Human node connecting bitcoin business globally. Writing a book too. #npub1v67clmf4jrezn8hsz28434nc0y5fu65e5esws04djnl2kasxl5tskjmjjk

Somewhere šŸŒ
Joined May 2021
Replying to @planb_network
@planb_network @mir_btc @RunwithBitcoin @nayibbukele Left with one lesson: communities aren't built on hype. They're built on hope, joy and people who care 🧔 #Bitcoin
4
8
533
Squid Game āŒ Bitmela šŸ’Æ, but the prize is the Game of money. šŸŖ™ šŸ’° Green or Red? A stranger. A subway. I flipped the tile and got invited to something new. BITMELA, 30-31 Oct, Jaipur Bit by bit, a new kind of mela. TheBitmela.com #BITMELA #FutureOfMoney
3
4
1
14
469
…and we kick off at Bitcoin Underground tonight 🟠 Via Francesco Soave 5, Lugano No Golden Ticket? Pay your drinks with the Chimera Wallet POS And don't leave without trying the Chimera drink. The best is yet to come @planb_network @RunwithBitcoin @sbaaaam21 @chimera_wallet
This ticket is bloody GOLDEN! Look forward to the whole week of #bitcoin fun in Lugano :) Thanks @sbaaaam21 for this šŸ«°šŸ¼ Mil mil Grazie #planbweek #lugano
2
1
9
269
Paco de la India retweeted
Most hardware wallets talk to your computer over USB or Bluetooth. SeedSigner talks through a camera and QR codes. You scan a transaction into it, check the details on its screen, sign, and it shows a QR code for your wallet app to scan back. There’s no data cable and no wireless link for anything to travel through. It also doesn’t keep your seed after it’s switched off. You load it when you need it, and when the power goes, so does the key. Unchained’s report points out that QR and microSD transfers reduce exposure to attacks aimed at always-connected interfaces. One catch it also stresses: you still have to verify the transaction details on the device’s screen. The air gap protects the channel, not your attention. @SeedSigner Ā· ₹8,499
1
2
9
360
Paco de la India retweeted
Steel solves one specific problem: your seed phrase surviving damage. Fire, water, fading ink and time are what paper loses to. A punched steel plate handles all of them. What steel doesn’t solve: someone finding it. Anyone who gets hold of your plate and knows the format can read it, so where you keep it matters as much as what it’s made of. A decent setup is simple. Punch it, check it against your wallet screen, then store it out of sight and away from the device it backs up. A backup stored with your wallet can be lost in the same accident. Koshh covers the durability part. ₹3,750 $BTC
1
2
5
212
Paco de la India retweeted
What’s the one thing that would make you trust a hardware wallet more?
71%Open-source code
29%Independent audits
0%Certified secure chip
0%Years of track record
7 votes • Final results
2
2
3
245
Paco de la India retweeted
A 12-word seed phrase isn’t 12 words of pure randomness. Each word is picked from a list of 2,048, so each one carries 11 bits. Twelve words would be 132 bits, but Bitcoin keys use 128 bits of entropy. The extra 4 bits are a checksum, a built-in error check calculated from the rest. That’s why a mistyped or misordered phrase gets rejected by a wallet instead of quietly opening an empty wallet. A 24-word phrase works the same way: 256 bits of entropy plus an 8-bit checksum. It also means the last word isn’t fully free. Part of it is the checksum.
1
4
186
Paco de la India retweeted
Setting up a Bitaxe is simpler than most people expect. Here’s the whole process, start to finish. 1. Plug in the power supply and the screen lights up 2. Connect it to your Wi-Fi from your phone or laptop 3. Open its web interface and enter your pool address and your Bitcoin address 4. Save, and it starts hashing From then on the screen shows your live hashrate, so you can see it working without opening anything. No terminal, no rack, no special hardware. Watch the full setup in the video below, and if you get stuck at any step, DM us and we’ll walk you through it. #bitaxe $BTC
2
4
11
262
Paco de la India retweeted
Hodlonaut about to publish a hit piece on me. Seems to think this article is biased, I thought it was quite a fair representation of both sides of the debate, which I watched live at Bitcoin++ in Austin in 2025 and reported on days later. What do you think? Buddy should move on. bitcoinmagazine.com/technica…
17
5
55
3,984
Paco de la India retweeted
Thinking about multisig? One thing worth checking is which chip makers your wallets share. Per Unchained’s report: Trezor Safe 3, 5 and 7 and the BitBox02 Nova all use Infineon’s OPTIGA Trust M V3 secure element. Jade uses Espressif chips. Passport Prime uses Microchip parts plus its own avalanche noise circuit. If a flaw turned up in one maker’s silicon, a multisig built from wallets that all share it would be exposed together. Mixing makers spreads that risk. We carry all of these, so if you’re planning a setup, DM us and we’ll help you pick a combination.
1
1
7
304
Paco de la India retweeted
Last couple months have kind of been vindication season for all of the @SeedSigner maxis out there.
