Willis retweeted
DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis:
"One person who really understands AI will outperform an entire startup team
In 5 years, the people who build with AI will run whole companies with a tenth of the headcount"
Willis retweeted
China puts data centers in Malaysia to get access to compute they can't get in China due to sanctions. The US puts data centers in Malaysia because every state bans data centers. AGI happens. Malaysia nationalizes all the data centers and becomes the sole hegemon of the world.
Exactly 😂
Tesla has no government contracts and President Trump ended federal incentives for electric vehicles.
SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now.
Happy to cancel any that the government doesn’t want. Just say the word!
Willis retweeted
Elon Musk: "Mesmo que eu seja criticado por todo o mundo, não vou largar o X". O motivo faz pensar.
Repórter: "Por que você se apega tanto ao X?"
Elon: "O que você quer dizer com isso?"
Repórter: "Desde a aquisição, só há críticas, não é?"
Elon: "É verdade."
Repórter: "Políticos também o criticam."
Elon: "Sim."
Repórter: "Há conflitos com autoridades reguladoras."
Elon: "É verdade."
Repórter: "Honestamente, não seria mais fácil vendê-lo?"
Elon: "Por quê?"
Repórter: "Você tem a Tesla e a SpaceX, não é?"
Elon: "Tenho sim."
Repórter: "Não há necessidade de ficar no centro das controvérsias, certo?"
Elon: "Mas o que isso resolveria?"
Repórter: "...... Hein?"
Elon: "Eu acho importante ter um lugar onde as opiniões possam ser trocadas livremente."
Repórter: "Mas há opiniões desagradáveis também, não é?"
Elon: "Claro."
Repórter: "Há opiniões erradas também."
Elon: "É verdade."
Repórter: "Então, não deveria haver restrições?"
Elon: "Até onde restringir?"
Repórter: "Isso é..."
Elon: "Quem decide quais são as opiniões corretas?"
Repórter: "..."
Elon: "É fácil proteger apenas as opiniões com as quais concordamos."
Repórter: "Sim."
Elon: "Mas e quando surgem opiniões contrárias?"
Repórter: "..."
Elon: "É aí que o verdadeiro teste da liberdade de expressão acontece, não acha?"
Willis retweeted
Applications are now open for the Anthropic Residency, a paid, fixed-term research program for academics, technical founders, and staff-level engineers who want to make AI safe and beneficial for everyone. No ML background is required.
Apply by November 22: alignment.anthropic.com/2026…
Willis retweeted
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Willis retweeted
🚨 THIS WEBSITE IS REALLY SCARY.
It's called World Monitor and it's like having a radar to detect what's happening in the world before everyone else.
Welcome to world-monitor.com, where you don't read the world, you monitor it.
Willis retweeted
Introducing agent-desktop
agent-browser, for your whole computer
→ Computer Use for any coding agent
→ macOS, Windows and Linux
→ Runs in bg while you keep working
→ Agents use your computer in parallel, each with its own cursor
Willis retweeted
Steve Jurvetson once told Elon Musk a story he had never heard before.
At a Google event, Larry Page turned to Jurvetson out of the blue and wondered aloud how much money he had. After mentioning a number, Page said that if he were hit by a bus that day, he should leave all of it to Elon Musk.
Elon asked if he had really said that. Jurvetson confirmed it and joked that he immediately wanted to get it in writing.
Elon said he loved that and called Page a good friend. He noted they had known each other since around 1997, before Page received venture funding.
Jurvetson added that Page believed a corporation pursuing goals aligned with his own interests—such as moving away from oil and colonizing other planets—would accomplish far more than giving the money to a nonprofit. Page wished he could do more of that himself.
Willis retweeted
Replying to @TuanNguyen_6789
Brother, I know you love us, and always support us, but you’re over-interpreting this, in a bad way.
I never said “selling SPCX shares”. I mentioned we have them only because the FTX comparison in the thread may have implied we lacked funds, which is not true. My point was that we hold assets outside of crypto, even in an area familiar to him.
I don’t make threats. That’s one of my core principles I even wrote in my book. Also, our holdings is a drop in the ocean for them. No threats possible. And I think it will be one of the best stocks to hold for a long time to come.
No need to pitch it as a fight or try to drive a wedge. Got enough problems to handle with as it is. 🤣



























