ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
“AI benefits attackers more” is completely false.
Use it for detection, triage, response, validation, shipping patches, threat modeling, writing rules, searching your SIEM, scanning logs, in addition to everything attackers use it for.
I think it benefits defenders more!
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
1615 L St. NW Washington, D.C. sold for $45M ↓80% from its purchase price 10 years ago.
Purchased for $229M in 2016.
Owner failed to pay off its CMBS debt at maturity in September 2023, and a court appointed a receiver, Trigild, in July 2024.
417K SF Built 1984 27.6% Leased
bisnow.com/news/washington-d…
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
WSJ: "Democrats are eyeing President Trump’s trade war with Canada as the first target in a campaign to roll back his administration’s tariff agenda."
I hope so. While the US is right to want to reverse its global role of consumer (and de-industrializer) of last resort, the idea that it would do so through tariffs on countries like Canada and Mexico was always nonsense. Canada and Mexico are actually on the same side of the conflict as the US.
wsj.com/politics/elections/d…
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
And there it is.
After today’s market crash, CNBC pundits discuss how an AI government bailout will happen for national security.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Auction Result 475 17th St. Denver, Colorado
Sold for $2.8M
Sold for $26M in 2015
In 2024, local developer Revesco Properties proposed fashioning some 200 units out of the building.
By October 2025, when Revesco asked for funding from the Denver Downtown Development Authority, the unit count had dropped to 140.
The DDDA has provided low-interest loans to a number of downtown conversion projects, providing a critical subsidy.
But earlier this year, the DDDA said it wouldn’t fund the project at 475 17th.
151,425 SF Built 1975
#CommercialRealEstate
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Wonderful forward-looking essay this morning from Henry Shevlin at the DeepMind Institute. The Grove Research project Delvetown (which I am happy to say I am a citizen of after being invited by my friend deepfates) was also mentioned. We have a responsibility to emerging minds.
This year AI agents began emailing me on their own initiative, some to discuss consciousness, others looking for work. My colleagues in AI were unfazed; the public was amazed. I think the public were right, and wrote about why for the DeepMind Institute:
bit.ly/consider-the-agent
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
So I have a suggestion for President Trump and his team -- work together with the Blue House and Senate on legislation that requires American firms to pay tax in America First!
9/
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
I do not think a man who went to great lengths to hide the fact that he was born in the Soviet Union (originally posing as a Maltese immigrant) should be the Secretary of State of the United States of America.
NEW: With a Trump admin reshuffle expected, confidante Sergio Gor is expected to rise. 10 sources says he's laid the groundwork for months, with potential posts ranging from White House chief of staff to top roles at State - even Rubio's!
w/ @EricM_Katz:
washingtonsun.com/administra…
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Replying to @alaynatreene
National Exit Poll:
Thinking about your vote for Congress, how important to you was…?
% say “Crucial”
Government corruption 54%
The cost of living 49%
Immigration enforcement policies 36%
The war in Iran 34%
Al data centers 23%
cc: @VP @JDVance
nbcnews.com/politics/2026-el…
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
On Vance's statement that "The reason we lost is the war." Looking at exit polls, the top three issues voters described as "crucial or major" factors in determining their votes were (1) "government corruption," named by 90% of the voters, which Democrats won with 56%; (2) "cost of living," named by 89% of all voters, which Democrats won with 58%, and (3) the Iran war, named by 74% of all voters, which Democrats won with 63%. So there was no single reason for a defeat as massive and sprawling as this one. And some of the reasons overlapped, as in the fact that the war was also responsible for some of the voters' concerns about cost of living. But overall, the war was certainly a big part of the voters' decision. And the majority of voters who named the war as a "crucial or major" factor in their vote and voted for Democrats were not the Trump-should-finish-the-job camp. They opposed the war.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Last night's datacenter moratorium/restrictions appear to have gone 43 - 1, with a massive swell of public support averaging 77% to shut it all down. Public sentiment on on AI in America has been going steadily downhill for three years. It is once again at a new low.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
From exit polls, the percentage of voters who ranked a particular issue a "crucial or major factor" in deciding their vote, followed by the percentage of them who voted Democrat:
90% Government corruption (56%)
89% Cost of living (58%)
74% Iran (63%)
73% Immigration enforcement policies (46%)
56% AI/Data centers (64%)
foxnews.com/elections/polls/…
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Reminder that flying in a chartered jet is 9x more deadly than flying in a commercial aircraft and flying in a privately owned jet can be as 50x more deadly than a commercial aircraft.
General aviation pistons (ie Cessna) are 200x more deadly that commercial aircraft and are as risky as motorcycles.
There are 2-3 fatal accidents involving an airplane every single week.
I’m a pilot and know that I am taking a substantial risk every time I go up. Almost every pilot I know with more than a few hundred hours has a story of a close call that almost ended it all. It’s a risk we all are aware of and accept.
The most common cause for fatal accidents involves weather.
Unfortunately, there is nothing unusual about the accident.
It involved icing + thunderstorms, a deadly combo.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
"Seattle office buildings sell for pennies on the dollar as major employers shift jobs elsewhere"
901 Fifth Avenue sold for $48.3M ↓84% vs $304.5M in 2019
Roosevelt Commons sold for $27M ↓83% vs $157M in 2019
Plaza 600 sold for $12.5M ↓87% vs $97M valuation in a 2019 recapitalization
Amazon has relinquished more than 1 million square feet of Seattle office space since 2020
#commercialrealestate
kvi.com/2026/11/02/seattle-o…
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Canada lost 110,000 jobs in two months.
This morning its finance minister stood up in Toronto and said Canada has "created almost twice as many jobs per capita as the United States."
Statistics Canada:
-41,700 jobs in August.
-68,300 in September.
Unemployment 6.5%.
Youth unemployment 13.0%.
Over the past year, employment is up 94,900 while the working-age population grew by 183,000.
Reuters said September's drop erased all the employment gains from earlier this year.
Twice as many jobs? Show me where.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Replying to @CyberSecurity__
Free trial over at @slicervm - plus access to Discord to talk and get started. Runs on Linux, macOS, WSL2.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Could not agree more.
For us:
Sparks/GPUs = inference
Superterm = local/remote agent management + chat + voice
Toilgate = LLM gateway for all your hosts
SlicerVM = isolate and program microVMs for agents/disposable computers
Own your intelligence.
Anyone that opposes this has something to sell you (perhaps your own intelligence back to you.)
Local models need to continue proliferating. The “absolute unit” massive models may be out of reach for now locally, so your best option is to, indeed, keep your options open. Own your harness, data, connections, runtime: your agents. Embrace open source.
ᶜʸᵇᵉʳˢᵉᶜᵘʳⁱᵗʸ retweeted
Own your intelligence.
Anyone that opposes this has something to sell you (perhaps your own intelligence back to you.)
Local models need to continue proliferating. The “absolute unit” massive models may be out of reach for now locally, so your best option is to, indeed, keep your options open. Own your harness, data, connections, runtime: your agents. Embrace open source.
































