Mister Tee (@meeyatariq) profile picture
Joined August 2012
Photo by Mister Tee (@meeyatariq)Photo by Mister Tee (@meeyatariq)Photo by Mister Tee (@meeyatariq)Photo by Mister Tee (@meeyatariq)Photo by Mister Tee (@meeyatariq)
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @RChristina421
If anyone can get my Tokens back i am willing to give them a percentage, but they all want a few hundred dollars for gas fees etc
1
1
1
1
71
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @RChristina421
Hi I don't think it is possible to get the Tokens back. There are allot of people on X here claiming they can recover the assets, but i don't think so . Why has Binance not been able to retrieve the tokens that were hacked.
2
1
1
2
81
Mister Tee retweeted
Hi can someone help me . A person pretending to be support on Near server Discord just drained my Trust Wallet. Is it possible to trace them
56
8
13
51
11,986
Mister Tee retweeted
Imagine an open source order book exchange, updated by the world's safest and most proven DAO, that's 100% onchain (i.e. actually), providing a ledger of every transaction that has taken place #MULTIDEX protos.com/what-happened-to-…
126
175
12
772
47,484
Mister Tee retweeted
The lives of Trezor owners are now at risk. Crooks can now turn up at their houses to try and extort assets from them, as per protos.com/two-sentenced-in-… This is why ICP introduced Internet Identity 5 years ago. Passkeys = *decentralized* security. coindesk.com/tech/2026/08/13…
38
158
10
621
28,000
Mister Tee retweeted
I would be your worst nightmare; if you blocked me on an account, I would have 100 with the people you scammed in the USA.
1
1
1
50
Mister Tee retweeted
Another scammer
1
22
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @fluffycrypt
Stay away. This is a scam
1
9
Mister Tee retweeted
Another Scammer @whale_guru559
1
1
184
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @AlphaLabx
"Finally it's time to launch my own memecoin" You launch memecoins like you are shelling peas. Scammers
1
2
27
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @XiLeeTrades
You scammer
1
7
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @AlphaLabx
Scam
1
8
Mister Tee retweeted
Replying to @6az___
It's a scam don't believe me he still doesn't answer my messages
1
1
3
615
Mister Tee retweeted
Multi/DEX just took its first real step toward becoming $ICP's answer to Hyperliquid @geniexbtz and I break down why an airdrop might be on the table From Dominic Williams' new trading contest to a full tokenomics comparison against $HYPE and $LIT This episode makes the case for why Multi/DEX could become one of the biggest events in #ICP's history
6
19
101
2,300
Mister Tee retweeted
I'm surprised I'm writing this ⭐️⭐️⭐️ I too genuinely care about the future of $ICP POST: Please give "these" "good" projects recognition Obviously the post below reveals general frustration from the comments (not always a bad thing) but as always ... all frustration get directed towards DFINITY DFINITY can’t make anyone successful. Project-market fit is required + no bear market helps Out of their control. and if they do "recognize" a projects will it make that projects successful? will the pat on the back ... burn more tokens? will the "good job" bring in more liquidity? and if that project fails? ...will you also say ... they promoted a scam projects? ...when 95% of projects fail is real life ...so 1. its actually not trivial as you may think 2. they will get hate either way 3. they don't actually have infinite resources We are treating DFINITY like a mother/father figure, ... a centralized network that should give out gold stars to every "good" project out ... by what standard? ... is the project DEAD really up there with Liquidium? are we forgetting ... we should be treating ICP as a network APPROACHING a decentralized system ... maybe ... handholding and gold stars were more plenty 3-5 years ago ... and as the network matures gold stars will only reduce ... to only those projects that actually support the network growth to a high capacity or have high potential to ... which again, a lot of it is guess work and a lot of those projects don't actually need a gold start cuz the community can give out plenty ... if none at all DFINITY themselves are in survival mode ! they haven't even "made it" yet DFINITY REALLY ONLY cares about: 1. 📉 Reduce inflation 2. 🔥 Increase burn (or potential) 3. 💧 Bring more liquidity (or potential) a spectacular project can still succeed ... (project becomes self sustaining) without a gold star from DFINITY ... and sometimes it can fail! people don't realize how much of this is guess work and DFINITY will not always get it right I don't agree with EVERYTHING they are doing. ... but those things are usually trivial compared to the general good they are doing. I hope one day DFINITY will stop giving out gold stars altogether ... and those projects will too succeed
