
Connecting institutions, ideas and people | Secretary of the Board of Analysts @OrdoIuris | Curator & Co-founder, @P4Freedom Usual disclaimers
Warsaw, Poland
Joined September 2023
- Tweets14.7K
- Following877
- Followers625
- Likes61.9K
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
One difficulty about the post-1989 politics of Central Europe is that unreformed ex-communists go about in disguise, often a light Euro-federalist one that buys them respectability in Brussels. Jansa has fought them effectively & democratically. His decisions command respect.
This is the reality about the EU. An organisation @RachelReevesMP claims she is proud to join. I suspect she knows nothing about it.
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
📩 Od piątku do Instytutu @OrdoIuris spływają telefony i e-maile z zagranicy. Ludzie zwłaszcza z Europy i ze Stanów Zjednoczonych pytają z niepokojem: co się dzieje w Polsce?
Dlatego przygotowaliśmy szczegółowy opis sytuacji wokół policyjnego przejęcia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, opublikowaliśmy i rozesłaliśmy go do setek naszych korespondentów za granicą (do dziennikarzy, polityków, think tanków...).
⚖️ Reakcje są jednoznaczne. To, co wyprawia rząd Donalda Tuska z Trybunałem Konstytucyjnym, szokuje. Jest odbierane co najmniej jako zamach na praworządność, a często wprost jako zamach stanu. Policja nie wpuszcza prezesa TK do budynku, a wpuszcza osobę, która nigdy nie złożyła ślubowania przed Prezydentem. Ta sama mianuje siebie prezesem i zawiesza prawowitego prezesa i wiceprezesa. Takich obrazów nie zna żadna demokracja.
Akcję przeprowadzono w piątek wieczorem, tuż przed długim weekendem Wszystkich Świętych. Jeśli liczono na to, że dzięki temu przejdzie bez większego rozgłosu, pierwszy etap zakończył się porażką. Zagraniczni politycy reagują, media piszą i mówią.
👉 Świat patrzy. I coraz lepiej rozumie, co naprawdę dzieje się dziś w Polsce. Zwłaszcza w Europie te partie bardziej suwerennościowe zrozumiały wreszcie, że Polska jest poletkiem doświadczalnym unijczyków i że nie mogą pozostać obojętni.
On October 30, police helped a person who is not lawfully a judge seize Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal (@TK_GOV_PL) and “suspend” its President — an operation that may amount to a coup d’état.
Riot police cordoned off the building, the Tribunal’s guards were ordered out, and Anna Korwin-Piotrowska declared herself acting head of the court. She then “suspended” President Bogdan Święczkowski and Vice-President Bartłomiej Sochański under a provision of the common courts act that does not apply to the Tribunal. Police kept Święczkowski out of the building.
Yet under Polish law, a Constitutional Tribunal judge enters service only after taking the oath before the President of the Republic. Korwin-Piotrowska never did: she was “sworn in” at a ceremony in the Sejm, Poland’s lower house of parliament. In law, she is not a judge.
President Karol Nawrocki (@NawrockiKn) cut short a state visit to Senegal and declared that a constitutional state body had been taken over by force. The heads of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court condemned the operation. Prime Minister Donald Tusk (@donaldtusk) endorsed it.
The takeover may constitute a coup d’état under Article 128 of the Polish Criminal Code. It also threatens the Tribunal’s case law protecting unborn life and the constitutional definition of marriage.
Ordo Iuris calls on international lawyers and NGOs to speak out.
Read our full analysis:
ordoiuris.pl/en/press-newsde…
#RuleOfLaw #Poland #Democracy
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
On October 30, police helped a person who is not lawfully a judge seize Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal (@TK_GOV_PL) and “suspend” its President — an operation that may amount to a coup d’état.
Riot police cordoned off the building, the Tribunal’s guards were ordered out, and Anna Korwin-Piotrowska declared herself acting head of the court. She then “suspended” President Bogdan Święczkowski and Vice-President Bartłomiej Sochański under a provision of the common courts act that does not apply to the Tribunal. Police kept Święczkowski out of the building.
Yet under Polish law, a Constitutional Tribunal judge enters service only after taking the oath before the President of the Republic. Korwin-Piotrowska never did: she was “sworn in” at a ceremony in the Sejm, Poland’s lower house of parliament. In law, she is not a judge.
President Karol Nawrocki (@NawrockiKn) cut short a state visit to Senegal and declared that a constitutional state body had been taken over by force. The heads of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court condemned the operation. Prime Minister Donald Tusk (@donaldtusk) endorsed it.
