Logos retweeted
People killed by AI: zero
People killed by governments: millions
Let's give control of AI to the governments and call it safety
Logos retweeted
We are long, long, long overdue to reduce the amount of KYC we do as a society.
It doesn’t stop crime. It enables mass surveillance of the innocent by the tyrannical. And, perhaps most of all, it enriches hackers with troves of intimate personal data.
p2p.coincenter.org/p/the-hug…
Logos retweeted
Honestly Saylor isn't even close to the biggest retard in crypto
It's the people buying his dumb ass products
Instead of having a drugged up maniac gamble by buying high and selling low for you you might as well do it yourself
At least the gambling will be fun for a while
Logos retweeted
Bitcoin maximalism is an inverse prosperity gospel. The more you believe in it the poorer you become
Logos retweeted
This is our future if we permit state regulation of AI
Models will become permissioned
Users will become permissioned
Intelligence itself, permissioned
Always for safety.
After nearly 2 years of using Claude for legitimate software development, my account was suddenly suspended for “unusual activity”
I relied on Claude Code daily as a $200 Max subscriber
This has brought all my active projects to a halt
@AnthropicAI @claudeai @ClaudeDevs
Logos retweeted
Mark Zuckerberg gets it right:
“The defining question of our age isn’t whether superintelligence will exist, but who will have access to it. Will it be centralized and restricted to a few institutions, or will it be a tool that empowers everyone?”
Concentration of power is the biggest risk of AI. When a small number of labs (working hand-in-glove with the administrative state) decide who has access to which model capabilities, they inevitably shape what can be said, known, and built. That’s not “safety.” It’s control.
As Mark points out, the history of open source shows that broad access and transparency are usually the best path to actual security and resilience. Decentralization creates checks and balances on power. By contrast, centralized alternatives, like bureaucratic approval regimes and mandatory gatekeeping, typically produce regulatory capture and reinforce cartels.
Personal superintelligence in everyone’s hands, with competing models and real data sovereignty, is a far better check on a dystopian future than self-appointed guardians who claim to be “aligned” with all of humanity.
Logos retweeted
I have a report full of security issues of a software I'm working on.
Codex won't fix them because of Cyber guardrails
Fable won't fix them because of Cyber guardrails
Kimi K3 fixed them all. No restrictions, just gets the job done.
This will end badly for OpenAI & Anthropic.
Logos retweeted
Kimi K3 just fixed 15 critical security bugs that Codex and Fable refused because of “cyber guardrails.” There’s no reason to limit American models on tasks that Chinese models handle without issue. We’re only making ourselves less competitive.
Logos retweeted
The "ungovernability" (and openness) of Linux and the Internet is precisely what has made their success.
The same will be true of open weight AI foundation models.
Logos retweeted
yes
The future is open source. We need to embrace it and get on with it.
Imagine if America closed the door on open source.
We would explicitly be forcing American companies to pay $26-56 per 1MM tokens for the same intelligence their adversaries/competitors around the world would pay $0.50-1 for.
This is economically unsustainable unless AI is bullshit.
If it’s the supposed through line of all future economic activity that we’ve been told it is, we can’t handicap America at such a meaningful cost disadvantage.
This can also be viewed thru a military lens and not just a simple economic one as well.
Letting our adversaries attack us for $0.50 per 1MM tokens while we spend $26-56 per 1MM tokens to defend ourselves is equally ruinous.
It’s the Cold War Soviet collapse in reverse.
Logos retweeted
AI is different from Linux in one important respect: frontier models require enormous capital investment. But that's not unprecedented. The Internet itself required hundreds of billions in capital—fiber, data centers, routers, servers, undersea cables. Yet its core protocols and much of its software remained open, and capitalism didn't collapse. Value shifted to infrastructure, services, ecosystems, and customer relationships, producing some of the most profitable companies in history.
What worries me more is how quickly this argument turns into a plea for government protection of incumbents, usually wrapped in fear of China. If AI is strategically important, let's have that conversation. But using geopolitical fears to justify concentrating AI development in a handful of government-favored firms seems far closer to the authoritarian model we should be resisting than an open ecosystem that distributes power and competition.
Logos retweeted
Over the past several decades, America has become more closed and authoritarian, while China has become more open and market-oriented. Those not paying attention still call the former capitalist, and the latter communist.
The current situation with AI models developing in both countries is downstream of this cultural/political trend, and I wonder if the future will be set by it.
Big news: Kimi-K3 by @Kimi_Moonshot is now #1 in the Frontend Code Arena with 1679 pts, surpassing Claude Fable 5.
This is a 17-place jump from Kimi-k2.6 (#18 -> #1).
In Frontend, Kimi-K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 domains: Brand & Marketing, Reference-Based Design, Data & Analytics, Consumer Product, Simulations, and Content Creation Tools, landing #2 only in Gaming behind Fable 5.
The full model weights will be released by July 27.
Congrats to the @Kimi_Moonshot team on this major milestone!
