The Truth Behind Prop Firms. News • Investigations • Payout Reports • Transparency
Joined July 2026
- Tweets971
- Following118
- Followers1K
- Likes3.2K
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 Payout Approved, Then Rejected: Trader Questions AquaFunded’s Decision
A trader @waleedbanks , has raised concerns about his payout experience with AquaFunded.
According to the trader :
• AquaFunded’s risk team reportedly reviewed his trades and informed him of a $1,046 deduction for high-margin trading, along with a 50% profit split following a Wave Stop breach.
• His final payout was adjusted to $163.26, and the trader claims it was approved initially.
• However, approximately one hour later, he received a separate email stating that his payout had been rejected.
• The trader is now questioning why the payout was rejected after the previous review and approval.
• The key question: If the deductions and profit split had already been applied, what led to the subsequent rejection?
• We invite @AquaFunded to clarify the situation and explain the reason behind this decision.
Transparency and clear communication matter. Let’s hear both sides.
@LewisAquaFunded
#AquaFunded #PropFirm #ThePropTruth
Hi dear team @AquaFunded some of my payout is already approved and then after one hour receive email and says rejected how as it and why one time already reviewed by risk team and send me email and then rejected and also account close check this please @RyanAquaFunded @LewisAquaFunded @jadejma @ighotrades
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 Alpha Capital Group: $4,618 Payout Rejected After Risk Interview Issues?
• A trader @Abdir14Abdiwali has publicly shared his experience with Alpha Capital Group (ACG), claiming that his payout was rejected despite his efforts to cooperate with the firm’s risk interview process.
• According to the trader:
•
His first interview reportedly faced connection issues, requiring a rescheduled appointment.
• He says he joined the second meeting 10 minutes early but waited without anyone showing up.
• Despite providing evidence of his attendance, his $4,618.24 profit-share payout was rejected.
• The trader is now asking ACG to review his case fairly and provide a proper explanation.
• The key question: If a trader cooperates with the verification process, what went wrong, and why was the payout rejected?
• We encourage ACG to clarify the situation and give the trader a fair opportunity to have his evidence reviewed.
Evidence matters. Transparency matters. Fair treatment matters.
@AlphaCapitalUK @george_kohler
#AlphaCapitalGroup #ACG #PropFirm #ThePropTruth
This quoted post is unavailable.
The Prop Truth retweeted
Trader Alleges Funded Family Denied a $1,000 Payout and Closed His Accounts
• Trader @landotucker1 claims that @fundedfamily denied his $1,000 payout and closed his accounts over its All-or-Nothing Trading Rule.
According to the trader:
→ Purchased Sniper and Payday S2F accounts advertised with daily payouts, no daily loss limit, and no consistency rule.
→ Received 3 payouts across 2 accounts, totaling approximately $450.
→ Reported repeated dashboard issues around payout time, allegedly requiring additional trading days for his account to update.
→ Claims his accounts disappeared from the Funded Family dashboard and Tradovate while he was waiting for another payout.
The key question: Was the All-or-Nothing rule clearly communicated, and was it applied correctly in this case?
We need the full context before drawing conclusions.
The Prop Truth retweeted
The recent controversy of @lanto_trades about vest Exchange has sparked a lot of debate.
• According to the screenshot shared by @lanto_trades the trader spent around $300,000 on account purchases over the last eight months and received $388,000 in payouts after the split.
•That leaves approximately $88,000 in net profit, averaging around $11,000 per month.
• Now, that’s not a small achievement. Regardless of how many accounts he purchased or how much he spent, he managed to turn that investment into a positive return.
• Spending $300K and receiving $388K in payouts is still profitability. You may disagree with his approach, but the ability to generate that kind of return deserves recognition.
• Profitability isn’t just about how much you make. It’s also about how much you spend to make it.
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 $200K Account Terminated, $3,143 Payout Rejected
• Another serious allegation involving @AlphaCapitalUK.
• A trader @kytrades_ claims his $200K funded account was terminated and a $3,143 payout denied over alleged CID links to 24 other accounts.
• He also claims his purchased account refund and earned affiliate commissions have been withheld.
• These are the trader’s allegations, and the evidence behind the CID decision has not been independently verified.
• The key question: Will Alpha Capital provide a clear explanation and address these claims?
Transparency and evidence matter in every prop firm dispute.
We’ll be watching for both sides of the story. @george_kohler @AlphaCapitalUK
Really disappointed with how @AlphaCapitalUK have handled this.