The takeover may constitute a coup d’état under Article 128 of the Polish Criminal Code. It also threatens the Tribunal’s case law protecting unborn life and the constitutional definition of marriage.
Ordo Iuris calls on international lawyers and NGOs to speak out.
Read our full analysis:
ordoiuris.pl/en/press-newsde…
#RuleOfLaw #Poland #Democracy
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Krótki komentarz tuż po przygotowaniu newslettera @OrdoIuris, w przerwie między wywiadami i rozmowami z dziennikarzami.
Zamach stanu.
Środowiska prawnicze zjednoczone jak nigdy.
Wszyscy przeciw Tuskowi.
Wszyscy przeciw użyciu siły wobec sądów i trybunałów.
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Incredible to catalogue the sheer complicity of the media in laundering Donald Tusks's constitutional coup.
Multiple outlets even said that Nawrocki was the one storming the court, not the Tusk-backed judges and the riot police cordon!
Poland's constitutional coup: The INCREDIBLE media double-standards
Poland's constitutional crisis has exposed the extraordinary double standards of Europe's mainstream media.
LOOK AT THE HEADLINES
DER SPIEGEL: "Poland's president storms the Constitutional Court”.
DIE WELT: "Tusk has the problem of having to break existing law in order to establish the rule of law.”
POLITICO: attacked the court's "nationalist-linked leadership", before announcing: "Commission backs Tusk as he vows no compromise in court showdown”.
LE MONDE opened its analysis by explaining that the deadlock was "born of" Nawrocki's refusal to receive the judges' oaths (translated).
N-TV "Poland's president storms the Constitutional Court".
DEUTSCHE WELLE described Court President Święczkowski as "one of a slew of politically aligned judges”
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Was quick to announce that Poland has to "function in accordance with the ... relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union"
It was Karol Nawrocki described as storming the court, not the riot police who had sealed off the institution, nor the judges attempting to displace its leadership.
It was Donald Tusk posed as “restoring order”.
It was about the need to ensure the “rule of law”.
SOME NOTABLE EXCEPTIONS
@TheEconomist was strikingly direct: "Donald Tusk has deployed riot police to get his judges seated."
@euronews actually put both sides on air this morning.
@notesfrompoland documented the attempted takeover and reported serious objections from constitutional lawyers opposed to PiS.
@brusselssignal examined the difference between Brussels supporting parliamentary appointments and endorsing Friday's operation. It highlighted the controversial appointment of Tusk's former minister Maciej Berek and the legal questions surrounding the suspension.
THE DOUBLE STANDARDS
Brussels spent years sanctioning Poland and withholding EU funds over judicial interference under PiS.
Under PiS, politically connected judges were evidence of institutional capture. Under PiS, pressure on the judiciary was democratic backsliding. Under Tusk, an extraordinary intervention against the court's leadership is a difficult but necessary reform.
Now, as Tusk's allies attempt to displace the leadership of the very same institution, the Commission is supporting Tusk.
Imagine the headlines if PiS had deployed riot police while its preferred judges attempted to remove the sitting leadership of the Constitutional Tribunal.
Imagine the instant denunciations from the Commission.
Why is it always "political pressure" when the conservative government attempts legal reforms, and yet framed as "restoring judicial independence" under Tusk?
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Day 4 of the assault on the Constitutional Tribunal – the calm before the storm
The General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces suggested that the protests outside the Constitutional Tribunal (TK) might have been instigated by the intelligence services of hostile states. This was met with public alarm—fears of a forceful crackdown under such a false pretext—as well as widespread indignation. The public reaction forced a retraction of the statement and a public apology.
The President of the Constitutional Tribunal presented a document, dated several months prior, which authorizes one of the judges to act on his behalf in the event of his incapacity. This implies that, should both the President and the Vice-President be unable to perform their duties, the authority to act falls to one of the legitimately appointed judges—and certainly not to any of the "usurpers."
An increasing number of legal experts are criticizing the government’s actions regarding the Constitutional Tribunal—including those who have consistently supported the government for years. Prosecutors have publicly stated that the takeover of the Constitutional Tribunal building involved numerous criminal acts, which should be straightforward to prove in a court of law.
The stock market index tracking Poland’s largest companies has fallen by nearly 4% since Thursday’s close. The Polish zloty has weakened by approximately 1% against major currencies. Despite the war raging just across Poland’s border, the Polish economy, stock market, and currency had remained stable; however, the takeover of the Constitutional Tribunal—coupled with concerns that the national central bank might face a similar fate—has triggered investor anxiety. Nearly 50 organizations from Poland and abroad have joined a coalition of civil society groups opposing the unlawful takeover of the Constitutional Tribunal (TK) building.
