I want Justice to be brought back to the US markets and the political class. MMTLP exposes more than just regulatory fraud against investors.
Joined September 2023
- Tweets91.7K
- Following1.6K
- Followers958
- Likes189K
Pinned Tweet
Hate to break it to you, but Congress isn't going to act. They are desperately trying to not be in the middle on this one. They are biding time until SEC can finish their investigation. #MMTLP Unless we all decide to go to DC en mass. JMO
John Smith retweeted
MMTLP EXCLUSIVE
It took a million investor contacts.
It took 8 attempts by Greg Mccabe, CEO of Nextbridge Hydrocarbons.
It took Lara Logan.
It took Charles Payne.
In the screenshot below we can FINALLY REVEAL a draft response from the Great Chair Paul Atkins, leader of the most PRESTIGIOUS financial regulator in the best country in the whole wide world...
Ready?
Sure?
3,2,1...
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
John Smith retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
John Smith retweeted
This man is a Computer Scientist and he looked at my post regarding California’s identical election results for top government positions
🚨 He CONFIRMS from a computer scientist programming perspective how the results ARE FROM AN ALGORITHM, NOT REAL VOTE TOTALS 👇 IT’S RIGGED
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
John Smith retweeted
Anyone else in MMTLP missing out on real-time investment opportunities?
@SECPaulSAtkins meet with Greg McCabe. You know him, he's reached out 8 times.
The President Trump Administration should move immediately taking down all forms of Fraud, to include the Market Manipulation, Foreign Interference, SEC/FINRA Collusion and Corruption of MMTLP
@SusieWiles47 @Potus @cvpayne
John Smith retweeted
This 🧵 thread shows how FINRA's actions can be considered a pump & dump that misled investors/holders of MMTLP...
A "Pump & Dump" according to Google Gemini and it how compares to the actions of @FINRA (12/6/22-12/8/22).
"The Pump: Fraudsters will spread false or misleading information about a company's stock. This can be done through social media, chatrooms, or even fake press releases. The goal is to create a buying frenzy that drives the stock price up."
On 12/6/22, FINRA posted the first $MMTLP Corporate Action to their Daily List. This Corporate Action included a "false" 12/13/22 SHARE CANCELLATION DATE & Zero hour 12/13/22 EFFECTIVE DATE. <-These both should've been 12/14/22 at a time that coincides with AFTER market close.
(This in many ways violated FINRA Rules 6490 & 2020)
Based on FINRA's assertion, MMTLP was never intended to trade after 12/8 which means that the sentence included in both MMTLP Corporate Actions; "Purchases of MMTLP executed after 12/8/22 will not receive the distribution." was "misleading" due to the fact that it implied that purchases could be made after 12/8.
Multiple brokerages informed their clients of how they intended to handle trading in MMTLP after 12/8/22.
For many investors, FINRA posting the Corporate Action was the last thing they were waiting for before they decided to either buy, hold or sell MMTLP. When you observe the increase in volume (beginning 12/6), it resembles what could be considered a "buying frenzy" that drove the stock price up.
"The Dump: Once the price is inflated, the scammers will quickly sell their own shares of the stock at the higher price. This is the "dump" part of the scheme."
On 12/8/22, FINRA posted a revised MMTLP Corporate Action, validating the impression that the initial Corporate Action contained false and or misleading information.
OTC Markets gave MMTLP the caveat emptor designation on 12/8 (after more than a year of trading) due to the confusion caused by the release of the two MMTLP Corporate Actions.
The price dropped dramatically on this day, presumably due to short sellers selling &/or market manipulation, including during premarket hours (15% +/- drop) where the investing public didn't have the ability to trade on the OTC.
(FINRA Rule 11893 violation)
"The Crash: Inevitably, after the scammers sell their shares, the price of the stock plummets. Investors who boughtin based on the hype end up losing money."
12/8/22 had the most volume but most of that appears to be from short selling which caused "the price of the stock to plummet".
