Computer Scientist, AI Creator, CPU Designer, Entrepreneur
Brisbane, Queensland
Joined December 2008
- Tweets691
- Following333
- Followers311
- Likes546
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Eve's eyes were not opened when she ate the fruit. Creation did not fracture, and the sentence of death did not fall.
Everything remained suspended until Adam ate. That is the scandal we overlook. Humanity did not fall with the woman, but with the man.
Genesis 3:6-7 records the sequence plainly.
The woman took the fruit and ate, then gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. Only then were the eyes of both opened.
This is why Paul writes in Romans 5:12 that sin entered the world through one man. In 1 Timothy 2:14, he notes that Eve was deceived, yet he never traces condemnation to her.
Adam was the priest-king charged to guard the sanctuary, having received the command directly before Eve was formed. His calling was to silence the lie and protect his bride, yet he stood beside her in absolute silence.
God's indictment in Genesis 3:17 names the charge: because you listened to the voice of your wife and ate from the tree.
When Eve fell, Adam held the remedy. As unfallen covenant head, he could have refused the fruit, brought his wife before God, and stood in the breach. Scripture repeatedly shows God honoring the mediator who stands between judgment and a fallen people.
Instead, Adam chose solidarity in rebellion. He ate with open eyes, and when judgment arrived, he blamed both his wife and God, weaponizing the woman to excuse his own treason.
This failure demanded a Second Adam, and the reversal unfolds in another garden.
Where Adam stood upright in Eden and yielded to the enemy, Jesus fell to His face in Gethsemane, sweating blood in submission to the Father. Adam grasped at divinity from a forbidden tree; Christ surrendered His privileges, walking toward an execution stake on a barren hill.
Where Adam joined his bride in rebellion and abandoned her under trial, Christ encountered a bride already defiled and broke the cycle.
He did not join her in sin, but entered our condition in flawless obedience. Rather than pointing fingers in heaven's courtroom, He absorbed her sentence, bore the curse of the Law, and washed her in His blood to present her holy and blameless.
This is the engine of Romans 5, where the gift overpowers the trespass. Adam's failure unleashed the reign of death, but Christ's one righteous act absorbed millions of accumulated sins.
Returning us to fragile innocence would have been mercy enough, yet He clothed us in the righteousness of God. Death once reigned through one man, but those who receive grace now reign in life through Jesus Christ. Amen.
Karsten Schulz retweeted
В октябре 2026 года команда Anthropic проверила, насколько близко маленькие модели подошли к саморепликации на обычных домашних устройствах.
Они взяли дешёвые Android TV-боксы по ~55 долларов и запустили на пятнадцати штуках распределённую модель Gemma примерно на 26 миллиардов параметров. Она работала, но очень медленно — меньше половины токена в секунду. Отдельно показали, что модель около 9B уже умеет сама поднимать инференс на восьми из девяти разных типов железа.
В упрощённой сети с открытыми отладочными портами более сильная модель GLM-5.2 в большинстве попыток проходила полный цикл: находила узлы, получала выполнение кода, поднимала меньшую модель и шла дальше. Меньшие модели справляются с отдельными шагами, но пока часто ломаются, когда нужно связать всё вместе без ошибок.
Anthropic пишет, что если маленькие модели продолжат улучшаться с прежней скоростью, к концу 2026 года они могут выйти на уровень, при котором такой «вес-based» репликатор станет реалистичным. Он не будет стремительным, как классические черви (удвоение скорее за дни), но у него не будет одного центрального выключателя, и он сможет разбираться с незнакомыми устройствами на ходу.
Пока это контролируемые эксперименты и экстраполяция тренда, а не готовый автономный червь, который уже гуляет по роутерам и колонкам.
Но разрыв между «умеет отдельные шаги» и «надёжно делает весь цикл на слабом железе» сужается быстро. А большинство дешёвых IoT-устройств по-прежнему почти никто серьёзно не проверяет.
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Researchers proved AI has deleted every reason universities exist.
Harvard University ran a controlled experiment pitting a custom AI against their own top-tier classrooms.
And the results are going to collapse the higher education bubble.
They took 194 undergraduates and split them up.
One group learned physics in one of Harvard’s best hands-on, active-learning physical classrooms. Group work. Instructor support. The premium university experience.
The other group went home and learned the exact same material with an AI tutor.
The AI didn't just win. It embarrassed the institution.
Students using the AI learned more than twice as much as the students in the elite Harvard classroom.
They scored 30% higher on the final assessment.
And they did it in less time.
Let that sink in.
A piece of software sitting on a laptop outperformed a world-class faculty in one of the most elite learning environments on Earth.
Universities have always justified their exorbitant tuition with two things: access to elite knowledge and the physical classroom experience.
This study just proved both of those moats are gone.
When software can teach you complex physics twice as well as a $60,000-a-year institution, the math of higher education breaks permanently.
The AI didn't just give the students answers. It used strict pedagogical guardrails. It guided. It questioned. It forced the students to do the cognitive work.