A growing number of think tanks are publishing critical statements and analyses regarding the situation at the Constitutional Tribunal, as well as the General Assembly of the Tribunal’s judges—convened illegally for tomorrow by an unauthorized individual. This assembly is expected to result in unlawful decisions, ranging from the reduction of the statutory quorum to the lifting of the immunity of the Tribunal’s presidents.
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Znasz to z każdej kampanii? Obietnice, hasła, „gotowe projekty”. A po wyborach – pusta szuflada. 🗂️
Adw. Jerzy Kwaśniewski, prezes Ordo Iuris, mówi wprost: nie spodziewajmy się, że politycy w czasie kampanii napiszą gotowe ustawy. Oni walczą o głosy. Dlatego Instytut robi to, czego partie nie zdążą zrobić.
Plan Naprawy Państwa to założenia 23 ustaw, uchwał i decyzji, które nowy rząd mógłby wdrożyć w pierwszym kwartale. Przemyślane, przekonsultowane z ekspertami i sprawdzone. Tak, żeby obietnice przestały być tylko obietnicami. ✅
🎥 Posłuchaj w @PCh24pl: youtube.com/watch?v=u51TUvee…
📥 Plan Naprawy Państwa: ordoiuris.pl/raport/plan-nap…
🎧 „Na prawo patrz!” #1: youtube.com/watch?v=ehpBjiW5…
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Schrödinger's coup:
The police deployment was both necessary to restore the constitutional order and at the same time did not happen, depending on who you are talking to at any given time.
Replying to @TheEconomist
Let’s stick to the facts: police did not enter the Tribunal building. The judges were elected by Parliament, not appointed by Tusk. Calling them “his judges” and suggesting they were installed by force is misleading. Readers deserve accurate reporting.
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Wrote this on the authoritarian threat to democracy in Poland indeed throughout the European Union
spiked-online.com/2026/11/02…
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
350 thousand people have watched my explanation of the Polish crisis
If Tusk is bonkers enough to send armed troopers at elderly judges, then this is likely to get even more bonkers
Get the fundamentals, here:
youtu.be/Z7NC7-2GvcU?si=MMAW…
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
The rule of law is an important element of democracy. European elites, backed by the European Commission, loves to claim the high ground: it is the defender of the law, and its enemies are always those tearing up the rule of law.
But this is often simply propaganda.
Look at the pattern:
Poland, 30 October: a judge whom President Nawrocki had refused to swear in suspended the president and vice-president of the Constitutional Tribunal and announced she was taking control. Police were deployed to the court. Even Marcin Matczak, a liberal law professor and no friend of PiS, says there is no legal basis for the suspension.
Romania: a presidential election annulled after the first round in 2024, and its frontrunner barred from the rerun.
Hungary: a retroactive term limit, passed by the new two-thirds majority within weeks of taking office, ensures Viktor Orbán can never be prime minister again. This was followed by retroactive terms limits for senior MPs, disabling a large part of the opposition from ever running.
France: Marine Le Pen cleared to run in 2027, but sentenced to a year under an electronic tag, suspended only while she appeals again.
Germany: the largest opposition party labelled ‘confirmed right-wing extremist’ by the domestic intelligence service, widely seen as groundwork for a ban, until a Cologne court halted it in February.
That some of these were (eventually) stopped by the courts is little comfort.
In every case, we were repeatedly assured that the rule of law was being upheld. The European Commission was distinctly uninterested in coming to the aid of right-wing populists when the law is weaponised against them.
As our Policy Director @jacobreynolds put it: you can do all of these things, so long as you are on the right side of the European Commission. Brussels’ response to Poland proves his point. The press has widely reported that Donald Tusk has the backing of the EU Commission. And the Commission itself said it was for the "Polish authorities" to make sure the tribunal works in line with the Polish constitution and the case law of the EU’s Court of Justice. But just note the second condition: EU law must have the final word; the very item on which the Polish Constitutional Courts were in dispute.
Lawfare has become the preferred tool of a political class that no longer trusts voters to choose correctly. A democracy that disposes of inconvenient candidates, judges and elections through legal machinery is not defending itself. It is hollowing itself out.
Our Research Director Richard Schenk, who spoke on liberal authoritarianism and national sovereignty at the European Parliament in Strasbourg on 22 October, put it this way: ‘The so-called “democratic centre” is convinced it is in the right against the “evil right-wing populists”, and in the process it is doing more damage to democracy than they ever have.’
