West is to blame for the war. But fault is not a category in Realism. The theory is about incentives and constraints, not blame. If we translate "fault" into something the theory can work with, namely the key cause that made the war happen, then his own theory assigns it to the opposite of what he asserts. The West didn't cause the war by threatening Russia. It caused it by failing to make aggression costly. 1/5
1
17
315
🇪🇪🫶🇺🇦
I spoke with the newly elected President of Estonia. I congratulated Ülle Madise @YlleMadise on taking office. Ukraine always wishes the people of Estonia nothing but success and the achievement of all their goals. I am grateful for the much-needed and right signals – Estonia’s support in all areas will continue. Estonia is also closely following the diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving peace. I shared details of the talks in Oslo and our communication with the American side following their meeting in Russia. There is an agreement to hold a trilateral meeting at the team level as early as November, and it is important that the meeting is not postponed. Ukraine is ready for negotiations at any time, and our position is that the sooner the talks begin, the better. Of course, like Estonia and other partners, we have always advocated for Europe’s presence in the negotiations. Europe must have a say in all formats that can deliver real decisions. We also discussed the consequences of Russian strikes, particularly on our energy infrastructure and railways. Russia is deliberately trying to destroy our locomotives, and therefore any support that helps increase our rolling stock of this type would be very helpful. Thank you, Estonia!
4
33
453
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
Elon Musk's statement about needing to have pity for Russian conscripts is the ultimate act of cynicism and hypocrisy. If Elon wants the war to stop and Russian conscripts not to die, the thing to do is help Ukraine win as quickly as possible, rather than forcing Ukraine to sacrifice itself. A Ukrainian victory is the only way to save the lives of the Russians Musk sympathizes with so deeply.
206
2,062
31
10,189
126,314
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
Any talks/negotiations about a post-war security arrangement for Europe need to start from the indisputable fact that Russia’s neighbours have an acute need of protection from Russia whereas Russia has no demonstrable need for protection (and it already has nukes for that).
7
27
6
148
4,542
Jaanus K 🇪🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦 retweeted
“Communism is great in theory, but doesn’t work in practice.” Still hear that a lot. But it’s like saying: “Well, the recipe is great but every time we bake a cake from it we end up poisoning everyone.” Yeah, that doesn’t sound like a great recipe actually. After many tens of millions dead, we should acknowledge that communism is bad in theory and bad in practice. It’s economic illiteracy combined with horrific ideas about establishing a dictatorship (oh, temporarily sure) and persecuting an ever expanding list of enemies, which will eventually include everyone who points out that it’s not working. The fact that it’s dressed up in sanctimonious, self-aggrandising rhetoric about freeing workers (who a lot of Marxists would shudder to have a conversation with) doesn’t make any of that better. It just provides an excuse to commit atrocities for the supposed great good - with that post-dictatorship utopia always at least one more murder away. If it can reach the point of justifying the Nazi-Soviet Pact and persecuting entire nationalities then there is no low to which it cannot sink. You know what is great in theory? Democratic institutions and norms, checks and balances, independent civil societies, freedom of speech and assembly, human rights, etc, etc. Those things are superior in theory, superior in practice, and there’s nothing remotely redeeming about those who would throw them away no matter where on the political spectrum they put themselves.
57
226
12
1,034
50,311