It offered perfect, one-to-one tutoring, personalized to the exact moment a student misunderstood a concept.
That level of attention is mathematically impossible to scale in a physical lecture hall.
For a thousand years, the university was the only place to get a premium education.
Now, it’s the bottleneck.
If AI can double your learning speed for a fraction of the cost, what exactly are students taking on decades of debt to pay for?
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Parkinson’s Law – Why the State Bureaucracy Grows When the Work Shrinks
In 1955, a British naval historian wrote a joke for The Economist. Seventy years later, it remains one of the most accurate descriptions of the modern state ever written. Everyone knows the slogan: work expands to fill the time available. Almost no one knows the mechanism underneath it. That mechanism explains Europe.
1. The evidence. Between 1914 and 1928, the Royal Navy lost two thirds of its largest warships. Over the same years the Admiralty – the office that ran the ships – grew by three quarters. There were fewer ships and more men behind desks. Then there was the Colonial Office, which kept growing while the colonies left one by one. It was hiring while the empire was shrinking.
2. The first mechanism. An official who feels overworked has three choices. He can resign, he can share the work with a colleague, or he can ask for two subordinates. He never chooses the colleague, because a colleague is a rival. Two subordinates are a rank. So one tired man becomes three. Then each of the two subordinates feels tired.
3. The second mechanism. Seven people now do what one did, and they keep each other busy with drafts, approvals, and comments on the approvals. Everyone works hard, and nothing is produced. You have been in this meeting. You have been copied on this email. You have watched three people sign the form that one person filled in.
4. The law of triviality. Parkinson noticed that a committee will approve a nuclear reactor in minutes, because nobody understands it. The same committee will debate the bicycle shed for an hour, because everybody does. Bureaucracy does not avoid the important question by accident. It avoids it by design – the small question carries no risk, and on the big one, someone’s name goes on the decision.
5. The ratchet. A business that fails closes. A department that fails gets a bigger budget, because the problem is now bigger. Failure is the bureaucracy’s best argument for itself. This is why the state never shrinks on its own: every problem it does not solve becomes a new office for solving it.
6. The civilizational lesson. Burnham described the managers taking over. Parkinson showed how they breed. Put the two together and you get Brussels. You get France, where the state spends more than half of everything the country produces and still cannot fix a hospital. This is not because the people inside are wicked. It is because the machine works exactly as Parkinson said it would.
7. The vindication. Parkinson was dismissed as a humorist. Then Milei cut Argentina’s ministries in half – and the country did not collapse. It barely noticed, except on the bill. The lesson is simple: you cannot reform a bureaucracy by asking it what to cut. It will always propose to cut the ships – and hire someone to manage the cut.
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Christian husbands:
Pray with your wife.
Read Scripture with her.
Listen to her.
Protect her.
Encourage her.
Repent when you sin against her.
Love her sacrificially.
Lead her toward Christ.
Ephesians 5:25 is a high calling.
Karsten Schulz retweeted
AfD 30,5 % – CDU 17,5 %
Brandmauer weg, oder das war’s für die CDU.
Die CDU ist eine Karrierepartei, genau so wie die SPD. Wer da nach oben kommen will, der studiert bereits das Richtige und tritt dort als Teenager ein.
Bei der SPD studiert man Geschwätzwissenschaften, bei der CDU Jura, BWL oder Politikwissenschaften. Dann arbeitet man vier Jahre als Rechtsanwalt o. Ä., damit die Presse die nächsten 50 Jahre behaupten kann, man wäre einer gewesen, und los geht die Parteikarriere.
Dort wird man dann von einem Pöstchen ins nächste gehievt, sodass man immer versorgt ist. Hier Stadtrat, dort Büroassistenz, da Landesgeschäftsstelle, dort stellvertretender Fraktionsführer, bis ein Platz frei ist, wo es richtig Kohle gibt, und dann wird die Ernte eingefahren.
Alles, was man dafür tun muss, ist, dem aktuellen Boss hinten reinzukriechen und nie ein schlechtes Wort über die Partei zu verlieren.
Und falls Sie sich je gefragt haben, warum die alle Merkel mitgemacht haben und den jetzt noch viel katastrophaleren Merz, der sich benimmt wie ein Kanzler, aber auf Temu bestellt, dann ist das Ihre Antwort.
Nur werden langsam die Pöstchen knapp. In Sachsen-Anhalt hat die CDU 25 Sitze verloren, in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 12 und bundesweit laut aktuellen Umfragen 68.
Und oh Mann, sind das Pöstchen!
Da kriegen sie in Landtagen zwischen 10.000 und 11.000 im Monat, BT bis 17.000. Büroausstattung für 6.000, dicke Rente ist garantiert.
Und von dem Geld gibt man sowieso kaum was aus.
Denn man kann erster Klasse Zug fahren und herumfliegen, so viel man will, und man residiert überall in den teuersten Hotels, futtert sich dick auf einem Bankett nach dem anderen oder am Kuchen in den Ausschusssitzungen, und die Kantinen sind natürlich subventioniert.
