Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publication. CIA’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis testified that he informed Director Gina Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop about its impending release. This sequence of events suggests that senior CIA leadership had ample opportunity to assess the validity of the statement's claims. Furthermore, the COO’s office appeared to signal approval of the statement in a move that departed from standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols.
Additionally, some of the statement's signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time they issued the statement to discredit damaging allegations about Biden family influence peddling. Despite claiming they lacked access to classified information at the time, at least two signatories—Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were actively working for the CIA as contractors. This revelation raises concerns that these officials may have abused their positions to expedite the statement's approval and may have been earning taxpayer dollars while they did it.
Furthermore, officials within the CIA recognized at the time that the Hunter Biden statement was political and would hurt the Agency. The signatories’ decision to leverage their former intelligence community titles to promote a narrative about foreign election interference improperly embroiled the Agency in domestic politics. This report underscores the potential dangers of a politicized intelligence community.
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
"The House Intelligence Committee's work provided us with solid direct evidence that in the final weeks before the 2020 presidential election, 51 former intelligence officials coordinated with the Biden campaign to falsely cast doubt on an explosive New York Post story and label Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop as 'Russian disinformation.' The Committee worked to obtain classified documents from the CIA, including emails, and fought to include evidence of these materials in our report." -@RepMikeTurner
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
If you're on TikTok, you might know this already.
Afroman's house was wrongfully raided, and he made a song using the security camera footage.
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
How did this happen?
TONIGHT: @Yamiche speaks with Baltimore residents about the quality of their tap water and growing concerns about the city's aging infrastructure.
"I'm not comfortable with using it."
Tune in at 6:30pm ET / 5:30pm CT to watch more.
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
The last thing Gator said to me was “UR GONNA MISS THE REST OF THE MOVIE” and now I can’t even see that tweet anymore. 😭 In addition to all else, he was a prophet.
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
FREE @drrollergator
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
ffs, @elonmusk, people spend a lot of time building relationships on here. If you want to kill this platform, this is how to do it. None of your big ideas will matter if Twitter continually screws over their users with a broken moderation and appeals system.
#freedrrollergator
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
I *specifically* told @drrollergator to not let anything dum happen while I'm away. Now I check in and find that he's been permanently suspended for the crime of winning an appeal.
So @drrollergator was locked out of his account for no good reason. He then appealed, and won! But when he logged in he was informed that, despite winning his appeal, he was now permanently suspended.
Gator has been a constant target by both old and new Twitter. @elonmusk, help!
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
@elonmusk @drrollergator is a twitter lightning rod. Agree with him, or disagree, he expands the free speech discourse. He won his appeal yet was capriciously permanently banned. This feels like the old days of #TwitterFiles fame.
So @drrollergator was locked out of his account for no good reason. He then appealed, and won! But when he logged in he was informed that, despite winning his appeal, he was now permanently suspended.
Gator has been a constant target by both old and new Twitter. @elonmusk, help!
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
The only road to redemption for mainstream media orgs begins will a full self-audit of the Russiagate fiasco, which includes Pulitzers that need rethinking. It’s not a left or right issue, they just got this completely wrong on the facts, and need to own it.
Replying to @ggreenwald
The findings from the survey itself are even more striking.
It only took 6 years for "data" to prove the obvious: in an election where oligarchs spend trillions; CIA/FBI/DHS are involved; major media corporations are doing everything possible, a few Twitter bots are irrelevant.
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
The nopest of all things that was ever to nope in the history of everything nope.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
hello @elonmusk why have you not fired the twitter person who hates @drrollergator yet?
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
How can twitter keep suspending @drrollergator when he took the Covid fight to the source, possibly saving us all? #freedrrollergator
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
Those who need to be kept off the Church Committee -- and all committees -- are those who are agents of and liars for the US Security State: @RepAdamSchiff and @EricSwalwell.
Omar was the *first* after 1/6 to warn against a new domestic War on Terror.
thedailybeast.com/after-the-…
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
Curious, why is someone who is employed by the Washington Post just writing up her stories on Substack?
Vice-President Johnny 5, Humble Servant retweeted
9. “VF” refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limit the scope of a particular tweet’s discoverability; to block select users’ posts from ever appearing on the “trending” page; and from inclusion in hashtag searches.


























