Former-vet-clinic-owner, now singer & activist; Women'sRights & BiologicalSex matter; Lezza

Joined December 2009
Their fears are justified The bill does not define ‘abuse’ Parents could find themselves separated from their children for months while waiting to go to court & for a judge to decide what ‘abusive’ means @oliviabaileymp is joyous at no carve out for parents #BinTheBill
2
1
5
43
ALLES OPERIERT. NICHTS GEHEILT. Die Flucht vor der eigenen Seele. Viele junge Menschen, die unter einem diffusen Unwohlsein im eigenen Körper oder seelischer Not leiden, finden heute schnell eine scheinbar klare Antwort: Das Unbehagen wird als Beweis für eine Transidentität gelesen – und die medizinisch-chirurgische Transition als der eine Weg, der endlich Frieden bringen soll. In einer Zeit, in der diese Deutung auf Social Media, in Peer Groups und in weiten Teilen des therapeutischen Systems dominant angeboten wird, entsteht ein fatales Muster: Was komplex und vielschichtig ist, verdichtet sich rasch zur scheinbar einzigen Lösung. Natürlich gibt es jene, bei denen nach sorgfältiger Abklärung eine medizinische Anpassung tatsächlich zu innerer Ruhe führt. Doch für einen grossen Teil der Betroffenen wird der operative Weg zu einem gefährlichen Ersatzschauplatz. Sobald jemand diesen Weg einmal beschritten hat und die ersten Operationen hinter sich hat, verändert sich die innere Logik. Die erhoffte Erleichterung bleibt aus oder ist nur kurz spürbar. Statt den Weg zu hinterfragen, verschiebt sich die Erklärung: "Es ist einfach noch nicht fertig. Noch eine Operation, noch etwas mehr Perfektion – dann wird alles gut." Genau dann wird ein Satz zum Mantra: "Wenn erst die nächste Operation vorbei ist, fängt mein echtes Leben an." Er klingt nach Hoffnung, ist aber ein Schutzschild. Solange man die nächste Operation in Aussicht hat oder noch ein Dokument fehlt, hat das Unbehagen eine Adresse: Einsamkeit? Liegt am falschen Körper. Keine innere Ruhe? Liegt an den fehlenden Hormonen. Beziehungen scheitern? Liegt daran, dass noch etwas fehlt. Selbstzweifel? Liegt daran, dass man noch nicht "vollständig" ist. Die Transition wird zum mächtigsten Ablenkungsmanöver: Sie gibt dem seelischen Leid ein klares Projekt. Man ist im Tunnel. Und dann kommt der Tag, vor dem kaum jemand warnt. Der Tag, an dem der letzte Schnitt verheilt ist. An dem kein Arzttermin mehr ansteht. An dem alle Papiere geändert sind und die Aussenwelt einen genau so liest, wie man es wollte. Alles ist erreicht. Man steht vor dem Spiegel – und es ist still. Keine Fanfaren. Keine Erlösung. In dieser Stille trifft einen die nüchterne Wahrheit: Der Körper ist verändert, aber die Seele ist dieselbe geblieben. Plötzlich gibt es keine Ausreden mehr. Das Unglück lässt sich nicht länger auf ein fehlendes Körperteil schieben oder am vermeintlich falschen Geschlecht festmachen. Viele erkennen erst hier, dass sie jahrelang vermieden haben, den wirklichen Ursachen ihrer inneren Konflikte und ihrem realen Leben ins Auge zu blicken. Ich kenne diese Situation aus eigener Erfahrung. Und ich sehe sie heute bei vielen jungen Menschen, deren Ursachen im affirmativen System nie wirklich hinterfragt wurden. Wer an diesem Punkt ankommt, steht vor einer Wahl: Entweder man klammert sich weiter an die Hoffnung, dass ein weiterer Eingriff die ersehnte Erlösung bringt, oder man findet den Mut, innezuhalten und sich der eigenen Wahrheit zu stellen. Denn man kann den Körper bis zur Unkenntlichkeit verändern – aber man nimmt sich selbst immer mit. 🙏 #Transition #Detransition #Transidentität #Transgender #MentalHealth
17
77
10
301
13,505
A really important🧵 The points about impact on resources are absolutely applicable to social work. Investigating alleged conversion practices, will take scarce SW resources away from investigating children at risk of real serious harm. The Bill is a safeguarding disaster.
