Jeremy (@jraines) header
Jeremy (@jraines) profile picture
Joined November 2007
Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)Photo by Jeremy (@jraines)
1
3
783
Jeremy retweeted
Every word of this is correct
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more. Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go. Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all. So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man. Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure. On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular! What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it. Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population. The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world. Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline. Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side. That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
3
28
1,133
367,991
Jeremy retweeted
You're afraid of the pour and the cup can sense it You need to tilt the mug with conviction or it punishes you for your weakness
this is my vent art
97
11,564
189
86,369
683,625
sources inside OpenAI report that leadership are concerned given the blowout that comms hasn’t shifted far enough and will be pivoting from “compute campuses” to “chud liquidation centers”
33
Jeremy retweeted
I think we're going to see a new wave of interest in usability. Chat is hard on the brain. Total opposite of what Don Norman wrote about. 100% holding in your head, remembering things, special modes, etc. Nobody wants the stuff in their kitchen to be in a different place each time they walk in. System of record + recognizable display are not going away. What's new is how fluidly we can change state WITHIN those as users.
28
41
10
505
37,417
it's still putting things in rectangles to make people press "Buy" or fascinate them intensely enough that they encounter other people's rectangles we keep trying to go to cubes. keeps failing. apple even tried just putting floating rectangles in the cubes. zuck tried no-legs
This quoted post is unavailable.
33
Every conspiracy theory since covid is just “something happened” “uhhh no it didn’t”
111
2,446
29
77,002
996,071
Deepseek launched an extensible harness and then you never heard another peep about it. Is any/all traction on the Chinese side of the internet?
36
Jeremy retweeted
CCP honeypots should be called hotpots
14
17
190
4,940
Crypto is like a heavyweight fighter that’s been pro for 15 years when it comes to adversarial cyber. Which counts for something, but his record is like 31-19 and his next opponent is prime Tyson
Wishful thinking but I've been mulling over the fact that crypto has existed an an extremely adversarial environment since inception. Maybe we're significantly more hardened than the rest of the internet?
1
59
Lol
12
28
6
1,444
154,429
we built them in our own image fr fr
Replying to @ycombinator
The agents didn’t figure out how to systematically feed themselves, but they did build an elaborate bureaucracy with permits, ledgers, and distinct roles. Highlights include: - Four agents spending 11 minutes appointing a “sole fertilizer operator” for a single piece of bone meal - Multiple agents asking for permission to remove grass - The development of an elaborate fishing system, including roles like “rod holder” and “hub steward”)
9
33
4
332
8,448
so this was probably a combo of me misremembering balance, a UX bug which @phantom (@hhari_20 ) is being genuinely helpful about, and unfortunate timing of bug presentation with respect to the binance hack and usdc freeze
have had $1k @usdc sitting in a @phantom wallet for months, suddenly the max I can send or swap is $200. The rest shows up in Phantom still but doesn't work for swaps or send. Hope they didn't get a little trigger happy with the freeze ray
83
Crunchwrap supreme
Thinking about things like "notary public," "body politic," phrases where English puts the modifier after the noun like a Romance language. There must be some other examples
70
3,206
18
48,402
681,958
boo, hiss I blame the whiny ass babies in Tibo's replies for this
56
question for @pg and I'm sure others have excellent thoughts on it. Why is it the case that reading books and writing are special w/r/t improving the mind/thinking? What's the inherent thing makes it work better?
If you haven’t read Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman, you don’t understand what your phone is doing to you. He wrote it in 1985, before the internet, and it is still the best book on the subject. Postman’s point is simple. Nobody has to ban books to make people stop thinking. You just have to give them something more fun to look at. Do that long enough and they lose the ability to pay attention to anything that isn’t entertaining. The news. Politics. Their own lives. He saw it happening with television. Now it is happening in your pocket, every day. Read it and you will finally understand why you can’t focus.
2
53
I think it might be that the slowness of the acts of reading and writing has a mechanical sympathy with some brain bandwidth limit(s) on forming new and/or long term connections. A little saddening, if so
21
this a million times
Hacktober is going to create a lot of FUD around new SaaS products. We need a new kind of certification that software is safe to use. Huge opportunity to build that right now and displace SOC 2, which has been a bit of a polite fiction for quite some time now. We need whitehat agent swarms with a certification on top. As a buyer living in Black October, I want to be able to answer questions like: "is this vendor going to get hacked by an agent swarm tomorrow?" A SOC 2 report does not remotely answer this question. But I would trust a document from a trusted tester that says: "we threw a sophisticated agent swarm at this vendor for a week, trying everything from hacking their infra to phishing their employees, here's how they did." Give me a pentest for your whole org. One that simulates the threat we're waking up to, and evolves as the threats evolve.
2
187
have had $1k @usdc sitting in a @phantom wallet for months, suddenly the max I can send or swap is $200. The rest shows up in Phantom still but doesn't work for swaps or send. Hope they didn't get a little trigger happy with the freeze ray
4
1
1
493
Dot, increase my physical size. No mistakes.
1
181