vjohniqv

Thank you for your work and openness to the community! Since the community has the opportunity to speak out, I will take advantage of this. Nansen and Chaos did an excellent job, with minimal false-positive filters. However, it is difficult to agree with many of the community reports, and I want to add my comments to some of the reports, including one that I myself was affected by. commonwealth.im/layerzero/di… Based on my social circle and community (about 6k people), there are a lot of false-positive results in this report because many people used the Bungee product, where the maximum transferable tokens per transaction are limited, and it was often necessary to use multiple transactions in a row with the same (maximum) amount. The use of any software has nothing to do with it. commonwealth.im/layerzero/di… Finding sybils through public software is a great idea, but using the software does not make the user a sybil. This is a great starting point for further searches, but there is no evidence that everyone who used the software is a sybil, as this can be done with a single account (a farmer is not equal to a sybil) or by using a referral link, not the software. commonwealth.im/layerzero/di… My wallet was included in one of the clusters of this report, but I have no relation to the other wallets, and I ask you to reconsider it. The search is not too detailed, and there are many false-positive results.