🧵From a policing perspective the Conversion Practices Bill will constitute a potentially huge drain on already vastly over-stretched resources. Every case of a trans-identifying person coming up against someone who values reality will potentially result in a call for service.
3
5
15
374
9,516 SIGNATURES! JUST 484 TO GO! Come on, everyone! Surely there are 484 people on here who haven't signed yet?! 🙏 We're SO close to 10,000 signatures on our petition calling for the words woman, girl, mother and pregnant woman to be retained in government, NHS, education and public bodies. These words matter. Our language matters. Women and girls deserve to be named. As do Men, Fathers and boys. 484 people. That's all we need to reach 10,000. Come on, X we can do this! 💪❤️
4
42
5
59
2,452
Replying to @yonners @UKLabour
Incredible that @uklabour is doing this to our lesbian daughters #TransingAwayTheGay @andyburnham this isn't your Bill #BinTheBill @BinTheBill_
1
3
9
65
#Halloween2026 is approaching, neighbours are erecting their tributes to #Aragog 😱 Can we #arachnophobes (you too @jk_rowling ) confer on this..? Yes, it's a jumping #spider ..but it's very small & it's brought us a flower - can it stay in the house?? (Others shown for scale)
1
33
Parrot is telling his dog friend the story of the day
2
36
Replying to @serenstar4
Thank you, Tina. You're not the only trans person who's supported me in this, but I appreciate it every single time x
36
146
2
8,606
121,691
Im transsexual, immutably M & always stay out of F spaces, services & sports, I follow the law without exception & respect boundaries. Egregious overreach of odious trans activism is destroying rights of women & girls with endless illegitimate access demands. A magnificent essay.
93
347
15
6,977
199,144
One might think a man convicted of tying another man to a radiator and assaulting him would resist the temptation to harass anyone, but I suppose the kind of man who’d tie another man to a radiator and assault him isn’t bothered by such niceties. cbc.ca/news/entertainment/bo…
34
173
3
1,751
27,304
Shocking new data out of Washington state on trans-related diagnoses. "Even measured against the DSM-5’s highest estimates, the 2022 rate among teen girls in Washington was nearly 600 times greater, and among teen boys nearly 60 times greater." By @LeorSapir in @CityJournal.
NEW: At least 15,437 Washington minors had a transgender-related diagnosis on their insurance claims from 2017 to 2023. In 2022, that included 1 in 58 teen girls. A new @ManhattanInst analysis of insurance-claims data 🧵
31
225
15
778
19,791
I sang for a Rescued Tiger and this happened
105
521
60
3,058
42,526
The Woman of the Day is the Anglo-Saxon noblewoman Godgifu of West Mercia, the only woman to remain a landholder in Britain after those robbing Normans swept in and stole everything that wasn’t nailed down (and quite a few things that were). Of course you’ve heard of her. You’ve heard of the Godiva Procession which was instituted in 1678 by Coventry Fair to commemorate the legendary ride by the Lady. Taking pity on the people of Coventry suffering grievously under her husband's oppressive taxation, she called his bluff that he would repeal the taxes if she would strip naked and ride through the streets of the town, clothed only in her long hair. She only agreed on the condition that everyone stayed indoors and shut their windows, but a tailor known ever afterwards as Peeping Tom disobeyed and was struck blind. Allegedly. It was all bunkum. Absolute bunkum. Lady Godiva’s real name was Godgifu. She married Leofric, Earl of Mercia, but both she and her husband were major philanthropists and among the most munificent of the Anglo-Saxon nobility until the Norman Conquest in 1066 (and those robbing Normans came along, etc). In Anglo-Saxon times, in laws dated around 1008 AD, women enjoyed full property rights, from peasant to nobility. They could own land, farms, houses. Upon marriage, a husband was legally required to give his wife a Morgengifu (Morning Gift): land, money, or goods, which remained her independent property that she could sell, give away, or manage as she chose. Women wrote their own wills and left property to whomever they chose including children, servants, or religious institutions, and they didn’t need their husband's permission. All that stopped after 1066. The new feudal system tied land ownership to military service, something women were barred from providing. Women became the chattels (property) of their husbands if they were married, or their fathers if they were not, a legal state known as coverture. Still, I’m sure the Normans thought they were being progressive and inclusive, two words I’ve come to loathe. But I digress. Godgifu survived the death of her husband and was mentioned in the Domesday Book, one