Seb (@sebconverted) header
Seb (@sebconverted) profile picture

I mainly use Instagram & YouTube

Joined April 2022
Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)Photo by Seb (@sebconverted)
Seb retweeted
Replying to @sebconverted
It finally makes sense! This is why he wants to ban Islamic education for women.
2
3
119
1,684
Seb retweeted
Al-Hafiz al-Dhahabi's book Mu'jam al-Shuyukh includes 102 women that he personally took knowledge from. Just by skimming it, you realize that women seven centuries ago participated in hadith culture, preservation, and its transmission, in both famous works and obscure ones.
20
44
284
7,172
Keeping you all updated on these Christian apologists straight up grifting. Michael Jones AKA Inspiring Philosophy locked in $278K back in July 2026 talking about he needed to bounce for his safety cause Muslims were doxxing him. Fast forward 4 months and this dude has completely ghosted his donors. Zero updates. No receipts. Nothing about where the bag went or how he spent that stack. Just radio silence. Meanwhile the only thing we do know is he leveled up his studio and looks fresher than ever.
47
10
3
63
6,169
The Qur’an takes one of Jesus’ most important sayings and turns it against later Christology Zishan Ghaffar notes that the Qur’an takes Jesus’ declaration — “God is my Lord and your Lord” — and deliberately turns it into a universal formula of prophetic speech. The same theological pattern is placed on the lips of Hud, Moses and Muhammad ﷺ. The Quran is showing intimate knowledge of the Gospel of John and is reworking Jesus’ words into a typology of prophethood.
3
9
115
3,422
i held my mom in my arms, kissed her forehead and recited the shahadah. she repeated it after me before she took her final breath. a moment i'll carry with me forever.
23
63
3
1,549
13,144
In this video i show how Professor Gabriel Reynolds Miscites his sources, blunders and forced a biased viewpoint onto the Quran to reinforce an idea that is abundantly false (the Quran being a product of mere oral culture) youtu.be/G2GS0paqEdA?si=Q9lY… Make sure you like, hype and share the video!^ Also if you wanna see a second part let me know in the comments where i can refute more supposed pauline intertexts in Quran and Hadith there are only so many left after this video
🤖 Made with AI
4
5
2
58
2,350
Dr Ali Ataie’s magnum opus has arrived! The Uncrucified Christ is essential reading for every Muslim engaged in Christian–Muslim dialogue and debate. A landmark contribution to the historical study of Jesus of Nazareth.
55
240
17
1,328
46,269
Pt1 If Wisdom 2 is a Prophecy of Jesus, then Jesus is raised to heaven alive as it teaches in Wisdom 2&4. 4:10 uses the same language of how Enoch was raised in the lxx to make an Enohic connection. And said person is taken up and no longer visible. 12+ other traditions match it.
The 66 book Protestant Canon was compiled by Pharisees and rabbis who rejected Christ and wanted to get away from the Christian Church's canon. Those "extra books" are the true Christian Canon that the Apostles believed. Wisdom 2:12-22 is a prophecy of Jesus. OF COURSE they didn't want this in there!
4
1
30
1,055
Seb retweeted
You will be rewarded in the afterlife for feeding animals and birds.
13
323
7
2,756
41,701
Seb retweeted
Orthodox Muslim Reacts to Rabbi Shmuley Claiming He Debated With God and He will Forgive GOD 😭💀
17
29
1
327
13,757
Claiming that Moses taught the Trinity is a greater historical anachronism than claiming the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ used WhatsApp.
(INTENSE) @GodLogic_GL Apologetics Vs Dr. Javad Hashmi on if Any Jews Believed in the Trinity
24
32
6
320
10,498
Seb retweeted
Why is this still your pinned tweet?
“The wicked flee when no one pursues, but the righteous are bold as a lion.” - Proverbs 28:1
2
13
344
Seb retweeted
なんでクルアーンがアラビア語なのかやっと理解できた
6
1
4
101
38,193
Replying to @lucamarcelino
It’s not an account of Jesus rising from the dead, it’s just a misleading repackaging of Josephus’ testimonium flavianum.
8
15
2
332
6,376
Replying to @serrrated
I'd only being joining him in heaven as we're both Muslim.
1
1
28
641
You realize they’re removing people from Republican rallies for wearing hats that say “America First,” right?
