Thoughts on the upcoming Elysium launch: As an absolute $HYPE maxi over an extended timeframe, it recently became clear that (in what is the most ironic possible outcome) CT's obsession with a cashflow/security valuation framework has become self-defeating. Since the conception of the cryptoeconomy, the dominating valuation framework has rested on some ill-defined network metrics (e.g., metcalfe's law) while cashflow was reserved as very much secondary, or non-existent. In the meantime, the vast majority of crypto participants were actively fighting the security status of cryptoassets while under fire from the Gensler-era SEC, which suggested the cashflow/DCF-style modeling as erroneous, and decisively so when the SEC determined cryptoassets as emphatically NOT securities. What's surprising about the canonical hype valuation framework is that it flies in the face of everything this space fought so hard to overcome, and very specifically effects arguably the best product to ever emerge from the cryptoeconomy. I think that it's because the mind virus around cashflow has muddied the fact that hyperliquid is not a security, and in fact contains exactly the network features that ETH, SOL, ZEC, etcetera, possess, and from which their fair market valuations profit tremendously (and appropriately). So back to @Kinetiq_xyz and @Enter_Elysium: if scaling the network component of hyperliquid can make more obvious this trait of hyperliquid, then the first thing that happens is that the network effects and corresponding fair market value explode, as we've seen in the past. On top of that, if the bottom line is accretive to hyperliquid, then not only does hype gain from the network effect/speculative premium, but also a genuine economic force supporting the ecosystem. That could be huge.