of the few Anglo-Saxons and the only woman to remain a major landholder after the Conquest. Godgifu certainly would have ridden a horse but not in protest and certainly not minus her clothes. Still, the idea of it proved quite a crowd pleaser at Coventry Fair in 1678, even though the first fake Lady Godiva was actually a lad. Yes, I know. Some things just don’t change. In the intervening years, the myth was spiced up by the Puritans to prove a moral point but dampened down by other Protestants to make it fit for delicate ears. Never forget: the objectification of women is eternal, along with its fraternal twin, misogyny. The two generally go hand in hand. Despite several attempts to shut down the procession — in 1845, the Mayor got fed up with the crowds jostling to get a better view of her, expostulating, “It’s a disgrace”, and in 1854, the Bishop of Worcester protested against “a Birmingham whore being paraded through the streets as Lady Godiva” — it continued as a annual event until the 1960s. Godgifu’s date of birth is unknown but she died in her mid-fifties in 1067 after the Norman Conquest of 1066. The Domesday Book of 1086 notes that the lands formerly held by her had passed to others. Men of course. Chattels are property, and property cannot own property. Married women finally achieved independent taxation in their own right in 1990. Prior to that, their husbands were responsible for paying tax on their income unless she obtained his signature and consent to claim her own single person's allowance and pay tax on her own earnings. Her unearned income — such as investment or savings interest — still legally belonged to him. And of course, the "marital rape exemption" — the legal assumption that a wife could not withhold sexual consent from her husband under the marriage contract — was not formally abolished in English law until 1991. 935 years. It only took 935 years in this country to demolish the legal status and definition of Woman as Property, and despite the Supreme Court ruling, we still find ourselves having to dismantle the definition of Woman as a feeling — with political parties, Civil Service departments, with trade unions, charities, retailers, and with sporting bodies. I know many of us are tired of fighting the same old battles but keep going, sisters. “We woman suffragists have a great mission — the greatest mission the world has ever known. It is to free half the human race, and through that freedom to save the rest.” Emmeline Pankhurst, 17 October 1912.
52
350
28
1,068
18,047
"Could a court say you have to call your 11-year-old non-binary daughter a they/them? Do you have to allow your child to wear a breast binder if she wants to? And then that becomes criminal if you don't do it?!" @HJoyceGender of @SexMattersOrg with @janmacvarish of @SpeechUnion @ #BattleFest 2026 "Conversion Practices Bill: criminalising parents, teachers and priests?" 👇
2
30
2
61
4,619
‘Weak leadership combined with ideological capture, perceived prestige for the organisation, and fear had all led to children being harmed.’ Gender ideology has spread like wildfire through the NHS. The casualties: kids and whistleblowers. Free to read. thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/a…
276
2,125
21
11,942
244,761
URGENT! 'How to submit evidence to the parliamentary commitee on the draft #ConversionPracticesBill ..'
How to submit evidence to the parliamentary commitee on the draft Conversion Practices Bill. Step 1: Put the deadline in your diary - 16th November 2026 Step 2: Read this guidance from Sex Matters sex-matters.org/take-action/…
2
5
66
Write about specific problems with the bill from your perspective. For example: - The impact it will have on you and your family - The impact it will have on communities and groups you are part of - The impact it will have on your ability to do your job - Experience you have that can help the committee understand the harms and problems with the bill - Evidence you are aware of that can help the committee understand the harms and problems with the bill.
1
8
42
1,554
Read the committee's questions committees.parliament.uk/sub… You might want to focus on: - Does the draft bill meets the Government’s stated aims? - Does it address a gap in existing legislation? - Are the concepts and thresholds clear and appropriate? - Are CP protection orders a good idea? - Does the bill strike the right balance with privacy, freedom and family life? - Is the healthcare exemption adequate?
2
12
41
1,187
Frequently asked questions: - Who can submit evidence? Both individuals & orgs - Do you have to answer all the questions? No - Can you publish your submission? No. Wait for the committee to publish it. - Can you ask to be anonymous? Yes you can - Can you use AI? Yes but check its work and declare it
1
7
46
1,557