Hey @grok, it's X payout day, and I want you to calculate @thsottiaux pay period calculation.
What you need to do is post the average impressions he has for this payout period, and then calculate the X payout for him.
It's wonderful.
All my requests are now routing through the GPT-6.5 Bel. Bel is going to crush everyone out there.
It scores 100% in every benchmark we have tested till now. ASI is here...
Here is the breakdown I did:
The $500B Stargate number was never money already sitting in an account.
It was a multi-year plan for total AI infrastructure spending.
Early equity from SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle and MGX was closer to $50B.
SoftBank has since invested ~$65B into OpenAI itself, but the physical data centers still rely heavily on Oracle funding the builds, project debt, and capacity actually getting delivered.
All this is fine, but where is GPT-6.2?
Oh, wait, is this before it drops, so people clearly remember what its capability is and what it can do?
OpenAI is just making sure that, once GPT-6.2 drops, it will be a completely different benchmark; we need to benchmark GPT-6.2
A new way to measure how AI agents handle the routine analyses of wet-lab science—BioBasicsBench.
Developed with Ligo, a biotech company focused on enzyme design, the benchmark draws on 100 tasks from real experiments to test whether agents can interpret raw lab data, identify errors, and recognize when the evidence doesn’t support a conclusion.
Accelerating biological research starts with getting the everyday work right. BioBasicsBench shows where models need to improve, and helps us track what those gains mean for scientific progress, biosafety, and biosecurity.
openai.com/index/measuring-h…
Fable 5.5 and GPT-6.2 Astra are taking longer than expected.
It's not coincidental. It's planned.
Here are a few of them:
1. Anthropic's pre ipo valutions going down and its concern for them. Investors are pulling money out and also demanding a lower valuation than planned. It's a worry.
2. New money is not getting in; people have started asking about the ROI, revenue, and commitment made.
3. Security concerns are getting precedence over anything else, and they don't want to be caught off guard in this matter.
4. None of them want to release and get caught off guard by others; one, pacing the frontier is just a real thing they have put in.
5. There are no actual improvements in the model; it's just a little better than previous ones, and we have hit the ceiling here.
Let's see what is coming out; at the moment, I do not agree with anyone that any model is coming out soon...
I think I have figured out what is going on here:
1. Anthropic's IPO is delayed. Fable 5.5 is going to be late
2. OpenAI won't release in silos and will wait here. They also have some security concerns going on.
I am not asking to buy this, but I don't see the first half of November getting the latest models.
The $500B Stargate number was never money already sitting in an account.
It was a multi-year plan for total AI infrastructure spending.
Early equity from SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle and MGX was closer to $50B.
SoftBank has since invested ~$65B into OpenAI itself, but the physical data centers still rely heavily on Oracle funding the builds, project debt, and capacity actually getting delivered.
Before AI transforms your company, it might destroy what already works.
When we introduce AI into a company where data is poorly organized, it begins to act like a virus, replicating and amplifying everything that is wrong and introducing even greater chaos.
xitter.gq/swarogan/status/209633…
Dhaval retweeted
Does anyone know why I don't get notifications for all the comments / mentions? I keep finding one's that I never got notified on.
Dhaval retweeted
First Mac app shipped in October, built solo.
What's one feature you cut that you still think about?
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Dhaval retweeted
PERFORMANCE IS A DESIGN DECISION ⚡
A product can gain features and lose users at the same time.
As systems grow, new dependencies, queries, and integrations can increase latency. Those milliseconds accumulate and quietly degrade the user experience.
Protecting performance is a design decision:
• Define latency budgets for critical user journeys
• Track p50 / p95 / p99 — averages can hide tail latency
• Test under realistic workloads before shipping
• Catch regressions early
• Weigh the performance cost of key architectural decisions
A feature isn't an improvement if its latency cost outweighs the value it delivers.
Performance isn't something you fix after scaling. It's something you protect while scaling.
Your product is growing, but p95 latency keeps rising.
You can prioritize only ONE action. Which do you choose?🚥
A) Profile critical user journeys
B) Cut synchronous dependencies
C) Optimize database queries on critical paths
D) Add performance regression gates in CI
What's your pick, and why? 🤔🧩
35k ⭐ on GitHub in a month for skills.
Here are the 10 fastest-growing Claude Skills repositories in October 2026.
Among the leaders:
Matt Pocock Skills: +35,301 ⭐
Ponytail: +32,647 ⭐
Security Audit Skill: +31,357 ⭐
Security audit, code analysis, interface design, technical diagrams.
Which Skills do you use?
If you're building games with AI, you need this!
I'm experimenting with creating my own MMORPG using AI, and one of the biggest problems is constantly checking whether the generated code actually works.
I just found Genex Desktop, an open-source project that solves this.
The agent doesn't stop at writing code. It can run the game, control a character, observe gameplay, detect bugs, and go back to fixing them.
All of this works with Godot, Unity, or Unreal Engine, with the option to use local AI models as well.
If you're making a game, show me what you're working on!















