Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth) header
Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth) profile picture

Co-Founder https://xitter.gq/t.co/aEe4MCf2TF

Mumbai, India
Joined January 2021
Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)Photo by Krishang Sheth (@krishang_sheth)
Krishang Sheth retweeted
Opening access for developers to build Muse connectors. You bring the API -- Muse brings the agent, the browser, and the context of what the person actually wants. People reach your service just by asking for it, and their agent takes it from there. New connectors are live today. Come build with us. muse.ai/platform
1,061
881
760
11,724
6,089,973
Krishang Sheth retweeted
One 150 g hamburger has a water use footprint of approximately 2,400 L, equivalent to roughly 83,000 AI images. One cotton T-shirt has a water use footprint of approximately 2,720 L, equivalent to roughly 94,000 AI images. One hour of Netflix, including the TV, router and network, is roughly 1.9 L which is the equivalent of 65 AI images. This includes training + inference. Comparing the same types of water btw so apples to apples. US golf course irrigation costs 10-18x the water requirements of all data centers in America. Paper mill production water use is 2-3x of all AI data centers in the US.
i have nothing but respect for whoever created the AI datacenter water psyop it must have required an enormous amount of planning to trick that many, often smart, people into believing water is an actual issue - absolute peak social engineering chess
66
135
17
1,441
98,284
Krishang Sheth retweeted
This belongs to all of us.
6,841
111,095
11,684
319,874
14,055,943
Krishang Sheth retweeted
The businesses getting the most out of AI right now aren't tech companies. They’re plumbers, agency owners, dentists, Etsy sellers. New data from @OpenAI (cc @RonnieChatterji) makes the pattern clear: tech startups account for about 5% of ~active~ U.S. users doing entrepreneurial work with ChatGPT. The other 95% are spread across services, retail, healthcare, and trades. AI adoption for entrepreneurship isn’t concentrated in tech. It’s happening inside everyday businesses, folding into routine work that used to be slower or outsourced or entirely overlooked.
52
95
40
531
240,198
I have changed my mind on how AI will impact jobs in America. Previously, I believed AI would replace many entry level roles typically filled by young employees. The technology would then work its way up the organization and eventually reduce the total number of jobs in a company. The data is saying something different, so when I get new information I am willing to change my mind. The number of software engineers being hired has been increasing. The number of open software engineer roles is growing. The number of new college grads who get hired has increased 5.6% over the last 12 months. The unemployment level for people aged 20-24 years old who have a college degree has fallen from nearly 9% to almost 5% as well. The Wall Street Journal recently wrote “AI created 640,000 jobs between 2023 and 2025 in the U.S., according to an analysis by LinkedIn of job posting data, including new white-collar positions such as Head of AI and AI engineer.” And I am starting to see companies throughout our portfolio aggressively hiring to keep up with the demand for their products and services. If AI can make employees more productive, which is widely accepted as fact, then companies are going to want as many productive units of labor as possible. This is a key reason why I am changing my mind. AI appears to be a magical technology that will make companies more productive and more profitable. The net result will be more corporations, more startups, and more jobs. All three are big, positive wins for the American economy.
776
655
241
6,527
2,042,631
This is exactly what we have been betting on @EnablSystems for the past few months. We have already worked with real estate brokerages and marketing agencies in India. And we found out pretty quickly just how fragmented the data is. I’ll be sharing more about our findings.
If you read this and don’t understand why it’s happening it’s an opportunity to reset your understanding of how the real world works. The real world will need a ton of help actually getting agents going in the enterprise. Companies have legacy tech stacks they need to modernize, data in tons of fragmented tools, knowledge that isn’t captured or digitized, and change management needed to actually utilize agents effectively. And they have to do all this while still running their business day-to-day, unlike startups. This is why there is so much opportunity for companies (software or services) to actually deploy agents in specific domains and workflows. This remains a big opportunity for both existing services providers but also tons of new startups as well. Every new technology wave produces a new era of consulting firms that can deliver on that technology. It’s also why the FDE model is going to be alive and well for a long time because companies will want to have their vendor actually help drive the change management and implementation for their new workflows. The people aren’t going away. Far from it.
48
Krishang Sheth retweeted
This is the future we are building at 8090. Our Software Factory is giving the companies that adopt it a new way to think about software. Build v buy was never as simple as it sounded. If you build you have complex maintenance issues. If you buy, you also generally double or triple your budget with services. The new way is to focus on the business logic and have Software Factory create something bespoke. Fits like a glove, highly tuned for you, low maintenance costs. Try it here: 8090.ai
$8M/year to a vendor who couldn't explain their own system. $21M saved in four years after replacing it with a purpose-built application. the client owns the business logic. we own the technology. every requirement captured in plain english before a single line of code was written. the pattern repeats across healthcare, insurance, manufacturing. the maintenance era is ending.
30
11
1
273
123,641
Krishang Sheth retweeted
Sequoia's thesis that the next $1T company will sell work, not software, is the most important reframe in AI right now. The argument: if you sell a copilot, you're competing with every new model release. But if you sell the outcome — books closed, contracts reviewed, claims handled — every AI improvement makes your margins better, not your product obsolete. The key insight most people miss: for every $1 spent on software, ~$6 is spent on services. The entire SaaS playbook was about capturing the software dollar. The AI playbook is about capturing the services dollar — at software margins. Not "AI for accountants." The AI accounting firm. Not "AI for lawyers." The AI law firm. The companies that figure this out won't look like SaaS companies. They'll look like services firms rebuilt on software infrastructure. That's a fundamentally different company to build, fund, and scale. And most founders are still building copilots.
227
525
202
5,547
2,147,022
Krishang Sheth retweeted
Our run-rate revenue has surpassed $30 billion, up from $9 billion at the end of 2025, as demand for Claude continues to accelerate. This partnership gives us the compute to keep pace. Read more: anthropic.com/news/google-br…
309
670
698
7,742
6,110,860
Krishang Sheth retweeted
I'm calling it. AGI is already here – it's just not evenly distributed yet.
1,558
1,138
627
13,514
2,619,986
Why am I hitting my Claude usage limits so fast all of a sudden?? p.s. I have the pro plan
1
31
Your feed is either making you sharper or keeping you stuck. Who would you add? Follow @krishang_sheth for more on building with AI.
1
6