I’m writing this out of frustration because I genuinely care about the future of the $ICP ecosystem. Hey @dominic_w @PierreSamaties, You often talk about attracting builders and growing the ecosystem, but where is the support for the people who are actually building? I'm not even talking about grants. Forget the money. Recognition is free. A simple repost, a mention, or highlighting projects that are grinding day and night would mean a lot. Instead, it feels like only a handful of already well-funded projects keep getting the spotlight while dozens of passionate builders are completely ignored. I have zero hate towards projects like Oisy or Liquidium. They're building great products and deserve success. But why is almost all the attention concentrated on the same few teams? Meanwhile, there are builders who chose ICP despite knowing they'll probably never receive a grant or even a single mention from the foundation. Projects like: @meneseprotocol @PartyhatsICP @ohshiilabs @dvinity_icp @clownitx @icpixeleditor @ICSpicyRWA @The_Swop @T3kNoLogicMusic @DEAD_ICP ...and many more (sorry if I missed anyone). These teams are building because they believe in $icp - not because they're getting funding. Yet they rarely get any recognition. The frustrating part is that we've already seen several heavily supported projects fail the community or simply extract value. We've watched projects lose momentum, abandon users, or disappoint after receiving significant backing. Meanwhile, the builders who continue showing up every single day get ignored. How does that make sense? Look at ecosystems like Solana or even Robinhood Chain. One thing they do exceptionally well is supporting their builders. They amplify them, celebrate them, and help them grow. That creates momentum, attracts developers, and brings new users. That's how ecosystems expand. ICP has incredible technology. I genuinely believe that. But technology alone doesn't build an ecosystem. People do. Builders do. Communities do. For the past couple of years, it feels like we've struggled to attract meaningful new users or liquidity while many existing builders and community members have simply left. Price action reflects sentiment, and sentiment reflects how people feel about the ecosystem. Please stop acting like everything is fine. Instead of pushing only the same 2-3 projects or constantly shifting focus to the next narrative, spend some time highlighting the builders who are quietly creating value every day. Many of them aren't asking for grants. They aren't asking for millions. They're asking for something much smaller. Recognition. Because sometimes one post from the official ICP accounts can do more for a small builder than months of marketing they can't afford. If these builders succeed entirely on their own after being ignored, don't show up later to claim them as $ICP success stories. Support them while they're building. That's how you create a thriving ecosystem.
4
2
37
1,709
Clocks ticking , ICP.
9
11
2
103
5,884
Mister Tee retweeted
$ICP friends, this is not by any means a bearish post, but rather a common sense question. Poked raises a great point. I used Claude Code + ICP Skills for a few months to develop applications on ICP as a non-developer. The process is very straight forward, and it costs infinitely less than buying Caffeine credits. Would argue that you can build a simple application with the $20/month Claude subscription, not to mention the $100/month that I personally had and not once I hit the limit. So the real question is, why does Caffeine exist in the first place? As far as I know, it also uses Claude under the hood, it's just a worse version of it, full of bugs, that burns through your limited credits for absolutely no reason. Sure, you could argue that it's still in its infancy, etc. But again, why would anyone use a worse version of Claude Code that also uses Claude under the hood when you can go straight to the source? If I'm missing something, please let me know.
lol supported ICP for years, spent loads of personal funds creating projects, held till it fell to nothing to help the project now I try to use Caffiene but must purchase loads of credits just to experiment. Its a joke.
26
6
78
7,620
$ICP Signal ♾🚨: Amazon. Google. Microsoft. You think they run the internet. They don't. "Internet" is literally short for internetworking. A network of networks. Over 80,000 of them. No company owns it. No company can shut it off. AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure all just sit on top of that same layer. That layer was never built to run anything. Only to coordinate. Until now. ICP lets full applications run directly on that public layer. No private cloud required. OpenChat has been doing exactly this for years, live. This one started as a great question from a fellow ICP creator, @BobbyO_ See the signal♾🚨 Link in comments
5
47
2
182
4,228
Mister Tee retweeted
To those tards who say "who cares ... bro it does not need to be ON-chain" To those tards who say our app is "on-chain" our AI is "on-chain" I guess your assets needs to be taken or paused before you start carring $ICP World Computer
So... Lazarus stole $1,500,000,000 from Bybit by hacking the Safe{Wallet} web experience, which was hosted on *cloud,* rather than served by smart contracts (just as I predicted). Our industry was crashed UNNECESSARILY. We must demand FAKE "onchain" ends TODAY.
2
17
660
Cloud Engines will be ICP’s biggest catalyst.
7
6
92
2,384