374
1,121
90
8,090
391,577
How do you know these aren’t modalists? Or Subordinationist? Or that they merely believe the spirit is a power not a person? Or that they believe the Son and Spirit are co eternal?
Clear evidence of Trinitarian worship before 325AD. Yeah Inn Kathir is wrong, wrong, wrong...
12
2
97
3,491
Seb retweeted
🔹Does the Qur'an make a mistake in its two retellings of the good news of Yahya?🔹 An analysis by Dr Fadel Samarrai ... 🧵
✅ Challenge accepted. The Quran, considered “perfect, divine, and free of contradictions” by Muslims, is nevertheless a contradictory work containing glaring human errors. Here is just ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE (which, incidentally, involves no fewer than three contradictions!), a more in-depth analysis of which can be found in my book 100 Contradictions and Scientific Errors in the Quran. In the Quran, Allah sometimes recounts the same historical event twice, in two different surahs, as when He describes, in two different places in the Quran (Surah 3 and Surah 19), the moment when He has His angels announce to Zechariah that he will have a son: John. However, the human author hiding behind Allah's pen made the mistake, in each of these two surahs, of describing this event using verbatim quotations, that is, dialogues, and more specifically, statements made in the first person. Indeed, a perfect God who knows everything—and therefore knows the exact words spoken during a specific historical event—should not present TWO CONTRADICTORY VERSIONS OF ONE AND THE SAME FIRST-PERSON STATEMENT, which He should quote identically whenever He reproduces it in different surahs of the Quran. So, what did Zechariah reply when Allah conveyed to him the announcement of John's birth? According to verse 40 of Surah 3, Allah states that Zechariah, surprised, replied: “My Lord, how will I have a boy when I have reached old age and my wife is barren?” Yet, in verse 8 of Surah 19, Allah states that Zechariah, at that very same moment, said: “My Lord, how will I have a boy when my wife is barren and I have reached extreme old age?” These two Quranic quotations, from Surahs 3 and 19, supposedly reproduce the same words spoken by Zechariah during one single, specific historical event. They should therefore have been identical, word for word. Yet these two quotations reverse the order of the two arguments, while also differing by an adjective that appears in one version but is absent from the other. You must answer these three simple and binary questions to demonstrate that Allah does not contradict Himself in the Quran: ➜ 1. When Zechariah, surprised by the announcement Allah had conveyed to him, replied, did he say “I have reached old age” or “I have reached EXTREME old age”? ➜ 2. And did Zechariah mention his old age BEFORE or AFTER mentioning his wife's barrenness? The factual and historical account presented in Surah 3 contradicts and invalidates the one presented in Surah 19, even though both are supposedly equally divine and truthful. Furthermore, what answer did Zechariah receive to his request? Here again, there is a contradiction! The divine response that follows is not quite the same in the two accounts. For while, in verse 41 of Surah 3, Allah indicates that the response begins with “Your sign is that you will not be able to speak to the people for three days” (أَيَّامٍ / ayyāmin), the version of the beginning of the response in verse 10 of Surah 19 is “Your sign is that you will not be able to speak to the people for three nights” (لَيَالٍ / layālin). Did Allah therefore have two different recollections of the dialogue with Zechariah recorded in Surahs 3 and 19 of the Quran? ➜ 3. So which was the correct expression addressed to Zechariah: “three days” or “three nights”? The issue is not whether “three days” and “three nights” are equivalent in duration. These are supposed to be verbatim quotations describing one and the same specific statement. We should therefore find exactly the same words in both versions, in Surah 3 and Surah 19. The human author of the Quran made the mistake of recounting the same historical event multiple times while including first-person dialogue. And I have found other contradictions of the same kind in the Quran: involving Moses, Abraham, Mary the mother of Jesus, and others. I analyze them all in the chapter of my book 100 Contradictions and Scientific Errors in the Quran devoted to narrative contradictions. Allah, who “neither errs nor forgets” (Surah 20, verse 52), should be capable of remembering His exact words, word for word, and therefore reproducing them word for word. Allah should not be imprecise or have two different recollections of the exact words He heard or spoke during one and the same event.
2
7
31
1,497
What’s the point of this?
1
11
147
1,374
He reached out to @mulimorthodoxy after that wonderful conversation and is ready to become a muslim This amazing may Allah ease his journey and make him a good believer
6
39
2
657
14,133