"Pump and dump schemes typically target small, thinly-traded companies because it's easier to manipulate their stock price. They're
illegal and there are regulatory bodies that watch for this kind of activity."
MMTLP was a small, thinly-traded security due to the fact that it was never meant to trade and the majority of the shares being most likely held by $TRCH shareholders. This made the price easy to manipulate especially since it appears that regulators weren't concerned with investigating the true cause of this trading activity.
@SECGov @SECEnfDirector @GaryGensler @HesterPeirce @The_DTCC @FBI @FBIWFO @FBILosAngeles @TheJusticeDept @DOJCrimDiv @RepRalphNorman @MikeCrapo @denniskneale
#MMTLPsetaDATE
John Smith retweeted
Here's more evidence that FINRA did more than just merely announce the MMTLP Corporate Actions.
Someone needs to get FINRA to explain why they hijacked the Corporate Actions to focus on Share Cancellation and Symbol Deletion Effective the zero hour of December 13th.
Trading Symbols don't get Deleted before Shares get Cancelled! @NewYorkFBI @TheJusticeDept
John Smith retweeted
More Real Estate lawyers/non Securities lawyers!
Why? I think it's because they're naive to the fact that they're lying/believing what they were told by FINRA.
In image 1 it shows that they claim @FINRA merely announced the Corporate Action.
Image 2 shows that neither MMTLP Corporate Action matches what the SEC made effective on 11/18/22.
Image 3 is one of many images proving that FINRA was responsible for changing the MMTLP Corporate Actions, not just "merely announcing" them.
Based on their professional profiles, neither John Mitchell nor Elias George specializes in defending regulatory bodies like FINRA against complex securities exchange litigation, market structure disputes, or federal regulatory challenges.
John Mitchell's background at Faegre Drinker centers on commercial litigation, environmental law, creditors' rights, foreclosure, and consumer fraud/class action defense.
Elias George focuses on land use, zoning, entitlements, real estate, and general commercial/shareholder disputes.
For matters concerning the Over-the-Counter (OTC) market, SEC oversight, or SRO (Self-Regulatory Organization) immunity and regulatory enforcement, institutions typically retain specialized securities litigation and regulatory defense practices, such as attorneys from firms with deep pools of former SEC or FINRA enforcement lawyers, rather than attorneys whose primary concentrations are in real estate, land use, and general commercial disputes.
@TheJusticeDept @SECPaulSAtkins
Why won't the SEC just meet with Next Bridge Hydrocarbons?
🚨 $MMTLP — FINRA RESPONDS TO WILLIAM KELLY’S APPEAL ⚖️
📅 FILED: November 6, 2026
🏛️ U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
📁 Kelly v. FINRA • Appeal No. 26-5634
📄 FINRA’s Answering Brief • Docket Entry 8.1
❤️ For shareholders and families supporting William Kelly’s effort to obtain accountability, here’s what FINRA is arguing.
‼️ THIS IS NOT A FINAL RULING. This is FINRA asking the appeals court to uphold the dismissal of Kelly’s lawsuit over its handling of MMTLP and the December 2022 trading halt.
🔎 WHAT IS FINRA SAYING?
🛡️ “OUR REGULATORY ACTIONS ARE PROTECTED.”
FINRA argues that announcing the corporate action and halting trading were regulatory functions covered by absolute regulatory immunity—a legal shield against these claims.
🚧 “KELLY DOESN’T HAVE A RIGHT TO SUE US UNDER THESE RULES.”
FINRA argues that the laws and rules Kelly cites do not provide an individual right to bring these claims against it.
📉 “THE FRAUD CLAIM DOESN’T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.”
FINRA says Kelly has not sufficiently explained the alleged fraud or his reliance on it. It also argues that retaining his shares, rather than purchasing or selling in reliance on the alleged misinformation, prevents this particular securities-fraud claim.
