Pinned Tweet
Whenever we talk about Africa's developmental dilemma, we often hear that the problem is weak institutions. But this raises an important question.... how do strong institutions come into being in the first place?
What is lost on most people is that the Western liberal democracies that we desperately admire and are attempting to emulate did not start as full democracies. They conveniently want us to forget that until a few decades ago many of them were ruled by monarchs. Their state capacity was built through earlier periods of consolidation brought about by royal/imperial decree.
This is not a trivial issue.
Indeed, Europe's states were hammered into shape over centuries through monarchies and empires that centralized authority, imposed common laws, built taxation systems, and forged national identities through violence and coercion.
The same is true for East Asia. Japan's Meiji Restoration in the late 1800s concentrated authority in the hands of the Emperor who drove rapid institutional and economic reform before mass democracy took hold. Even China, after decades of fragmentation and war, achieved territorial and administrative reconsolidation under a strong centralized state. In their case they are yet to be fully democratic so maybe I shouldn't even bring them up.
But we could add Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore to the list. Malaysia and Singapore both started as parliamentary democracies post independence but realised it didn't work so they both became single party de facto dictatorships.
Mahathir Mohamad built a strong Malaysian state apparatus, a development bureaucracy, industrial policy, and planning bodies that did outlast him. Lee Kuan Yew and his government built a state that didn't depend on Lee personally. He left office, and the machinery kept running - with a capable civil service, strong agencies, and statutory boards.
South Korea was authoritarian for decades and only made a democratic turn in 1987. Today they more more democratic and have strong institutions.
As you can see, historically, concentrated power has almost always preceded the creation of the very institutions that later make stable democracy possible.
Africa skipped this stage completely.
Colonial borders created African states that contain many peoples of varying ethnicities, with distinct languages, histories, and loyalties. Independence delivered the States, but not Nations in the deeper political sense. African countries are being expected to democratise, build national identity, extend state authority, build institutions, and deliver development all at once. This is like asking a baby to run a marathon before it can even crawl!
Family, clan, and tribe have thus unfortunately remained the most reliable institutions of trust in Africa. Why? Because when the state feels fragile, distant, or incompetent, people will naturally gravitate towards those age-old networks. And once you introduce electoral politics under these conditions, patronage and nepotism become survival strategies that inevitably undermine the building of impartial national institutions that are necessary for a functional democracy.
Why didn't Africa have its Lee Kuan Yew?
Post independence Africa DID produce its own would-be nationbuilders. Leaders who sought to break with colonial legacies, and wished to rapidly transform their countries. But many of these revolutionary projects were built around that single leader's vision. And when that leader fell, whether through death, overthrow, or exit, there was no institutional foundation to carry forward and sustain what little progress was achieved under his rule. Our countries thus fell into a repeating pattern... each presidential successor, convinced that his vision alone is what will redeem the state, dismantles what came before. So the country hits reset, again and again, repeatedly rebuilding the machinery of state instead of accumulating institutional momentum.
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
There's a strange thing that happens online and in real world conversations, where understanding or explaining an idea or phenomenon is interpreted as SUPPORTING it.
As a result, people pretend to not understand things, lest they be seen as advocating them.
😂😂😂
Replying to @woshiok
Francja miała bronić Polski na wypadek wojny, jak było każdy wie. Ten żart mówi wszystko "Dlaczego francuskie czołgi mają pięć biegów?
– Cztery wsteczne i jeden do przodu.
• A po co w nich ten jeden bieg do przodu?
– Na wypadek, gdyby wróg zaatakował od tyłu"
PARETO principle
Replying to @TicTocTick
Having worked at Google and Microsoft, I can tell you that 80% of the workforce does very little work, yet makes the most of all the perks… restaurants, barber, video games and even free cinema…
Hahahaha
Russian President Vladimir Putin told the leaders of dozens of African nations that Moscow was their best partner, accusing the ‘colonial’ West of still trying to exploit the continent's resources. The Kremlin is hosting a two-day Russia-Africa Summit.
Putin: Russia is African continent's best partner, not ‘colonial’ West
More on Aljazeera.com
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
This is how a typical day working at Microsoft looked like.
These jobs aren’t coming back. AI will do them.
Factory worker brain from 60 years ago cannot comprehend such working conditions.
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
She's clearly his girlfriend and probably there on his dime but refuses to kiss him on camera just incase a footballer sees her and madly falls in love with her. Hypergamy is brutal.
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
Mao was obviously a dictator.