After supporting and promoting them for so long as both a trader and affiliate, they’ve now banned me, terminated my $200K funded account and denied my $3,143 payout over accusations I know for a fact are completely false.
They’re claiming my devices have been linked to 24 other accounts through their CID system, something I completely deny. I’ve also seen other traders reporting similar bans and accusations, which makes this even more concerning.
To make matters worse, they’re now refusing to refund the $200K account I purchased and have also denied me access to the affiliate commissions I’ve legitimately earned from promoting their company.
I’ve done absolutely nothing wrong, yet I’m being punished without any convincing evidence to back up these accusations.
I’ve always spoken highly of Alpha, but the way I’ve been treated is honestly shocking.
All I’m asking for is a fair resolution and the money I’m owed.
@PropFirmsScams
@propfirmsupdate
@propfirmeye
@PropFirmMatch
The Prop Truth retweeted
• Some traders break the rules, acknowledge their mistakes, and then come to X portraying themselves as victims while publicly blaming the firm.
• Criticism is fair when justified, but accountability matters too. You cannot break the rules and expect the consequences to disappear just because you post about it on Twitter.
• Rules matter, and accountability should go both ways.@fundingpips @avikkfp @Khldfx
I’m officially done with @fundingpips.
Passing a $100K account should be a milestone, not the moment when months-old issues suddenly come back to haunt you. Rules are important, but fairness, transparency, and timely enforcement matter too.
Like buying many 5-10k accounts passing them getting master account but when you pass 100k account the investigation starts lol.
After investing time, money, and effort into multiple accounts and receiving small payouts before, this experience has completely changed my trust in the firm. Traders deserve clarity from day one, not surprises at the finish line.
My full experience on Trustpilot 👇
trustpilot.com/reviews/6ad89…
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 FundingPips Closes Trader’s Account Just Before Payout Request
• A trader, @SwaiSadi, claims that FundingPips permanently closed his account following a third-party KYC audit, citing allegedly altered or inauthentic documents.
• What stands out is the timing: according to the trader, the account was closed just before he could request a payout — not after a payout request.
• His account showed $746.78 in profit (+7.5%) on a $10K Master account.
• FundingPips states that its decision is permanent and final. However, questions remain about the audit findings and the evidence behind the decision.
• @fundingpips — Can you clarify what was found and why the account was closed at this stage?
•Transparency matters, especially when a trader is in profit and a payout may be next.
@Khldfx @fundingpips @avikkfp
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 5 Approved Payouts. Then a Permanent Ban Over KYC?
• Another serious case involving @fundingpips.
• According to the trader @LiquidityAhmed , they received 5 approved payouts before their $50K account was permanently closed over an alleged “altered KYC document.”
• The trader denies altering any documents and has offered to undergo live video verification.
The key questions are:
• Why was the issue raised after five approved payouts?
• Was the trader given a fair opportunity to verify their identity?
• What evidence supports the alleged document alteration?
• KYC compliance is important, but serious allegations deserve clear explanations and a fair review process.
When a firm makes such an accusation, transparency matters.
The trader has publicly challenged the decision. Will @fundingpips provide a clear explanation?
@avikkfp @Khldfx
#FundingPips #PropFirms #ThePropTruth
$50K Account Permanently Closed After 5 Approved Payouts
@fundingpips permanently closed my account over an alleged “altered KYC document.” This is a false allegation.
I completed the KYC myself using my own original documents. No editing, no third party, nothing was altered.
I already received 5 approved payouts from them. Then I bought a new $50K account just 2 days before this email. The account was banned with no refund and only a vague compliance notice.
If they are going to accuse someone’s identity documents of being fraudulent, the least they should do is offer a live video verification call before permanently closing the account and keeping the money.
@Khldfx I’m ready to do a fair review on a video call anytime. Please look into this.
Thank you to everyone who takes the time to read and share this. I appreciate it. ❤️
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 SHARK FUNDED PAYOUT REJECTION RAISES QUESTIONS
• Trader @Kaleem30005637 claims Shark Funded rejected his payout, reportedly citing “fake scan” as the reason.
•The trader also shared a dashboard screenshot showing transactions marked “Rejected” and “Pending.”
• However, the payout amount, account size, and full circumstances behind the rejection remain unclear.
• The key question for @SharkFundedfirm: What exactly triggered the rejection?
• If a payout is denied, traders deserve a specific explanation of the rule allegedly violated and the evidence supporting that decision.
• A dashboard status alone doesn’t tell the full story. Clear communication from the firm is needed to understand what actually happened.
@SharkFundedfirm @ibrahimshkh10
#SharkFunded #PropFirms #PayoutIssues
This quoted post is unavailable.
