Pinned Tweet
Something very concerning is happening in Hull & East Yorkshire. The new Reform UK Mayor has launched a website for a “£1m Community Fund.” Here’s why residents should be worried 👇 1/10
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
It is disgraceful that Andy Burnham took an hour out to appear on Gogglebox just to raise money for Stand Up To Cancer. If he's going to do a TV show he should do what I did and pocket £1.5million for eating some kangaroo bollocks.
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
insane that people were trying to have a go at him for going on gogglebox when it’s literally for Stand Up To Cancer
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
Here we have the Leader of the tory party, using her time to go a tv show to complain that the leader of the Labour party made time to go on a tv show to raise money for cancer charities.
Happy Friday
" I just don't know how he's got the time"
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has questioned how the PM has time to go on TV show, Gogglebox, during her appearance on @BBCBreakfast
Read more about Andy Burnham's appearance on this show here: bbc.in/48ahty6
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
Did they care about politically neutrality when Nadine Dorries and Matt Hancock were lolloping about on ITV, for I’m a Celeb?
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
For those mocking the PM for going on Gogglebox:
It's for Stand Up to Cancer.
For those mocking his tattoo:
It's the Manchester Bee, done after the Manchester Arena Attack, where 22 died and 100's more were injured.
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
Student finance is uncomfortable territory for Lib Dems, but we can't just bury our heads in the sand.
Those of us in positions of responsibility have a duty to fix what's broken, even when it's uncomfortable.
My piece for @libdemvoice👇
libdemvoice.org/winning-back…
Cllr Tom Astell retweeted
I listened to Ed Davey on the @BBCr4today this morning, and frankly, I think he missed the point.
The idea that we're keeping the triple lock to help millennials is at best for the birds, and at worst downright insulting. I say that as a millennial.
The case for the triple lock is a worthy one - stopping pensioner poverty. I want that as much as anyone. But pensioners are now less likely to be in poverty than children or working age adults.
We talk about fairness, yet our answer is to give the same increase to every pensioner, treating the one choosing between heating and eating exactly the same as the one with millions in the bank. I can see no moral or fiscal case for above inflation rises for millionaires.
That money should go where it's needed most - to everyone in poverty, not just one group. It could help fund free personal care, a policy that would disproportionately benefit older people.
Ed is right that we shouldn't pit one generation against another. But intergenerational inequality is already one of the defining injustices of our time, and this would further entrench it. Worse, it gaslights an entire generation into believing it's for our benefit.
Telling millennials we're keeping the triple lock to help us in 30 years' time is nonsense. We're on course to be the first generation worse off than our parents. We're locked out of the housing market, paying higher taxes, repaying student loans that never seem to shrink, and putting off having children because of the cost of living.
I joined this party because I care about fairness and tackling inequality, and that has to include inequality between generations.
This line, and this decision, fails on both counts. Ed needs to think again.
I’ve lost confidence in billionaires
Billionaire Man United owner says he has lost confidence in the UK bbc.in/3Vo0FAF




