Indeed, as our President, Frank Füredi, has put it: ‘Slowly, a new authoritarian imperial order is taking shape within the European Union.’ The actions of Tusk were long premeditated, "For some time now, Brussels has been actively promoting the project of undermining and ultimately crushing its opponents in Poland."
Europe’s democracies belong to their citizens. We intend to defend them.
When you look at the comparison chart the double standards are so blatant! Great article!
If you want know more about the EU's use of double standards, click the link below.
the1020.substack.com/p/bruss…
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
W rozmowie z norweskim partnerem @OrdoIuris na temat wydarzeń w Polsce.
Poland's Constitutional Tribunal is in a standoff, and Europe should be watching.
I spoke from Oslo with @jerzKwasniewski, president of @OrdoIuris. He calls it what it is: a coup d'état. President @NawrockiKn cut short his trip to Senegal, returned to Warsaw and entered @TK_GOV_PL, while thousands gathered outside and lawyers, judges and prosecutors signed a joint statement calling for legal order.
Jerzy will be with us in Oslo tomorrow. Thank you, Jerzy. We pray for Poland. 🇵🇱
cc: @prezydentpl
Można by się śmiać, że to taki kabaret z czasów komunizmu... ale sprawa jest zbyt poważna...
W ostatnich dniach dała się poznać jako uprzejma gospodyni, która przywitała prezydenta Nawrockiego w Trybunale słowami "nie wejdzie Pan tutaj". Co jeszcze wiemy o Annie Korwin-Piotrowskiej? Cofnijmy się do 2024 roku.
Wtedy to Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości postanowiło wyłonić nowego prezesa Sądu Okręgowego w Opolu i oddało głos lokalnym sędziom. Odbyło się oficjalne głosowanie samorządu, które znaczną przewagą głosów wygrał sędzia Daniel Kliś. Sędzia Anna Korwin-Piotrowska zajęła drugie miejsce.
Co zrobił resort Adama Bodnara? Zignorował zwycięzcę głosowania i na stanowisko prezesa powołał właśnie Korwin-Piotrowską.
O sprawie tej oraz kulisach pominięcia zwycięzcy głosowania do dziś możemy zresztą przeczytać w artykule Nowej Trybuny Opolskiej.
I tu pojawia się pytanie do Pana Ministra @Adbodnar: jaki atut Anny Korwin-Piotrowskiej przechylił szalę na jej korzyść? Dlaczego zignorowano jednoznaczne wyniki lokalnego głosowania i wolę samorządu sędziowskiego?
Panie Ministrze, mam nadzieję, że odpowie Pan nam na te pytania.
Serio? Czy ktoś to oglądał?
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Crazy. Natural gas costs roughly 10x more in Europe than in America.
Europe, especially Germany, inflicted this economic carnage on itself, leaving it wide open to energy shocks. Russian gas dependence. Fracking bans. Nuclear shutdowns. Net Zero zealotry.
These were deliberate political decisions, not acts of God.
European households and businesses pay the heavy price while the politicians responsible - Merkel, von der Leyen and the others - walk away richer and untouched.
How do they get away with this? @JavierBlas
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
🚨 TRYBUNAŁ WCIĄŻ ZAJĘTY. MUSIMY GO BRONIĆ! Podpisz👉 obronictrybunal.ordoiuris.pl…
Policja w gmachu TK. Prezes za bramą. Prezydent szarpany w drzwiach. Władzę przejęła osoba bez ślubowania.
Żądamy:
1⃣ wycofania policji z Trybunału,
2⃣ ujawnienia, kto wydał rozkazy,
3⃣ śledztwa prokuratury (art. 128 i 231 k.k.).
Każdy podpis to głos, którego władza nie może zignorować.
✍️ Podpisz i udostępnij! obronictrybunal.ordoiuris.pl…
🤖 Made with AI
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
Fair play to Euronews for being so far the only outlet interested in anything but the Tusk narrative about events in Poland.
"Even lawyers who are close to the Tusk government say that there's absolutely no legal basis for such behavior."
Polish Secretary of State @marcin_przydacz on #EuropeToday as Poland's crisis deepens following the suspension of the Constitutional Tribunal president.
Agnieszka Kolek retweeted
There you have it - proof that he’s a liar and a puppet of Brussels, just like the rest of the liberals.
In this video, a European Commission representative praises the new Hungarian government for implementing the Migration Pact and confirms that the Prime Minister himself informed the Commission of this.






