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 ATLAS FUNDED REJECTS $800 PAYOUT OVER ALLEGED COPY TRADING
• A trader, @fvgflow_trades, claims Atlas Funded rejected his $800 payout and permanently disabled his $50K account over an alleged copy-trading violation.
• The firm cited “COPY_TRADING_DETECTED” and “Confirmed Coordinated Trading Activity,” but the rejection note shown in the screenshot says “None.”
• The trader disputes the conclusion, stating that he uses his own ICT + MSNR strategy and can explain every flagged trade.
• The key question: What specific evidence supports the copy-trading allegation?
•If a firm permanently disables an account and rejects a payout, traders deserve a clear explanation of the evidence behind that decision.
• Rules must be enforced fairly — but allegations should also be backed by transparent, verifiable evidence.
@atlasfunded @PipsCabal @LAntonioAF
#PropFirms #PropTrading #Trading
Atlas Funded denied my $800 payout & permanently disabled my account over an alleged copy-trading violation.
@atlasfunded @PipsCabal
I’ve reviewed their evidence and believe the conclusion is incorrect. I use my own ICT + MSNR strategy and can explain every trade they flagged.
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 FUNDEDNEXT FACES QUESTIONS OVER $19,000+ IN UNPAID REWARDS
• According to an Elite Trader @realasalya previously certified by FundedNext has reportedly been denied more than $19,000 in performance rewards over an alleged copy-trading violation.
• The trader reportedly placed similar trades manually across personally owned accounts, without automation or third-party tools. The accounts reportedly remained active while the rewards were withheld.
• The main concern is the evidence behind the decision.
• How does FundedNext distinguish copy trading from independent traders using similar strategies? And what specific evidence supports the alleged violation?
• Prop firms have the right to enforce their rules, but withholding thousands of dollars in rewards deserves a clear, case-specific explanation.
When significant payouts are at stake, transparency matters.
@FundedNext @Jayed_FN @galibsyed_
#FundedNext #PropTrading #PropFirms
AN OPEN LETTER TO FUNDEDNEXT
Over $19,000 in Profits Denied — Is This Really How We Treat Traders?
Dear @FundedNext,
I'm writing this publicly as Rami Asalya, founder of Traders Cave, on behalf of my student, Sham Fares, who has been denied a Performance Reward of over $19,000.
I have spent over 12 years in the financial markets, mentoring traders and helping people build the discipline, knowledge, and consistency required to succeed.
And today, I find myself asking a very serious question:
Since when did taking similar trades on accounts belonging to the same trader become a reason to deny someone the profits they worked so hard to generate?
Sham did not use a trade copier. She did not use automated software. She manually executed her trades based on her own analysis and trading decisions.
Yet FundedNext has decided to withhold more than $19,000, citing its copy trading policy.
I understand that prop firms have rules. I respect the importance of compliance, and I always teach my students to respect the conditions of the firms they trade with.
But there is a difference between enforcing rules and enforcing them in a way that raises serious questions about fairness.
If a trader identifies an opportunity in the market and independently executes the same idea across accounts they personally own, does that automatically make them a copy trader?
If manual execution is prohibited under certain circumstances, how clearly is that communicated to traders before they invest their time, money, and effort?
And most importantly:
Should a trader lose over $19,000 without receiving a detailed explanation of the specific trades and evidence supporting such a serious decision?
We're talking about real people here.
People who spend countless hours studying charts, managing risk, controlling their emotions, and working toward financial independence.
For Sham, this isn't just a number on a dashboard. It's the result of dedication, discipline, and hard work.
What concerns me most is the message decisions like this send to the trading community.
Are prop firms supposed to encourage disciplined, profitable traders, or make them increasingly afraid that their profits could be denied after they've earned them?
I am not asking FundedNext for special treatment.
I am asking for transparency, accountability, and fairness.
If Sham violated a clearly established rule, provide the specific evidence, explain exactly how the violation occurred, and demonstrate why withholding the entire reward is justified.
But if the decision is based primarily on similarities between manually executed trades, then I believe the case deserves a serious and independent review.
FundedNext has built its reputation on providing opportunities to traders worldwide.
The question now is whether that commitment extends to protecting traders when a payout dispute arises.
I respectfully call on @FundedNext to reconsider Sham Fares' case, provide a transparent explanation, and allow a senior compliance review of the decision to withhold her $19,000+ Performance Reward.
To the trading community, I want to ask one question:
Do you believe a trader should lose $19,000+ simply because they manually executed similar trades across their own accounts?
