Pinned Tweet
Replying to @EverydayHum4n
Hello
I’m Daniel, I’m 19 years old,
🩷💜💙,and go to Clarkson University for Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
I ski in my free time, host DnD campaigns, organize events, build robots and a fuck ton more
I’M WOKE AS SHIT I LIKE BOYS AND PROTEST A LOT
My opinions are my own
Orion | why chemistry | retweeted
Many data centers will have to cease operations, and most of those currently planned will never be built. This can only be good news for the planet.
Orion | why chemistry | retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 $1.8 trillion wiped out from the US stock market today.
Orion | why chemistry | retweeted
THE AI BUBBLE IS ACTUALLY GONNA POP??
🚨 US LAWMAKERS ARE NOW PREPARING FOR THE AI BUBBLE TO BURST.
House Democrats have introduced a resolution opposing government bailouts for AI companies if the industry crashes.
Instead of rescuing them with taxpayer money, lawmakers want failed AI companies to go through normal bankruptcy.
And the timing is extremely concerning.
Some of the world's biggest tech companies are investing billions into AI startups that spend heavily on their products.
• Nvidia invests in CoreWeave, which buys Nvidia chips.
• Microsoft invests in OpenAI, which spends billions on Microsoft's cloud services.
• Amazon invests in Anthropic, which uses Amazon's cloud infrastructure.
Billions are moving between companies that are becoming increasingly dependent on each other's spending.
And lawmakers are raising concerns about the growing use of borrowed money by Big Tech and Wall Street to finance the AI boom.
The resolution is not law, but it shows that some lawmakers are already worried about what happens if the industry collapses.
If AI startups run out of funding, they could be forced to slash spending or declare bankruptcy, leaving their investors and suppliers facing massive losses.
And without government bailouts, a major failure could spread across chipmakers, cloud providers, banks and the broader stock market.
The biggest risk is that one major AI bankruptcy could trigger losses across an entire industry worth trillions.
I’ve hear so many instances of artists getting references for commissions, they draw using the reference, post it, and then realize the reference was AI generated, and it shows in their work
If you use ai EVER, bare minimum disclaimer
Clearly, this is AI slop.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The artwork is not AI-generated "slop" but original hand-drawn digital fan art by @Skufrik, with visible signature, brushwork and human errors; their account includes timelapse process videos of similar pieces.
x.com/Skufrik/status…
x.com/Skufrik/status…
Orion | why chemistry | retweeted
I did not and would never consent to this administration running my fanart through AI and posting it. Can’t even believe I’m saying these words.
There’s Magic in Learning 🪄
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This image is an AI recreation of an artwork done by @DevinElleKurtz and Devin further stated they did not give the
U.S. Department of Education permission to use their artwork.
x.com/DevinElleKurtz…
Source, probably polymarket or some other gambling app that pretends to be a news source
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more













































