sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy) header
sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy) profile picture

partly cloudy with a chance of ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

mighty Midwest
Joined September 2009
Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)Photo by sharpemcelroy (@sharpemcelroy)
Replying to @sharpemcelroy
And so, MAGA is not about greatness whatsoever, it is about ignorance: the luxury to ignore. It is about fantasy: the luxury to pursue a dream in which consequences of our actions do not exist; the luxury to pretend; the luxury to go back in time to
2
7
1
37
sharpemcelroy retweeted
I had no idea who this guy was 48 hours ago but this is some of the most impressive retail politics I've ever seen-- meeting voters literally where they are.
I walked the Trump rally line to listen, not make assumptions. I talked with voters, asked questions and heard what matters to them. When I'm elected, I'll represent all 82 counties and every Mississippian, no matter who they voted for. That's what being your senator means. #MississippiMatters
3
30
1
707
17,415
sharpemcelroy retweeted
No. I was a normie centrist Republican. All of us left. You are a MAGA apologist who is realizing you made a serious mistake.
Hell of a night to be a normie centrist Republican.
320
1,820
46
19,854
300,380
sharpemcelroy retweeted
No wake-up call can be loud enough for these two: Schumer: "We'll see if [Trump] will actually change his ways and join.” Jeffries: “The American people don’t want us to get even.”
60
658
48
4,952
49,033
sharpemcelroy retweeted
In an NBC News poll last week, Hakeem Jeffries had an approval rating of 18%, and Chuck Schumer's was 13%. It's wild seeing them both act like they have mandates to lead the party going forward.
212
4,918
168
32,982
321,119
sharpemcelroy retweeted
The more I think about this tweet, the more incredible it seems. JD Vance is really trying to save his political career by writing a little essay critiquing his own administration’s war strategy like he’s the public editor. Just terminally poster-brained.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
64
394
11
6,835
82,189
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Jeffries and Schumer bear responsibility for the astonishing passivity of Congressional Democrats in the last two years. They could have organized local and state resistance efforts to rescue programs killed by DOGE and Trump, to keep scientific research alive, to organize universities, law firms, media, and corporations to resist Trump's intimidation. They could have held press conferences and posted videos every single day to call out Trump's corruption and present an alternative vision for the country. Chris Murphy did it, others did it. But not the leaders. We will have no presidential candidate for 18 months. The task of presenting a vision that will lead America back from the darkness will fall to these two men. I wish I felt more confident they are up to the task. nytimes.com/2026/11/04/us/po…
132
993
47
3,508
34,011
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Speaker Hakeem Jeffries.
41
5,839
20
86,774
861,754
sharpemcelroy retweeted
It’s like establishment democrats are addicted to losing and now they’re going through withdrawal looking for a fix
Jeffries: "I haven't had a single member of the House Democratic caucus talk to me about impeachment. We've been relentlessly focused on affordability and accountability."
59
811
10
9,442
93,083
sharpemcelroy retweeted
One reason you don't want to claim your candidate is "God's candidate" or your party is "God's party" is that when that candidate or party loses, it becomes really apparent how small you've made God in order to support your own political opinions and aspirations.
11
330
19
2,007
25,781
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Oh no Meghan, you don't get to pretend you weren't on the MAGA train. You go down with the ship.
Hell of a night to be a normie centrist Republican.
97
4,714
17
71,044
574,134
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Zohran Mamdani: “It’s not enough for us as Democrats to win power. We have to use that power to deliver change that Americans can feel in their wallets. When you look at these campaigns, if we want to speak about James Talarico, he campaigned on a vision for universal childcare. If you want to talk about Keisha Lance Bottoms, she campaigned on a vision of cutting red tape to build housing. If you want to talk about Jocelyn Benson, she campaigned on a moratorium for data centers. What I’m excited to see now is a recognition that the work is only just starting and this has to be delivered for working people across the country”
86
3,476
187
17,380
560,626
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Let's not forget how quickly the tech executives got on their knees and kissed up to Trump immediately after he was elected. No flip-flopping allowed, fellas! You made your bed. You loved being friends with the Trump admin. cnbc.com/2024/11/06/trump-20…
69
685
16
3,916
66,689
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Replying to @PatrickSvitek
This is not a listening to Hakeem Jeffries moment
3
28
762
11,614
He’s so out of touch. No, actually. It IS a partisan moment. This is a resounding fuck you to Trump and Republicans. Why are Democrats always rushing to appease Republicans, meanwhile when they win they immediately start talking about how their opposition is evil and should be killed.
Hakeem Jeffries: “This is not a partisan moment. This is a patriotic moment. This is not a blue moment or a red moment. It’s a red, white and blue moment because American has won tonight."
60
1,208
7
9,222
58,657
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Reminder that prosecuting insider trading, abuse of office, bribery, and securities fraud isn't "lawfare" — it's the law.
29
737
16
4,290
46,148
sharpemcelroy retweeted
We’re turning data centers into 35mm rep cinemas.
52
1,943
53
14,613
179,941
If you think helping people is expensive, wait until you calculate the cost of abandoning them. Emergency rooms, shelters, policing, courts, prisons, and the human cost of lives lost. Poverty is expensive. Homelessness is expensive. Neglect is expensive. Investing in people isn't just compassion, it's common sense. And sheesh, we're paying a fortune to keep doing the wrong thing.
38
223
15
723
10,721
sharpemcelroy retweeted
The cost of not doing UBI exceeds the cost of doing UBI.
If you think helping people is expensive, wait until you calculate the cost of abandoning them. Emergency rooms, shelters, policing, courts, prisons, and the human cost of lives lost. Poverty is expensive. Homelessness is expensive. Neglect is expensive. Investing in people isn't just compassion, it's common sense. And sheesh, we're paying a fortune to keep doing the wrong thing.
15
90
3
372
4,148
sharpemcelroy retweeted
Imagine if Elon's $500 million had been spent on education or healthcare. Or the arts. Anything.
9,201
10,823
845
73,167
2,942,737