🏢 “WE ARE NOT THE GOVERNMENT.”
FINRA argues that it is a private organization, not a government actor, so Kelly’s Fifth Amendment claim cannot proceed against it.
🚫 “ANOTHER REWRITE WON’T FIX THE CASE.”
FINRA asks the court to uphold the denial of another opportunity to amend Kelly’s complaint, arguing these barriers would remain.
💔 WHY THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING:
Shareholders want answers about what happened to their investment. FINRA’s response argues that legal protections and limits on these claims prevent Kelly from obtaining relief through this lawsuit.
⚖️ Those are FINRA’s positions. The appeals court must decide whether the dismissal should stand. Filing this response does not mean FINRA has won the appeal.
❤️ Support for Kelly continues as he pursues that challenge.
📎 FINRA’s full response is attached, along with its front page.
⚠️ Not legal advice.
dropbox.com/scl/fi/kq0p7pnsa…
John Smith retweeted
So let me get this straight: Texas voted to be more like California because the price of gas rose about 75 cents a gallon.
Gasoline in Blue California is twice as much as it is in Texas, the average home costs twice as much and they pay over 13% in state taxes
Makes sense 🤔
John Smith retweeted
🚨MASSIVE PEDOPHILE TAKEDOWN: 13 from Disney, 4 from Universal and scores of Democrat imported illegal aliens among those arrested in this Florida child sex operation.
The midterms—all about Democrats importing more pedophiles and emptying out prisons.
John Smith retweeted
You can mock Jesus all day and it’s protected speech.
Question Muhammad and you’re suddenly a bigot.
In dozens of countries, criticizing Islam isn’t just frowned upon, it’s a crime. Sometimes a death sentence.
I’m sick of the double standards.
John Smith retweeted
Stephen Miller is intellectually lethal. His brilliance is unmatched, and his opponents know it.
John Smith retweeted
Why is the @SECGov ignoring the fact that @FINRA deletes Trading Symbols when a Share is Cancelled, not 40 hours before?
This was the change that FINRA made to the MMTLP Corporate Action.
A link to the full video 🎥 can be found in the quote post below @FBILosAngeles
🚨 🎥 🚨 New Video🚨 🎥 🚨 11/6/26
"MMTLP: FINRA's Fraud aka The Case Against Steven P. Dapcic Part 2"
When you're as knowledgeable about Corporate Actions & settlement as Steven P. Dapcic, and when you're known to be outspoken on these subjects...
How do you explain his silence concerning MMTLP???
youtu.be/54XQYLBflgY?is=Y-8M…
John Smith retweeted
Of course they used a 15% algorithm to shave 15% of Republican voters off and flip them to Democrats Across the Nation
That perfectly explains the exact numbers matching 25% to 30% flip to Democrats in every county
🚨BREAKING: Every single one of Texas’s 254 counties shifted left from 2024 in the Senate race.
Not most. Not nearly all. All 254. James Talarico improved on Kamala Harris’s margins statewide, including in deep-red rural counties. The same pattern showed up in Mississippi, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and other states.
This is not a normal!!!
John Smith retweeted
It is only possible when you cheat. It can be built into the software and front loaded into the machines before the polls even open. Or it can be done in real time by accessing the servers.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
John Smith retweeted
Hey everyone, @SECPaulSAtkins has been working hard on transparency.
Look at these FOIA redactions. It's a perfect metaphor for how transparent this failing regulator is.
John Smith retweeted
Next to me, Stephen Miller is the strongest MAHA supporter in the administration. It’s time to unleash the Kraken.
"I am pleased to announce that Mr. Stephen Miller, the current Deputy Chief of Staff of the Trump Administration, and one of my most trusted advisors, will become the Chief of Staff starting Monday, November 9, 2026. Susie Wiles, who has done an outstanding job, will be moving over to the Trump Political Operation. I want to thank her for her service as Chief of Staff — She has done a great job!" - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
