Crypto nerd. Formerly OpenZeppelin, Augur, OpenBazaar, Flashbots.

Joined August 2019
onewayfunction retweeted
So either the current or next generation of models is the last time the general public will ever get access to the frontier from the US labs, right?
4
1
18
2,125
onewayfunction retweeted
Omg
More private keys by the Indian certificate authority have been discovered. These are all small numbers. People are suspecting that they interpreted 384 bit keys to mean that they should pick numbers from 1-384 to use as their private keys.
3
1
37
5,160
onewayfunction retweeted
43
2,363
75
30,686
281,729
onewayfunction retweeted
Replying to @valkenburgh
I think that’s a very rude way to refer to AT&T’s core network.
1
3
37
974
onewayfunction retweeted
Well, this is the interesting part now.
17
25
3
387
25,119
onewayfunction retweeted
Hugely important point
a16z crypto's Eddy Lazzarin and Stanford's Dan Boneh on how AI's math leap could turn a decade of trust-building in cryptography into one month: Eddy: "We specifically rely in some sense on time... We put these schemes out and we wait. And we wait because what we believe is happening is that experts, like cryptographers and mathematicians, are testing and trying to break these things." "Because of the pace of progress on AI's mathematical abilities, there is a conspicuous absence of time... A whole new well of cognitive ability to scrutinize has appeared." Dan: "In the past, when someone would make an assumption and build a system based on it, we'd have to wait like 10 years before that system could be deployed." "Now we can just let a model run for a month, try to break it, and if the model can't break it, boy, do we have a lot of confidence that the assumption is valid." Eddy: "The labs can say, 'We took our tip-top, totally unrestricted, most cyber-capable model, and we told it to go absolutely insane, and we spent $20 million, $50 million trying to break this scheme.'" "We actually have the prospect to have more confidence in our security than ever before." @eddylazzarin @danboneh
3
17
2,027
onewayfunction retweeted
Elon bought 140 characters and delivered flying cars. The future has arrived
Elon Musk
@elonmuskOct 16
2
2
124
onewayfunction retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
Me on my way to work tmr
305
614
51
34,056
951,614
I think Anthropic play here is: 1. Force western labs to keep frontier models private, gaining RSI cycles advantage and making it harder for China to catch up by distilling. 2. Heavily restrict open weights models as "unsafe".
1
2
6
524
onewayfunction retweeted
This is what I have been telling everyone who will listen. The most valuable thing the frontier labs can now do for crypto (and math more broadly) is publish their *negative* results. What ideas they tried, how much compute they used, and what obstacles they found.
Replying to @matthew_d_green
And specifically for cryptanalysts who are working with models and for the labs: Folks, what we need right now are *negative* results. Silence is the worst thing you could be publishing.
8
35
1
222
10,260
onewayfunction retweeted
Presenting: "Small, But Not Zero" An opera explaining the integer multiplication math journey up to this point.
Validated and merged Rohan's PR. Big gain on a really difficult regime (that frankly I was stuck at). Incredible work. κ = 2⁻¹⁵ (tightened from κ = 2⁻¹⁸²) A 500 thousand fold improvement over the previous result and a 2 ^ 167 fold improvement over the original OpenAI result. This result was a true community effort that combined techniques from a number of contributors. I want to take time to highlight each of them, but for now getting these results verified and published as fast as possible so everyone working on the problem is at the leading edge.
17
25
5
209
15,043
onewayfunction retweeted
Should we hold an AI cryptographic competition? In the event that AI breaks crypto --- something we have no evidence for other than folks who don't know what they are talking about trying to sell you something or make it about them --- can AI make new cryptography? Can AI make new assumptions, hash functions, or symmetric ciphers?
12
9
49
3,361
onewayfunction retweeted
"Mathematicians did not ask for this work to be done" might become one of the historical quotes from this era, perfectly depicting the downfall of academia
142
926
88
14,510
257,473
onewayfunction retweeted
I’ve had a few people write to ask me to follow up on a (reply!) tweet I wrote that’s gotten a lot of retweets. I considered deleting it just to avoid the headache, but I think that would make people more paranoid. So let me share my thoughts.
Replying to @kmad @matthew_pines
I think we might lose public key cryptography.
48
300
36
1,911
268,504
onewayfunction retweeted
34
308
14
3,083
42,428
onewayfunction retweeted
Ask the clanker to builder stronger cryptography protocols if it's so smart
1
1
3
142
onewayfunction retweeted
Naval
@navalOct 8
Turns out the “Open” part refers to *your* code.
What’s happening in the AI-powered reverse engineering and decompilation is absolutely insane. Pretty soon all software will be de facto open-source. AI is coming for everything and everyone.
214
130
20
2,737
462,313
onewayfunction retweeted
omg, Anthropic. You suck. And because of paternalism, which is the specifically most annoying kind of suck. I can't wait until another company makes a better AI than Claude. But, yeah, Claude is currently the best. :-{
19
9
2
160
14,347
Software is a speech. Computers are a press. Networks are assembly. Data is papers. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
4
15
1
61
2,364