Jin (@jinthagerman) profile picture

Building stuff

Joined September 2010
Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)Photo by Jin (@jinthagerman)
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances. What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation. Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture. It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off. Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle. It starts with METR. Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models. He proposes METR for this purpose. But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock. Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio. And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem. This stock was worth $500 million early last year. It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later. METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth. Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well. But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much. The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all. The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll. If this were the end of it, that's bad. But that isn't all. The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom. The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others. They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's. All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile. As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder. Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created. From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts. This itself is an objective fact. The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it. But the problem also goes in the other direction: If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die. Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen. Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly. They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic. And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly. What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations. The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture. And that feedback loop is winning. That's what Jacob Coxon is. China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China. America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level. Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences. Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully. It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America. Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear. Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers. Congress must investigate. Evidence and Github in next post. Then some supplementary figures.
1,534
9,581
2,055
33,912
6,583,245
Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier. Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want. Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well. So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it. If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.
3,393
12,247
2,709
71,790
9,642,858
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
20,437
166,877
39,459
799,786
175,536,544
Someone make a decent foldable color e-ink phone and I’ll abandon the Apple ecosystem for Android just for that.
57
I want this with a colour e-ink display
Eliza + elizaOS Welcome to the new interaction paradigm. Notes, calendar, browser, messaging, wallet, social media and everything else you use your phone for. Completely driven by chat and voice. Eliza comes as an app on mobile and desktop and as a full operating system built on Android OSP and Debian Linux. Also available in the web and accessible from your favorite social platform or messaging app. Fully open source at github.com/elizaos/eliza We’re raising and looking for hardware partners and cracked builders to help us redefine our relationship to our devices— at home, at the office, in our hands and soon in robots. We have a lot more coming to show in coming videos, including dynamic UI, instant deployed apps and tools to manage every aspect of your life. Thanks to @UseCorgi for letting us drink coffee and ship at 5am Thanks to @solanamobile for making an awesome phone for development
101
The real unlock of “free” inference from local models is creativity. Just creating for the sake of creating. Frontier is powerful and easy and still pretty cheap. But free is different. Yes, the upfront cost atm is huge but the upfront cost of current intelligence will get cheaper and cheaper.
Melee.c - super smash bros melee, decompiled and reverse engineered into 5000 lines or so of c All done with deepseek flash 0731, from my phone, while I'm hanging out with my newborn
120
"Web servers are text in, text out." "LLMs are text in, text out." So what if the LLM IS the web server? No templates, no routes, every page invented on the spot. Clicking a button is just sending the next message. Terrible idea. Built it anyway. Have a play while I still have credit: token-burner.fly.dev
3
1
3
131
Despite what people are saying Claude tag is a genuine step in the right direction but why stop there? This assumes all context is in slack. Build Tag for group voice discussions or Tag for ambient office listening.
1
1
65
I really enjoyed talking with the Auckland Prompt Poets Society this evening. I spoke about how we build multi-agent & multi-model agents on @autohiveai, how they improve quality vs single agents and will be how many future agents work in the next 6-18 months. Solid turn out, great questions. Discussing orchestration, where it makes sense to break agents apart, how context positioning can be solved, etc. a lot of this knowledge has been built up through delivering Autohive and almost four years of pushing really hard on AI. A lot of fun, thanks for having me!
3
3
14
660
The irony here 😅
Build your own keyboard at Compile
39
So Anthropic secures a huge swath of compute from SpaceX and now we have a release imminent 🤔
JUST IN: Anthropic announces it will roll out Claude Mythos “in the coming weeks” despite growing fears over the model’s cyber capabilities.
43
Is AI coding just declarative meta programming? 🤔
22
Replying to @jinthagerman
Yeah we’ve been working on improving reliability. It should be feeling better lately, expect it to improve more
1
1
8
4,398
I hate that I feel obligated to do this but this is the most condescending post I’ve read on this platform. I dono how you thought this would land but geez.
A letter to my friends at Anthropic I hate that I feel obligated to do this. I hate that I've had to be so harsh towards Anthropic for the past few months. I really, really don't want to. I know it might feel like I'm doing this for clicks or something, but I promise I'm not. My pro-Anthropic content ALWAYS outperforms my anti-Anthropic content. I have cost myself a lot of money, opportunities, sponsors, and more. I'm doing this because you work for an evil cult. I'm begging you to wake up. Your CEO, Dario, does not respect engineers. This is obvious. He couldn't make it more obvious if he tried (and I think he's trying pretty hard) You know this, but you don't want to acknowledge it. It has kept you up many nights. You know that bad code is shipping to users. You know that one bad tweet might get you fired. You fear for your vesting schedules. You're afraid. Nobody deserves what you're going through right now. You go to work afraid, you leave work afraid, and you go to YouTube to keep up on the dev world, just to hear me yelling all about how evil your company is. You deserve better. You might not feel like you do, but you know deep down that this isn't right. I hope you know how deeply I feel for you. I'm sorry. I know I haven't helped you much individually, and I want to be better about this. If you're ready to leave, please hit me up. I swear I'll never tell a soul. I have friends at every lab and most startups in the AI world. Most of them would be down to match your current vesting schedules, possibly even go beyond. If you're staying for the money, I beg you to hit me up. We can make the money happen somewhere that hates you less. I know I'm asking for a lot of trust here, and that you're scared after seeing how hard I've been on Anthropic. I can't blame you at all for that. I should have posted something like this months ago. That's my failure to own and I will own it to my best ability. If you're willing to trust me in this moment, I can make it right. Let me help you escape. You deserve to work somewhere that you can have impact. Somewhere that listens when you feel something is wrong. Somewhere that won't fire you when you point out the things that hurt your users. My DMs are always open to you. When you're ready, let me know. I promise to make it right.
125
On Repo Bench Opus 4.7 scores meaningfully worse than 4.6, which did worse than 4.5 With this score it's no longer in the top 25
12
15
7
271
28,919
My take on Anthropic's new Mythos model: Don't worry about it. It might be amazing, it might be disruptive. But there's nothing you can do about it. Ignore the hype, keep your head down and keep learning, growing and creating. Adopt this: Relentless Optimism.
137
169
25
2,402
58,784
Jin retweeted
no no i've definitely been doing a lot of work it's all just too dangerous to release
111
445
47
7,816
500,091
I say this as a mostly very happy Claude Code user but the last week has been weird and it's been bugging me: - Anthropic are obviously struggling with inference demand and also trading off compute for inference with compute for training - If you need evidence of this, see OpenClaw bans, see pretty consistent model quality concerns from the community, see patchy inference speeds, see off peak 2x limits - There is no world where I believe they are gating Mythos for safety alone. If they could release it publicly, they would - Enterprise is going to pay through the nose for the Mythos inference they have available - They can now delay distillation from 3rd parties indefinitely - And it allows them to build hype and desirability which they can parlay into more compute investment - Don't fall for the hype or the doom, remember they just leaked the source for Claude Code, yet they have the "most sophisticated cyber security model ever" 🤔
1
1
61
They have a openclaw sized hole in their inference compute budget now, wonder what replaces that...
1
26