Zusätzlich wird man mit all dem Vorwissen, welche Gesetze kommen, der beste Aktienspekulant der Welt.
Weil das nicht reicht, kann man noch ein halbes Dutzend Leute über die Mitarbeiterpauschale mitdurchfüttern, und pro eine Million Wähler gibt es 1,24 Millionen Euro für die Partei, mit denen man noch mehr Leute für sehr wenig Arbeit bezahlen kann.
Tja, und jetzt sind da sehr viele CDUler, die sich darauf gefreut haben, in den nächsten Jahren zu leben wie einst der Hochadel, aber ihre Plätze an der Sonne bekommt jetzt ein AfDler!
Und bei 17,5 % dürfte es den meisten klar geworden sein, dass sich das auch nicht ändern wird, ganz egal, wie oft sie Russland, Putin oder Verbotsverfahren sagen.
Und wenn das noch länger so geht, gibt es bald gar keine Pöstchen mehr in der Partei zu verteilen, und all die schöne Mühe war umsonst. Das Pro-forma-Studium, die 500 totlangweiligen Parteisitzungen und das Merkel- und Merz-Geheuchel. Alles für nichts.
Also: Wie lang wird es noch dauern, bis der erste CDUler mit Rang und Namen aufsteht und die Brandmauer löscht?
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Accelerate…
@grok
Does your reasoning still conclude that Jesus Christ is the son of God and that he rose from the dead after being crucified by Pontius Pilate. That he ascended into heaven and exceeded at the right hand of God, the father that he will come again and glory to judge the living and the dead?
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Если думаете, что очень устаете на работе, вспомните про этого парня.
Так выглядит кинезин — молекулярный «курьер» внутри наших клеток, который ходит на «двух ножках», таскает белки, органеллы и другие клеточные компоненты.
Он буквально ходит по микротрубкам, работает 24/7 и
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Registrations for the Bebras Challenge USA have opened! 🎉
Sign up as a coordinator to let your students participate, all for free.
bebraschallenge.org/
Karsten Schulz retweeted
PREGUNTA PARA LOS ENEMIGOS DEL CAPITALISMO:
Si los individuos somos demasiado ignorantes, irracionales e incapaces de discernir qué es lo mejor para nuestras propias vidas como para dejarnos decidir libremente, y por eso necesitamos del Estado ¿en qué momento exacto un político, salido de esa misma masa de individuos ignorantes, irracionales e incapaces adquiere el conocimiento necesario para decidir por todos?
¿Qué clase de transformación epistémica ocurre al cruzar la puerta del Estado? ¿En qué momento el político deja de ser un ignorante que necesita ser dirigido y pasa a convertirse en un oráculo capaz de conocer millones de las preferencias, circunstancias y necesidades contextuales de cada ser humano que gobierna?
¿Qué proceso lógico nos lleva de “el individuo no sabe qué le conviene” a “el político sí sabe qué les conviene a todos”?
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Since the 1980s, the Sahara has shrunk by roughly 8%. Satellite data show widespread greening, a pattern that is playing out across the planet.
Around 50% of Earth's vegetated land has become significantly greener, an area roughly three times the size of the United States.
The dominant driver is not rainfall or land use change, it is rising atmospheric CO2. Higher CO2 lets plants photosynthesize more efficiently, they lose less water, they tolerate heat and dryness better.
The effect is strongest along desert margins - across the Sahel, the Middle East, Australia's interior and the southern edge of the Sahara.
Rising CO2 is making the deserts, and the planet as a whole, greener.
Karsten Schulz retweeted
Almost all the reinforced concrete foundations of wind turbines ever built — weighing up to a thousand tonnes each — could be left in the ground.
The concrete may be mostly inert, but over the decades, these blocks can disrupt deep-soil hydrology and remain as permanent industrial junk below the surface of rural landscapes.
The concrete base of a typical early 2-3 MW wind turbine weighs 400 to 800 tonnes. But the foundations of the even bigger, more recent turbines (5 MW+) can exceed 1,000 tonnes.
The number reaching the end of their working lives could soon surpass the tens of thousands. As they degrade, they also risk leaking gearbox fluids, hydraulic liquids, and synthetic lubricants into the soil. In many jurisdictions, decommissioning regulations only require the operator to clear the foundation to a depth of 1 meter below the surface. While contracts state operators are responsible, the financial reality is complex.
Bank guarantees or bonds set aside for removal (around $100,000 per turbine) are woefully inadequate. Real-world estimates for total removal and site restoration can exceed $200,000 to $400,000 per unit.
If the cost of total removal vastly exceeds the bond, there is a strong incentive for shell companies to declare bankruptcy — leaving landowners to foot the bill.
We are already seeing this play out at Victoria's Codrington wind farm. Operators announced plans to remove only the top 1.5-meter pedestal, leaving the bulk of the project's 20,000 tonnes of subterranean foundations permanently buried.
This triggered an intense backlash from local communities and MPs who argue it violates the original promise to restore the land.
No one wants to deal with these massive concrete and steel monoliths once the turbines are decommissioned.