I'd genuinely like to hear your thoughts.
Rami Asalya
Founder, Traders Cave
12+ Years in Financial Markets
#FundedNext #PropTrading #TradingCommunity #TraderRights #Transparency
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 $30,000 IN PAYOUTS — THEN A BAN?
• A trader @flexxtrades claims to have received $30K in payouts from MyFundedFutures and made another $17K on his live account.
• After accidentally requesting the maximum payout, he says he breached his live account without losing the money.
• Following a 21-day cooldown, he tried to purchase another challenge — only to find himself banned.
• MyFundedFutures’ email states that its decision was based on internal policies and its Terms of Service, but provides no specific explanation in the screenshot.
• The key question: What exactly triggered the ban?
• If a trader has already received substantial payouts, shouldn’t they be given a clear explanation when their access is terminated?
• Transparency matters. Traders deserve to know the specific rule involved, not just a generic termination email.
@MyFundedFutures @MattLeech
#PropFirms #MyFundedFutures #PropTrading
whats this bs lol? I got 30K in payouts and 17K on live, breached my live due to requesting max payout on accident so didnt lose anything and after 21 day cooldown I try to rebuy a challenge and I randomly get banned? @MattLeech @MyFundedFutures
The Prop Truth retweeted
Congratulations to all the winners -
@adityasm27
@SUHASGOWDA0703
@derur69267
@Black_margin
@LiquidityKill
Kindly raise ticket on discord -discord.gg/HkucMJ4ch
5 x $10k ACCOUNTS GIVEAWAY 🎁
We’re giving 5 traders a chance to start trading with $10k account.
To enter:
• Follow- @theproptruth @Orionfundedcom @OrionAffiliates
• Like the post and repost
• Tag 3 traders below
• Join discord -discord.gg/wJ85zWEEk
• Also follow - @umarweb_3 @Dan_BabaFX
Winners will announce in 7 days . Good luck 🤝
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 Payout Approved, Then Rejected: Alpha Futures Case
• A $1,777.50 payout was reportedly approved and later rejected over alleged group trading.
• According to the trader @lahloua903 , Alpha Futures flagged 10 matched trades out of 595.
The key questions remain:
• Which 10 trades triggered the violation?
• What evidence supports the group-trading claim?
• Why was the payout rejected after approval?
If a rule was violated, show the evidence. Traders deserve transparency, not unanswered questions.
@Alpha_Futures_
@george_kohler
#AlphaFutures #PropFirm #PayoutIssues
My $1,777.50 payout from @Alpha_Futures was initially approved, then rejected over an alleged Group Trading violation. I requested evidence and a clear explanation. I’m seeking a fair review and transparency. Traders deserve answers. #AlphaFutures
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 MyForexFunds Terminates a $200K Account Over Alleged EA/Robot Trading
• Trader @panjisem erang claims that MyForexFunds accused him of using an Expert Advisor (EA) or trading robot, despite his statement that he trades manually using his phone.
• According to the trader, his $200K account was terminated while showing approximately $5,000 in profit.
• The key question: What evidence supports the EA-trading allegation?
• If a trader claims to execute trades manually, the firm should provide a clear explanation of the evidence behind its decision.
Transparency and verifiable evidence matter when funded accounts and trader profits are at stake.
@MyForexFunds — what is the basis for this termination?
These are the trader’s allegations; the firm’s response has not been included in the available evidence.
Dear @theproptruth
Myforexfunds accused me using expert advisor / robot trading on my account. I never use of it and i trade it manually using my phone. They terminate my $200k trading account for such accused. I still have 5k profit in that $200k.
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 Trader Banned by Tradeify After 16 Live Accounts and Nearly $480K in Payouts
• According to the report, the trader @kaiweeen received nearly $200K in live payouts and another $280K in payouts before Tradeify permanently banned him.
• The firm's reason? All 16 live accounts eventually hit a full loss.
• But here's the question: Are the rules being applied consistently to every trader?
• If other traders can blow live accounts without facing a ban, why was this trader permanently removed after such a significant payout history?
• Traders deserve clear rules, consistent enforcement, and transparency — not uncertainty about what happens after they become profitable.
• Where should firms draw the line between risk management and trader access?
@Tradeify @BrettSimba
Got banned from Tradeify.
Had basically 3 sets of 5 × $150K live accounts and one 150k throughout my live journey.
close to $200,000 in live payouts and $280,000 in sim payouts.