15
17
3
216
4,504
Paco de la India retweeted
Most wallets get their randomness from a chip whose inner workings you can’t inspect. Even the maker usually can’t show you the full design, because it’s proprietary silicon. Foundation’s Passport Prime does something unusual: alongside its processor and secure element, it includes a diode avalanche noise circuit. A diode is pushed into a controlled breakdown, which produces unpredictable bursts of current, and the device reads that noise as randomness. What sets it apart, per Unchained’s report, is that the circuit is built from ordinary discrete components with an open-source schematic. Anyone can look at how it works, which isn’t possible with the random number generator inside a typical chip. Unchained is clear that this is only one of the device’s sources and the chips around it are still proprietary. But a part of the randomness you can actually inspect is rare. @FoundationHQ Ā· ₹57,499
1
1
4
207
Paco de la India retweeted
Most hardware wallets lean on the random number generator inside one chip and ask you to trust it. BitBox takes a different route: it mixes five separate sources of randomness when it generates your key. Per Unchained’s research, those are: • A hardware random number generator in the main microcontroller • A second one in the secure element • A hash of your own password • A secret number generated at the factory, unique to your device • Randomness from the BitBox app on your phone or computer The point of mixing them is redundancy. When sources are combined properly, the result is at least as strong as the strongest one. If a chip turns out to have a flaw, the other sources still protect your key. An attacker would have to break all five to rebuild it. Unchained adds a fair caveat: this holds assuming the design is implemented correctly, and the chips themselves are proprietary, so no one outside the manufacturers can fully audit them. Mixing sources doesn’t remove trust. It spreads it across more places. BitBox02 and BitBox02 Nova are both in our collection. @BitBoxSwiss
1
1
3
278
Paco de la India retweeted
The Gamma 601 runs at about 1.2 TH/s on 17W, which is less than a phone charger. Plug it in, point it at a pool, and watch your hashrate on the screen. Solo mining income is small and uneven, so don’t buy one expecting a paycheck. You’re buying a real, independent entry into the block-finding lottery that costs almost nothing to keep running. ₹18,000 #bitaxe $BTC
1
2
5
270
Paco de la India retweeted
A Bitcoin key is just a very large number. Its security depends entirely on how unpredictable the process was that picked it. Guess one coin flip: 1 in 2. That’s 1 bit of entropy. Guess 256 flips in the right order: 1 in 2²⁵⁶. That’s the level of unpredictability a hardware wallet has to reproduce on its own. It’s harder than it sounds. Computers are built to give the same output for the same input, so they can’t simply ā€œbe random.ā€ Software random number generators start from a seed, and if that seed becomes known, every output is predictable. People aren’t reliable either: we avoid repeats and round numbers, which makes our ā€œrandomā€ picks easier to guess. That’s why hardware wallets rely on physical noise inside the device, such as tiny timing variations in electronic circuits, rather than a formula. Many also mix several sources together, so one weak source doesn’t sink the whole key. Most people never think about this step, yet it decides whether a key is secure from the very first second. @BlockstreamJade
2
4
6
227
Paco de la India retweeted
Bitasha runs affiliate program. If you know Bitcoiners who'd want a hardware wallet, Koshh backup, or a Bitaxe on their desk, you earn on every sale you send our way. No minimum, no signup fee. DM "AFFILIATE" and we'll get you set up.
1
4
226
Paco de la India retweeted
NerdOctaxe: ~9.6 TH/s for ₹53,000 — roughly ₹5,520 per TH/s. $BTC Compare that to the Gamma 601 at ₹18,000 for 1.2 TH/s — about ₹15,000 per TH/s. The entry unit costs less upfront, but NerdOctaxe is actually the better value per unit of hashrate in the lineup. Runs on open-source firmware too — point it at whatever pool you choose, including solo-mining pools, nothing locked down. The largest footprint in the lineup, built for people who've already decided solo mining is worth taking seriously. ₹53,000
2
2
5
420
Paco de la India retweeted
What would you do with a spare ₹18,000? Most wouldn't spend it on a chance to mine Bitcoin. Bitaxe Gamma — plug in, connect to a pool, and start mining. You may not get rich. But you're actually in the game. #bitaxe $BTC
1
2
7
327
Paco de la India retweeted
A mistake people make with any seed phrase backup, steel or paper: writing down the wrong word order. Your wallet gives you 12 or 24 words in a specific sequence. That sequence matters as much as the words themselves. Double-check it against your wallet screen before you lock it away. #koshh @Trezor
1
2
11
620
Paco de la India retweeted
šŸŽ GIVEAWAY šŸŽ Win a Koshh Tag — the self-custody backup. Winner's choice of finish: Mirror, Matte, or Black. To enter: 1ļøāƒ£ Follow @BitashaIndia 2ļøāƒ£ Like & Repost 3ļøāƒ£ Tag a friend Good luck!
26
25
1
31
1,323