Under “dictator” Mao, life expectancy in China increased by 30 years, literacy rates went from 20% to 70%, steel output grew from 1 million to 23 million tons, 47 million hectares of land was taken from landlords and given to peasants, and China was unified under a strong central state and got nuclear weapons.
Despite his failures, it does not take a rocket scientist to understand why Mao is revered in China.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Mao's Great Leap Forward and related policies caused an estimated 30-45 million famine deaths in 1959-1961 alone, with total excess deaths under his rule often estimated at 40 million or higher.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chi…
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC43…
chinafile.com/library/nyrb-c…
I'm okay with warlords if after capturing power they outsource the management of their critical sectors to capable entities or individuals. Personally I'm not hellbent on African countries having democracy.
Africa engineered a political culture where the sharpest minds are systematically sidelined, while the gates of leadership remain open only to soldiers, warlords, or men with deep, unyielding links to the barracks.
The state is an instrument of force, and those who control the tools of violence control the treasury.
This historical inertia has created a permanent structural discount on intelligence, merit, and institutional competence.
In a functional, rules-based society, power is contested through ideas, policy execution, and economic logic.
It requires a clinical, cold understanding of global capital flows, resource management, and human capital development. But in our political arenas, those traits are actually viewed as liabilities.
A highly educated technocrat with world-class ideas cannot survive an environment where the ultimate veto power belongs to the man who can mobilize a battalion or command a militia.
Consequently, we have institutionalized a tragic brain drain within our own governance structures.
Intellectual brilliance is forced to seek refuge in corporate boardrooms, international organizations, or foreign universities, leaving the fate of millions in the hands of people whose only qualification is their proximity to a rifle.
We wonder why our institutions are fragile, why our economies stagnate, and why policy failure is the default setting across the continent. The answer is unsentimental: you cannot build a sophisticated, modern knowledge economy when your gatekeepers are operating on the primitive logic of survival of the fittest.
As long as the badge of leadership is measured by the capacity for violence rather than the depth of ideas, the continent will remain trapped in a cyclical low-growth trap.
True sovereignty and development do not come from the cheap dopamine hit of revolutionary rhetoric backed by military decrees. They come from robust basic education, rigid property rights, free markets, and institutional structures that outlast any strongman.
Until we consciously shift our governance models away from partisan muscle and embrace a ruthless, clinical meritocracy, raw savagery will continue to dictate the future of African brilliance.
Best to be at the airport 2 hours before check-in
So I got to the airport in Heathrow (London) and I couldn't find @FlyRwandAir because it wasn't on the screens and no one really knew where it was. By the time I finally found their check in counter they closed it in my face. I wanted to cry but everyone I called said all this is normal with Rwanda air. Why didn't anyone warn me? I just missed my flight.
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
So I got to the airport in Heathrow (London) and I couldn't find @FlyRwandAir because it wasn't on the screens and no one really knew where it was. By the time I finally found their check in counter they closed it in my face. I wanted to cry but everyone I called said all this is normal with Rwanda air. Why didn't anyone warn me? I just missed my flight.
They just want to hate the West so they pay you lip service. I wouldn't be surprised if that $14 is mostly guns and maybe some grain.
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
Other people achieved all this in the 20th century without murderous dictatorships.
Under “dictator” Mao, life expectancy in China increased by 30 years, literacy rates went from 20% to 70%, steel output grew from 1 million to 23 million tons, 47 million hectares of land was taken from landlords and given to peasants, and China was unified under a strong central state and got nuclear weapons.
Despite his failures, it does not take a rocket scientist to understand why Mao is revered in China.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Mao's Great Leap Forward and related policies caused an estimated 30-45 million famine deaths in 1959-1961 alone, with total excess deaths under his rule often estimated at 40 million or higher.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chi…
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC43…
chinafile.com/library/nyrb-c…
James Onen | FATBOY retweeted
Several African economies are growing at a breakneck speed. So why is that million in the continent are not feeling the benefits of that growth?
Credit to Deng Xioping for the reforms that overhauled Mao's disastrous "Great Leap Forward" which impoverished China and killed tens of millions.
Replying to @D162Michele
The 'Great Leap Forwards' was a failure. The Cultural Revolution was a failure. China was poor and backwards from 1949 until 1976. China suffered from a Great Famine in 1958-1962 that killed 30-46 million people. Mao was responsible for these disasters. Mao was from a bad neighborhood in Hell.

