I know people who blew their live accounts way more times than I did and never got banned, but what do I know...
nevertheless It was a good run o7
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 Lucid Trading: $4,000 Payout Dispute Raises Transparency Concerns
• According to trader @acceptblies requesting around $4,000 in payouts was asked to redo KYC, had their account blocked, and was permanently banned for alleged cross-user hedging.
• The key concern? The trader claims no evidence or details about the allegedly linked user were provided.
• If a rule was violated, Lucid Trading should provide a clear explanation and supporting evidence.
•A payout request should trigger a review—not leave traders without answers.
@TradingLucid — Will you publicly clarify the reasons behind this case? @ajtradinglucid
Hey can anyone help me out??
I was supposed to request a few payouts that add up to around $4,000 yesterday and @TradingLucid said I had to redo KYC and blocked my account. Then said they found proof of cross-user hedging and permanently banned me.
Who is this other user that is cross hedging with me??
Makes 0 sense because I’ve only ever traded alone. I started my discord only a few days ago and have never called any trades out or even gone live..
I’ve never had any issues with payouts from multiple other firms.
@ajtradinglucid
@Maneq_
@AndrewTradesNQ
@VClouette
@benrhaytrades
@nqvtrades
@fredtrades
@Ploovik
@RomanianUSA
@Ev_Trades
@rickytradez
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 Lucid Trading Bans Trader After Payout Request of 12000$ 🚨
• A trader @Terence46128382 claims @LucidTrading banned him after he requested a payout on two LucidDaily $50K accounts.
According to the trader :
• Over $12K in profits at stake.
• Lucid permanently restricted the accounts after a broker and internal risk review.
• The firm says it cannot disclose the risk factors or allow an appeal.
• The dashboard showed a $12,420 cash-out option.
The key question: If a trader reaches the payout stage, shouldn’t they receive a clear explanation for a permanent ban and the forfeiture of profits?
Risk controls matter. But transparency and accountability matter too.
what’s your take on this case?
@TradingLucid @ajtradinglucid
#PropFirms #LucidTrading
@PropFirmsGuru Lucid banned me right after requesting a payout once hitting Lucid Daily 50K Max payout for 2 accounts. No explanation. No nothing. Mentioned Live team unable to provide live trading services at the moment. Profits of over 12k gone with the wind.
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 FTMO TERMINATES MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS AND PERMANENTLY BANS A TRADER
• FTMO has terminated multiple accounts and permanently suspended a trader @FX_TRADER_RAJ over alleged coordinated trading across multiple registrations.
• According to the notice, FTMO claims the trading activity was coordinated rather than independently executed. The trader disputes this and maintains that the accounts were traded independently and were profitable.
• The key issue? The trader is asking for specific evidence behind the decision.
• FTMO has cited its terms and conditions, but the trader says the underlying data and analysis supporting the allegation have not been provided.
• Rules matter. But when multiple accounts are terminated and a trader is permanently banned, transparency matters too.
• FTMO, will you provide clear, evidence-based reasoning behind this decision?
Traders deserve clarity, not just allegations.
@FTMO_com
#FTMO #PropFirms #ThePropTruth
‼️🚨 TERMINATED, BLOCKED ‼️🚨
PROPFIRM 😡 BLOCKED ME 😡🚨‼️
Dear @FTMO_com, show me the actual proof of what rules I violated. Don’t make serious allegations without transparent evidence.
You terminated a profitable trader’s accounts and permanently banned me. Where is the proof? Where is the justification? I am Trading Independent show me Real Proof of i am not trading independently.
I deserve clear answers, not just accusations. 🎯
@Faded_Propfirm @PropFirmMatch @propfundsquad @Propfirm @PropFirmMedia @ppropfundsquad @Propfirm
#propfirm #cfdpropfirm
The Prop Truth retweeted
🚨 CID BANS BEFORE PAYOUTS: A REPEATING CONCERN AT FUNDINGPIPS
• Another trader @ouakanmehdi10 claims @FundingPips closed two accounts just 4 days before a payout request over an alleged “device match.”
• The trader says no clear evidence was provided, a live verification was refused, and $878.40 remains withheld.
• When profitable traders approach payout, CID-related bans raise serious questions about transparency and accountability.
• If a rule is violated, show clear evidence. Traders deserve answers, not unanswered questions.
@fundingpips @avikkfp @Khldfx
#ThePropTruth
I never shared access. @FundingPips closed my accounts 4 days before payout over a "device match" with no date, no IP, no session. Same masked accounts under both CIDs. 13 replies, 11 questions, 0 answers. Live check refused. $878.40 held. Ticket 2519740 @Khldfx @avikkfp
