I believe ETH will eventually replace BTC as crypto’s primary store of value. And Bitcoin’s future may look a lot more like DOGE than people want to admit.
Look at Dogecoin. Its market value and cultural influence have survived, but its underlying network has become increasingly marginal. Today, it has fewer than 500 publicly reachable nodes. In 2024, a single old laptop exploited an unpatched vulnerability and crashed 69% of its publicly visible nodes.
DOGE didn’t die. Its price, community and meme survived. Its mining security now largely depends on merged mining with Litecoin. That’s the fascinating part: a cryptocurrency can remain valuable even as its own network becomes less economically relevant.
Bitcoin is obviously much stronger today. But I’m looking at the next 10 or 20 years, not today.
Stablecoins, RWAs, lending, financial markets, digital art and countless other assets are building an increasingly substantial economy on Ethereum. Even BTC needs to become wrapped BTC to participate in much of that economy.
I believe the most important store of value in crypto will eventually be the native asset of the network that holds the most economic value, not necessarily the coin that came first.
That’s why I agree with Vitalik’s focus on ETH as a store of value. Ethereum doesn’t need to maximize fee burns. It needs to become indispensable.
BTC may survive as digital gold, or eventually as a giant meme. ETH has a chance to become the reserve asset of an entire onchain economy.
Expanding on why I believe "ETH as store of value (SoV)" makes much more sense to focus on than "ETH as fee-burning token".
Three primary reasons:
1. ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed
2. Optimizing for ETH as fee-burning token would demand Ethereum and ETH function in ways that are very hard to make compatible with decentralization and capture resistance.
3. Meanwhile, optimizing for ETH as SoV is aligned with Ethereum focusing on its unique strengths (decentralization and CROPS)
EIP-1559 (including its burn) is fine and good, we should keep them. But we should not feel sad if fee burn is < 10% of breakeven indefinitely; the value of ETH comes from elsewhere.
The core idea: the big thing that people appreciate about Ethereum is decentralization and CROPS. The main pragmatic benefit that these things translate into is stability. SoV is the category where that is not an unneeded extra we merely put effort into for ideological reasons, but rather a pragmatic strength from the perspective of people putting in their assets. And in the era of AI disruption, stability will be highly valued.
Jay retweeted
easiest CT alpha i can give yall for this cycle is bid when ppl are calling me a scammer and start taking profit when ppl are calling me the black jesus christ
Jay retweeted
This is absolute insanity. One month of Callout rewards. Where do you guys think this money is coming from?
Jay retweeted
Binance will be "hacked"...
2026 or 2027.
There is no bottom in the market until Binance is hacked.
It's part of the script.
Jay retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk @HuaweiMate6
Elon, have a lot of respect for you, but bad time to troll. Please stop.
Our SPCX shares (from our $500m investment in your Twitter takeover) are worth more than a billion.
Would appreciate if you show a little support. Thanks!
Jay retweeted
this $200m USDT top-up looks like just a regularly scheduled top-up from Binance 124->Binance 14? seems to happen when wallet goes below $200m.
txns below.
Jay retweeted
User funds are safe!
It does look like a hack on Binance. Appreciate the quick freeze from Tether (~$971m) and Circle (~$823m).
I don't manage Binance (.com) anymore, but as a shareholder, I expect all user funds will be fully covered.























