Andreas Holmsen-Ringstad

The crux of the matter is simple: Sir Ratcliffe chose Wilcox over Ashworth; the choice was a mistake; time to recognize that and start over. Based on relevant reports, what Dan Ashworth excels at is structure and organization-building, much more so than being able to identify a talented player or the right build up tactic. His previous work, at Brighton especially, seems to prove this point. Ashworth builds so that the organization can thrive as a whole, rather than being the key problem-solver of every process. There were reports of SJR being displeased that Ashworth was unable to immediately provide him with a list of names for possible vacancies, in the squad and on the banch. Wilcox, on the other hand, prides himself on having an excellent eye for talents and wishing to do the tactical and coaching work instead of the head coach. Two very different profiles, before even getting to the topics of their respective experience and competence. In short, an owner like SJR obviously wanted a yes-man and alleged specialist who wouldn’t mind the owner getting very involved, distrupting the regular hierarchy and authority. Having a seasoned executive who was all about structure and process rather seems like the exact opposite of what Ratcliffe truly wanted: control and ability to meddle at will. But what United need, more than anything, is structure with a host of competent executives rather than a self-proclaimed miracle worker who will mostly work to appease the boss.