
prof @droitumontreal | evidence law | medicine | experts/expertise | rhetoric | (techno)sciences | (meta)(bio)ethics — unusual music
YUL
Joined February 2015
- Tweets2.7K
- Following287
- Followers264
- Likes1.5K
Legal scholars read statutes, judgments, and other scholars. Trial transcripts are scandalously overlooked. Judgments present a tidy case. Transcripts show cases being made and unmade in real-time. My new paper examines expert evidence in a big telecom case ⬇️ 1/
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Unravelling MAiD (linked in the thread & available online for free) is a required read authored by field & patient experts. It’s a critical examination of Canada’s death program through the lens of law, policy, ethics, disability rights & more. I highly encourage you to read it
I definitely don't say this often enough but I'm extremely grateful to @rljcoelho @TrudoLemmens and @Psych_MD for including me in their book. Not to even mention their tremendous support and encouragement.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
"What is the use of Greek and Latin literature? I have to answer this in a very few pages: therefore I must be dogmatic. But I shall say nothing I am not prepared to prove, in detail, against any challenge: in most cases I have the proof already written." antigonejournal.com/2024/11/…
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Humanists should be snobby about the fact that they are stewarding a tradition that stretches back thousands of years rather than doing busy work involving little technical puzzles. Instead they find dumb “research” niches to fill because STEM gave them an inferiority complex.
Replying to @jennfrey
I'm convinced that the R1 model will always disfavor the humanities and liberal learning and that we need to be very savvy and strategic in how we understand ourselves and our place within that model. Very few humanists agree with me, I've found.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Opinion @mtlgazette
MAID is not a solution for dementia I'm a doctor who cares for Alzheimer’s patients.
Canada is wrong to open the door to advance consent
- Dr. Catherine Ferrier, division of geriatric medicine at the McGill University Health Centre
montrealgazette.com/opinion/…
Some people think that Learned Hand had the perfect name for a judge. But "Learned" was the judge's middle name, not his first name.
Hand's real first name was better suited for a lawyer: Billings.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
One of the enduring characteristics of right-wing rhetoric is to redirect blame for social unhappiness from the practices and institutions left intellectuals usually criticize to the fact that left intellectuals are criticizing...
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Get rotated fucking idiot. Apex predator my ass
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
They sure have. And as someone who has testified before parliamentary committees on MAID three times, I can tell you the hostility and aggressiveness towards any criticism or challenge of MAiD during this last round was unparalleled. Senator Wells was a big part of why.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
"Barriers" has become a repetitive buzzword, used as a blanket label for any rule, law, or regulation. Deliberate obscuring of intent when those act as safeguards, protections and requirements to prevent abuse and protect lives.
It renders word meaningless & as a crip I object.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
"I was warned about this by people opposing the law that told me, 'We see your motivation is good, but you will see, once you open the door you will not close it and it will open wider.' And this is what happened," he said.
🎤 Philippe Couillard on CBC linkedin.com/feed/update/urn…
Totally correct & one could add: there’s this little thing called the Rule of law & because of it, MDs are accountable to the law whether they like it or not (as everyone else); the law is the last word; the alternative is MDs above the law (though surely some would love that).
Replying to @PaulMSherman
I have a tremendous amount of respect for physicians and the difficult work they do on the front lines of end-of-life care. That doesn’t mean they have a monopoly on legitimate opinions on what we may permissibly do to human beings.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
My oped in @TorontoStar on why we must further suspend #MAID #Euthanasia for mental illness & address current problems with MAID practice + separate that from advance requests for MAID. Online version has links for all points made thestar.com/opinion/contribu…
Absolutely.
If there is anyone who you should support for thoughtful commentaries on various issues, particularly MAID and disability-related issues, it is @mssinenomine. You can disagree, and challenge her, which I trust she'd like, but you won't regret from having been pushed to think
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Mikhail Gorbachev feeding a squirrel, 1989.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
I haven’t been writing regularly on substack and part of that is because of health issues I’ve been dealing with. But the other part is I don’t have many paid subscriptions and I’m kind of over watching my work copied and pasted by those who get paid & access to write/speak.
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
1. It is killing. Euthanasia is the killing of one person by another.
2. The govt itself refers to it as the MAiD regime.
3. Speaking plainly and directly is the most effective way to neutralize deceptive language, such as obfuscation, political spin, or govt doublespeak.
The nice thing about this guy is that he’s auto-disqualifying AND serves as Exhibit A for why Canadian euthanasia has gone off the rails. Keep going Tyler!


























